From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-15.2 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,INCLUDES_CR_TRAILER,INCLUDES_PATCH, MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS,URIBL_BLOCKED,USER_AGENT_SANE_2 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E1DC3C4338F for ; Mon, 26 Jul 2021 21:57:03 +0000 (UTC) Received: from smtp3.osuosl.org (smtp3.osuosl.org [140.211.166.136]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 9EA7260F23 for ; Mon, 26 Jul 2021 21:57:03 +0000 (UTC) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.4.1 mail.kernel.org 9EA7260F23 Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=bootlin.com Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=busybox.net Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by smtp3.osuosl.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6CD41607BE; Mon, 26 Jul 2021 21:57:03 +0000 (UTC) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at osuosl.org Received: from smtp3.osuosl.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (smtp3.osuosl.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id d4JGluRlNnLr; Mon, 26 Jul 2021 21:57:02 +0000 (UTC) Received: from ash.osuosl.org (ash.osuosl.org [140.211.166.34]) by smtp3.osuosl.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CB440605EF; Mon, 26 Jul 2021 21:57:01 +0000 (UTC) Received: from smtp1.osuosl.org (smtp1.osuosl.org [140.211.166.138]) by ash.osuosl.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CB1541BF2F1 for ; Mon, 26 Jul 2021 21:57:00 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by smtp1.osuosl.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C76FF82730 for ; Mon, 26 Jul 2021 21:57:00 +0000 (UTC) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at osuosl.org Received: from smtp1.osuosl.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (smtp1.osuosl.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 6yOlqDV-Nl6O for ; Mon, 26 Jul 2021 21:57:00 +0000 (UTC) X-Greylist: domain auto-whitelisted by SQLgrey-1.8.0 Received: from relay12.mail.gandi.net (relay12.mail.gandi.net [217.70.178.232]) by smtp1.osuosl.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C2E0B826BF for ; Mon, 26 Jul 2021 21:56:59 +0000 (UTC) Received: (Authenticated sender: thomas.petazzoni@bootlin.com) by relay12.mail.gandi.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 2BE9A200002; Mon, 26 Jul 2021 21:56:56 +0000 (UTC) Date: Mon, 26 Jul 2021 23:56:55 +0200 From: Thomas Petazzoni To: Giulio Benetti Message-ID: <20210726235656.1df4ddeb@windsurf> In-Reply-To: <20210521140942.3032331-1-giulio.benetti@benettiengineering.com> References: <20210521140942.3032331-1-giulio.benetti@benettiengineering.com> Organization: Bootlin X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.17.8 (GTK+ 2.24.33; x86_64-redhat-linux-gnu) MIME-Version: 1.0 Subject: Re: [Buildroot] [PATCH v2] toolchain: remove binutils bug 21464 X-BeenThere: buildroot@busybox.net X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussion and development of buildroot List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: Michael Nosthoff , Maxim Kochetkov , buildroot@buildroot.org, Romain Naour , Matt Weber , Thomas De Schampheleire Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Errors-To: buildroot-bounces@busybox.net Sender: "buildroot" On Fri, 21 May 2021 16:09:42 +0200 Giulio Benetti wrote: > This bug has been fixed upstream and backported to buildroot binutils > package. So let's remove it from toolchain/Config.in and from packages > that are affected by it: > - libgeos > - postgis > - protobuf > > Signed-off-by: Giulio Benetti > --- > V1->V2: > * squashed 4 different patches into one > --- > package/libgeos/Config.in | 4 +--- > package/postgis/Config.in | 4 +--- > package/protobuf/Config.in | 1 - > toolchain/Config.in | 6 ------ > 4 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 13 deletions(-) In fact, no I reverted this patch. It depends on other patches to be applied first. This is an illustration of why you should *never* ever resend just a single patch out of a larger series. Even if only one patch is changed, please resend the entire series. Could you update your "Fix binutils bug 21464 and remove it" series and resend it? Thanks, Thomas -- Thomas Petazzoni, CTO, Bootlin Embedded Linux and Kernel engineering https://bootlin.com _______________________________________________ buildroot mailing list buildroot@busybox.net http://lists.busybox.net/mailman/listinfo/buildroot