From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-7.0 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_INVALID, DKIM_SIGNED,FREEMAIL_FORGED_FROMDOMAIN,FREEMAIL_FROM, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,INCLUDES_CR_TRAILER,MAILING_LIST_MULTI, SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS,URIBL_BLOCKED,USER_AGENT_SANE_2 autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 90970C4338F for ; Tue, 27 Jul 2021 20:43:49 +0000 (UTC) Received: from smtp2.osuosl.org (smtp2.osuosl.org [140.211.166.133]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 487DB60F9D for ; Tue, 27 Jul 2021 20:43:49 +0000 (UTC) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.4.1 mail.kernel.org 487DB60F9D Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=none dis=none) header.from=gmx.net Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=busybox.net Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by smtp2.osuosl.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 086FD40146; Tue, 27 Jul 2021 20:43:49 +0000 (UTC) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at osuosl.org Received: from smtp2.osuosl.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (smtp2.osuosl.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 68GrYGE2Siw4; Tue, 27 Jul 2021 20:43:48 +0000 (UTC) Received: from ash.osuosl.org (ash.osuosl.org [140.211.166.34]) by smtp2.osuosl.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 51B734013A; Tue, 27 Jul 2021 20:43:47 +0000 (UTC) Received: from smtp3.osuosl.org (smtp3.osuosl.org [140.211.166.136]) by ash.osuosl.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EAB561BF860 for ; Tue, 27 Jul 2021 20:43:45 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by smtp3.osuosl.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D6A3D6069E for ; Tue, 27 Jul 2021 20:43:45 +0000 (UTC) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at osuosl.org Authentication-Results: smtp3.osuosl.org (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=gmx.net Received: from smtp3.osuosl.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (smtp3.osuosl.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id cbKkTXz6Byws for ; Tue, 27 Jul 2021 20:43:45 +0000 (UTC) X-Greylist: domain auto-whitelisted by SQLgrey-1.8.0 Received: from mout.gmx.net (mout.gmx.net [212.227.15.19]) by smtp3.osuosl.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A0E196065C for ; Tue, 27 Jul 2021 20:43:44 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=gmx.net; s=badeba3b8450; t=1627418621; bh=TfmznLr33OjKXALR9O77fLvZBuoJALpivyzoHr4KtIw=; h=X-UI-Sender-Class:Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:In-Reply-To:References; b=hNuMdHyAUm09xjqcpnL/i1NiRnNYwQmw57z1T8nA52Pbkz+OzL+IgN1b/IT23NLSZ kIMg5wSsYyRjs/pUhJ/AwU4hMtpgtsex8t7gHbddEW6VpNParPD6hIrkiPyucsmz6O wIN4VqJHAwEWYTLsdvLwDSAFPl7fkgrby/6Bubbc= X-UI-Sender-Class: 01bb95c1-4bf8-414a-932a-4f6e2808ef9c Received: from localhost ([62.216.209.64]) by mail.gmx.net (mrgmx004 [212.227.17.190]) with ESMTPSA (Nemesis) id 1MiacH-1mo9Oc1Nwt-00fidn; Tue, 27 Jul 2021 22:43:41 +0200 Date: Tue, 27 Jul 2021 22:43:40 +0200 From: Peter Seiderer To: Thomas Petazzoni Message-ID: <20210727224340.0dbaffd6@gmx.net> In-Reply-To: <20210724094931.3e30dfeb@windsurf> References: <20210608194926.14477-1-ps.report@gmx.net> <20210608194926.14477-2-ps.report@gmx.net> <6e5aae0a-b4a0-edba-f817-ca6eabb05b64@mind.be> <20210724094931.3e30dfeb@windsurf> X-Mailer: