From: Thomas Petazzoni <thomas.petazzoni@bootlin.com>
To: Eugen Hristev <eugen.hristev@microchip.com>
Cc: "Yann E. MORIN" <yann.morin.1998@free.fr>, buildroot@buildroot.org
Subject: Re: [Buildroot] [PATCH] boot/at91bootstrap3: updated to released 4.0.0 final version
Date: Fri, 30 Jul 2021 23:42:34 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20210730234234.31bc6aa0@windsurf> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20210730103908.11270-1-eugen.hristev@microchip.com>
Hello Eugen,
On Fri, 30 Jul 2021 13:39:08 +0300
Eugen Hristev via buildroot <buildroot@busybox.net> wrote:
> Update to AT91Bootstrap 4.0.0 version.
>
> This package is now released under MIT license.
>
> Signed-off-by: Eugen Hristev <eugen.hristev@microchip.com>
Thanks for the patch.
> -AT91BOOTSTRAP3_LICENSE = Atmel License
> +AT91BOOTSTRAP3_LICENSE = MIT
While this change is correct for at91bootstrap 4.x, I don't think it's
true for at91bootstrap 3.x, so I suppose this should instead be
conditional?
The problem is... what should be the condition? Indeed, testing on
BR2_TARGET_AT91BOOTSTRAP3_LATEST_VERSION vs.
BR2_TARGET_AT91BOOTSTRAP3_LATEST_VERSION_3X is not working, because the
user can specify a custom Git or a custom tarball, and there we don't
know what version is used (3.x of 4.x).
I must admit I don't have a good idea here.
Best regards,
Thomas
--
Thomas Petazzoni, co-owner and CEO, Bootlin
Embedded Linux and Kernel engineering
https://bootlin.com
_______________________________________________
buildroot mailing list
buildroot@busybox.net
http://lists.busybox.net/mailman/listinfo/buildroot
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-07-30 21:42 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-07-30 10:39 [Buildroot] [PATCH] boot/at91bootstrap3: updated to released 4.0.0 final version Eugen Hristev via buildroot
2021-07-30 21:42 ` Thomas Petazzoni [this message]
2021-07-31 7:11 ` Yann E. MORIN
2021-07-31 8:14 ` Thomas Petazzoni
2021-08-03 8:26 ` Eugen.Hristev--- via buildroot
2021-08-02 6:57 ` Eugen.Hristev--- via buildroot
2021-08-02 16:37 ` Yann E. MORIN
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20210730234234.31bc6aa0@windsurf \
--to=thomas.petazzoni@bootlin.com \
--cc=buildroot@buildroot.org \
--cc=eugen.hristev@microchip.com \
--cc=yann.morin.1998@free.fr \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox