From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-5.2 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS, URIBL_BLOCKED,USER_AGENT_SANE_2 autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B0103C4338F for ; Sat, 7 Aug 2021 10:26:20 +0000 (UTC) Received: from smtp1.osuosl.org (smtp1.osuosl.org [140.211.166.138]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4B6A9610FB for ; Sat, 7 Aug 2021 10:26:20 +0000 (UTC) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.4.1 mail.kernel.org 4B6A9610FB Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=bootlin.com Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=busybox.net Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by smtp1.osuosl.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0912D839D8; Sat, 7 Aug 2021 10:26:20 +0000 (UTC) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at osuosl.org Received: from smtp1.osuosl.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (smtp1.osuosl.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 7sDYjtm0M9eZ; Sat, 7 Aug 2021 10:26:19 +0000 (UTC) Received: from ash.osuosl.org (ash.osuosl.org [140.211.166.34]) by smtp1.osuosl.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5D5F78378A; Sat, 7 Aug 2021 10:26:18 +0000 (UTC) Received: from smtp1.osuosl.org (smtp1.osuosl.org [140.211.166.138]) by ash.osuosl.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CFC1D1BF2F6 for ; Sat, 7 Aug 2021 10:26:16 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by smtp1.osuosl.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BD6878378A for ; Sat, 7 Aug 2021 10:26:16 +0000 (UTC) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at osuosl.org Received: from smtp1.osuosl.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (smtp1.osuosl.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id dhDpqvucEIeh for ; Sat, 7 Aug 2021 10:26:15 +0000 (UTC) X-Greylist: domain auto-whitelisted by SQLgrey-1.8.0 Received: from relay12.mail.gandi.net (relay12.mail.gandi.net [217.70.178.232]) by smtp1.osuosl.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 8720783759 for ; Sat, 7 Aug 2021 10:26:15 +0000 (UTC) Received: (Authenticated sender: thomas.petazzoni@bootlin.com) by relay12.mail.gandi.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 7F1FD200004; Sat, 7 Aug 2021 10:26:11 +0000 (UTC) Date: Sat, 7 Aug 2021 12:26:09 +0200 From: Thomas Petazzoni To: Edgar Bonet Message-ID: <20210807122609.2b3d3930@windsurf> In-Reply-To: <68ad9a9b-54a1-1f6a-88c3-d6c171340b70@grenoble.cnrs.fr> References: <20210807070519.BBD0882F39@smtp1.osuosl.org> <68ad9a9b-54a1-1f6a-88c3-d6c171340b70@grenoble.cnrs.fr> Organization: Bootlin X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.18.0 (GTK+ 2.24.33; x86_64-redhat-linux-gnu) MIME-Version: 1.0 Subject: [Buildroot] Microchip Buildroot defconfig issues: fixes needed X-BeenThere: buildroot@busybox.net X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussion and development of buildroot List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: buildroot@busybox.net, Ludovic Desroches , Biagio Montaruli Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Errors-To: buildroot-bounces@busybox.net Sender: "buildroot" Hello, Thanks Edgar for your investigation! On Sat, 7 Aug 2021 12:20:59 +0200 Edgar Bonet wrote: > Hello! > > On 2021-08-07, the autobuilder wrote: > > Detail of defconfig failures for master > > [list of 48 failing defconfigs] > > The 32 defconfigs that use AT91Bootstrap all failed. I just checked > their failure reasons. The following three failed before the build > started, because of check-dotconfig.py reporting missing entries in > .config: > > - microchip_sam9x60ek_mmc_dev_defconfig > - microchip_sama5d2_icp_mmc_defconfig > - microchip_sama5d2_icp_mmc_dev_defconfig I'll have a look into these. > - acmesystems_acqua_a5_256mb_defconfig > - acmesystems_acqua_a5_512mb_defconfig > - acmesystems_aria_g25_128mb_defconfig > - acmesystems_aria_g25_256mb_defconfig > - acmesystems_arietta_g25_128mb_defconfig > - acmesystems_arietta_g25_256mb_defconfig > - at91sam9260eknf_defconfig > - at91sam9g20dfc_defconfig > - at91sam9g45m10ek_defconfig > - at91sam9rlek_defconfig > - at91sam9x5ek_defconfig > - at91sam9x5ek_dev_defconfig > - at91sam9x5ek_mmc_defconfig > - at91sam9x5ek_mmc_dev_defconfig > - atmel_sama5d27_som1_ek_mmc_dev_defconfig > - atmel_sama5d2_xplained_mmc_defconfig > - atmel_sama5d2_xplained_mmc_dev_defconfig > - atmel_sama5d3_xplained_defconfig > - atmel_sama5d3_xplained_dev_defconfig > - atmel_sama5d3_xplained_mmc_defconfig > - atmel_sama5d3_xplained_mmc_dev_defconfig > - atmel_sama5d3xek_defconfig > - atmel_sama5d4_xplained_defconfig > - atmel_sama5d4_xplained_dev_defconfig > - atmel_sama5d4_xplained_mmc_defconfig > - atmel_sama5d4_xplained_mmc_dev_defconfig > - microchip_sam9x60ek_mmc_defconfig > - microchip_sama5d27_wlsom1_ek_mmc_defconfig > - microchip_sama5d27_wlsom1_ek_mmc_dev_defconfig > > Failed because of AT91Bootstrap issue #127, as described here: > http://lists.busybox.net/pipermail/buildroot/2021-August/620375.html Biagio, Ludovic, could you fix those issues on the acmesystems and atmel/microchip defconfigs ? If they are not fixed by the release (end of August), we would have to drop the failing defconfigs. Thanks a lot, Thomas -- Thomas Petazzoni, co-owner and CEO, Bootlin Embedded Linux and Kernel engineering https://bootlin.com _______________________________________________ buildroot mailing list buildroot@busybox.net http://lists.busybox.net/mailman/listinfo/buildroot