Claws Mail 4.0.0 (GTK+ 3.24.30; x86_64-suse-linux-gnu) MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Provags-ID: V03:K1:/sp3qWxxN/oF1rzwX/CK9lJl5dfstQisnnCSh/92AG2wqJXW4Xj Rnz+8X2b1lfjIsrIfYp6q3vW3zTg7xn9IFR3f42uOn/dKOC8AcBUOqp2kN7GKQ6yn5V3crP DybQOL0zC1DkorVGMa/37O9ICuFCP8A0iG6R4feeFEpq6EWwEfcRKzF+0ewWMefum8c5eJ9 qtpDjYItLA+zSfRY0kfEQ== X-UI-Out-Filterresults: notjunk:1;V03:K0:nwCVMgEv7s8=:zbaVVIB2DOtlrHZcWkNary Cvig7yCZmAzJxVXhenEDuWGgRmlxa1P8WUtoxmdLLr5Ha7xlZpHOflIrvphiwt30qPtt1fktA ju3inRA9WUf6JSbsjMnxDYBZk2lY0LHQtsQt7Y5p/qVsJJxdkX9r6fBQMutHVJbuZYOzvoBlG ETW+JZMyUNHdVgjA3m+Ji8Z8OvNRgRipB9bDrV1gzKem6mlG6gXTbYO/OK7EWrkI/FYNvu75S rMC03LwjmF9VjOQy6/GoUgLf9hGnkwH4SSWraAjP4n4LS5y6XnAzA/5JV64NZmaZdWGSyX+9F IQjnIj2Cr00oW5G5NTbU8xG88R48B+rFLs95P2xr89qqegWXh0v7XfmA1TFDUHB8SXXStvc+Z DQb/hDULU/Gb2EGTHFJLKQkH/M7XRnZAwM6lEtCN1pd0XI87Vp/wn99DJTOJIdRdg0crlMCp5 0iNjwbNIfubs6HexnzPgBRuH8kqfLndGQU1xpz2iu3v2fBekDqQNKst3SEWXp8KqvLwO6HeO0 JKIU7tPGMdvB/U476kit87onx2r7cIoZTMRUCNPRwNgqs9vmuftKvf/rwQg0J1Ybf8QV+xS80 jfKwyyMHtymOw/Jv7zyqwSCrfDpQAhJuU0EouQvgT5gPThGtNqJH6KuJf8cZbSANd0UBAMOQE N416suphnDKdUHMrxFT1L/3JpMGHuIGZosNFgnh8PsLfZ10OiuiWb7bz2FGkXC2sbezVFn0aN 4INHXT/3tnVbfAj3ap/iFXWkTJyE2yZYqVDLgV1GUbuQbrYj8b5dEWS+Lq0OTdHwaT2rRonQv MaIu6HH3SCU2WD/SBJ4+e8FM0yEeNh0B4lY4zO5LYMHy4Iu0viouwSRroHDfTclCnb37H73b7 u2bIjv/uIIlB9VYqtU22ntBn1mG+qRK5jw4LXYdpig7yytA3Zu+yKTtxk66440X7i4d5isGzE UTeA/CSBop5dSj2+oG8BRnQv4GO0MuN8Pt8mVryRdRnuqzKzofrZV72MfQmbP6nRqyvxV172a pHhTi0PvsoW8oLyAg5VQwB4IjEGMAKAuUpfsHYp6Azzh7PL4Hbd74dN+qfqo+ty1BB7OEqq1U mXgkIkDRCelwMFEsPG17somOu+vQulirJAd Subject: Re: [Buildroot] [PATCH v1 2/2] package/libinput: bump version to 1.18.0 X-BeenThere: buildroot@busybox.net X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussion and development of buildroot List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: "Yann E . MORIN" , buildroot@buildroot.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Errors-To: buildroot-bounces@busybox.net Sender: "buildroot" Hello Arnout, Thomas, On Sat, 24 Jul 2021 09:49:31 +0200, Thomas Petazzoni wrote: > On Thu, 22 Jul 2021 23:18:56 +0200 > Arnout Vandecappelle wrote: > > > On 08/06/2021 21:49, Peter Seiderer wrote: > > > For details see [1]. > > > > > > [1] https://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/wayland-devel/2021-June/041849.html > > > > > > Signed-off-by: Peter Seiderer > > > > Why is this bump in two separate patches? If it's because 1.17.3 should be > > applied to the 2021.05 branch, then it's better to make two distinct patches, > > one for master that bumps directly to 1.18.0, and another for stable that is > > marked explicitly as such with --subject-prefix. Yes, this was the intention of the split..., will mark it more explicitly next time... > > Gah sorry, I'm only seeing this now after having applied the patches. > Peter also did the same (bump in several steps) libxmlrpc, so I was not > too concerned about this. Though I agree that your question makes sense. For libxmlrpc the same applies for the first patch..., the other two where split because they where tagged with code/stable and code/advanced, was not sure about the whole/complete bump but did not find a downside for the code/advanced one... Regards, Peter > > Best regards, > > Thomas _______________________________________________ buildroot mailing list buildroot@busybox.net http://lists.busybox.net/mailman/listinfo/buildroot