From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Thomas Petazzoni Date: Fri, 16 Jul 2021 23:33:55 +0200 Subject: [Buildroot] [PATCH 1/2] package/libhtp: bump to version 0.5.38 In-Reply-To: <20210702192548.956881-1-fontaine.fabrice@gmail.com> References: <20210702192548.956881-1-fontaine.fabrice@gmail.com> Message-ID: <20210716233355.5e255464@windsurf> List-Id: To: buildroot@busybox.net MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit On Fri, 2 Jul 2021 21:25:47 +0200 Fabrice Fontaine wrote: > https://github.com/OISF/libhtp/releases/tag/0.5.38 > > Signed-off-by: Fabrice Fontaine > --- > package/libhtp/libhtp.hash | 2 +- > package/libhtp/libhtp.mk | 2 +- > 2 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) Both patches applied, thanks. However, it would have been nice to make it clear whether the htp bump to 0.5.38 is necessary for the suricata security bump. Since you sent both in the same series, I assumed it was the case, but I think it is important to make it clearer in the commit logs. Indeed, when Peter will review all the commits in "master" to consider them for the LTS branch, he will see the suricata "security bump", so he will backport it, but not necessarily that the libhtp bump is needed together with the suricata bump (if it's the case). Thanks a lot, Thomas -- Thomas Petazzoni, CTO, Bootlin Embedded Linux and Kernel engineering https://bootlin.com