From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-15.3 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,INCLUDES_CR_TRAILER,MAILING_LIST_MULTI, MENTIONS_GIT_HOSTING,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS,USER_AGENT_SANE_2 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9A4E3C4338F for ; Sun, 25 Jul 2021 19:58:04 +0000 (UTC) Received: from smtp3.osuosl.org (smtp3.osuosl.org [140.211.166.136]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 26FD060E0C for ; Sun, 25 Jul 2021 19:58:04 +0000 (UTC) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.4.1 mail.kernel.org 26FD060E0C Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=bootlin.com Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=busybox.net Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by smtp3.osuosl.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DC69D60731; Sun, 25 Jul 2021 19:58:03 +0000 (UTC) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at osuosl.org Received: from smtp3.osuosl.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (smtp3.osuosl.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id ToQ4GKJ1KAIa; Sun, 25 Jul 2021 19:58:03 +0000 (UTC) Received: from ash.osuosl.org (ash.osuosl.org [140.211.166.34]) by smtp3.osuosl.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3E8E76070E; Sun, 25 Jul 2021 19:58:02 +0000 (UTC) Received: from smtp4.osuosl.org (smtp4.osuosl.org [140.211.166.137]) by ash.osuosl.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E38D61BF405 for ; Sun, 25 Jul 2021 19:58:00 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by smtp4.osuosl.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DFD1D403A0 for ; Sun, 25 Jul 2021 19:58:00 +0000 (UTC) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at osuosl.org Received: from smtp4.osuosl.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (smtp4.osuosl.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id gFoh4hXDWnOE for ; Sun, 25 Jul 2021 19:58:00 +0000 (UTC) X-Greylist: domain auto-whitelisted by SQLgrey-1.8.0 Received: from relay12.mail.gandi.net (relay12.mail.gandi.net [217.70.178.232]) by smtp4.osuosl.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id BBFBD4039D for ; Sun, 25 Jul 2021 19:57:59 +0000 (UTC) Received: (Authenticated sender: thomas.petazzoni@bootlin.com) by relay12.mail.gandi.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 0AD14200002; Sun, 25 Jul 2021 19:57:57 +0000 (UTC) Date: Sun, 25 Jul 2021 21:57:56 +0200 From: Thomas Petazzoni To: Peter Seiderer Message-ID: <20210725215756.059e125f@windsurf> In-Reply-To: <20210620205607.25904-1-ps.report@gmx.net> References: <20210620205607.25904-1-ps.report@gmx.net> Organization: Bootlin X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.17.8 (GTK+ 2.24.33; x86_64-redhat-linux-gnu) MIME-Version: 1.0 Subject: Re: [Buildroot] [RFC v1 1/2] package/iptables: add option to enabel libipq build X-BeenThere: buildroot@busybox.net X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussion and development of buildroot List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: buildroot@buildroot.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Errors-To: buildroot-bounces@busybox.net Sender: "buildroot" On Sun, 20 Jun 2021 22:56:06 +0200 Peter Seiderer wrote: > - add option to enable libipq build > - as libipq.h includes linux/netfilter_ipv4/ip_queue.h install (not > provided by modern kernels otherwise?) > > Signed-off-by: Peter Seiderer Is it really a good idea to add an option for this library? Debian dropped installing libipq 5 years ago, as this library is deprecated: https://salsa.debian.org/pkg-netfilter-team/pkg-iptables/-/commit/bf21537d27ee72cc69ca0883059b315ceaf9737d Also in 2012, iptables developers said they would keep this library for 1.5-2 years: https://git.netfilter.org/iptables/commit/?id=a624e0a1b2d075253b599ababd4ea1351ef42b2a But then, when I look at the nrlsmf source code, I don't see any reference to libipq or ip_queue.h. Am I missing something ? Thanks, Thomas -- Thomas Petazzoni, co-owner and CEO, Bootlin Embedded Linux and Kernel engineering https://bootlin.com _______________________________________________ buildroot mailing list buildroot@busybox.net http://lists.busybox.net/mailman/listinfo/buildroot