From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-5.2 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS, URIBL_BLOCKED,USER_AGENT_SANE_2 autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B36F1C4338F for ; Wed, 18 Aug 2021 21:55:01 +0000 (UTC) Received: from smtp2.osuosl.org (smtp2.osuosl.org [140.211.166.133]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4FACB610FD for ; Wed, 18 Aug 2021 21:55:01 +0000 (UTC) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.4.1 mail.kernel.org 4FACB610FD Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=bootlin.com Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=busybox.net Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by smtp2.osuosl.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 003FE4019A; Wed, 18 Aug 2021 21:55:01 +0000 (UTC) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at osuosl.org Received: from smtp2.osuosl.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (smtp2.osuosl.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id KUn82c7anRZA; Wed, 18 Aug 2021 21:54:56 +0000 (UTC) Received: from ash.osuosl.org (ash.osuosl.org [140.211.166.34]) by smtp2.osuosl.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AB308402DC; Wed, 18 Aug 2021 21:54:55 +0000 (UTC) Received: from smtp1.osuosl.org (smtp1.osuosl.org [140.211.166.138]) by ash.osuosl.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E4E411BF2C7 for ; Wed, 18 Aug 2021 21:54:45 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by smtp1.osuosl.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D3E7580BCF for ; Wed, 18 Aug 2021 21:54:45 +0000 (UTC) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at osuosl.org Received: from smtp1.osuosl.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (smtp1.osuosl.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id o0bx_tu0AzzE for ; Wed, 18 Aug 2021 21:54:41 +0000 (UTC) X-Greylist: domain auto-whitelisted by SQLgrey-1.8.0 Received: from relay5-d.mail.gandi.net (relay5-d.mail.gandi.net [217.70.183.197]) by smtp1.osuosl.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 895F980BCA for ; Wed, 18 Aug 2021 21:54:41 +0000 (UTC) Received: (Authenticated sender: thomas.petazzoni@bootlin.com) by relay5-d.mail.gandi.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 60ED31C0006; Wed, 18 Aug 2021 21:54:38 +0000 (UTC) Date: Wed, 18 Aug 2021 23:54:37 +0200 From: Thomas Petazzoni To: Adam Duskett Message-ID: <20210818235437.78a7826a@windsurf> In-Reply-To: References: <20210818202212.684857-1-thomas.petazzoni@bootlin.com> Organization: Bootlin X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.18.0 (GTK+ 2.24.33; x86_64-redhat-linux-gnu) MIME-Version: 1.0 Subject: Re: [Buildroot] [PATCH] package/sentry-cli: remove package X-BeenThere: buildroot@busybox.net X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussion and development of buildroot List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: Joseph Kogut , Buildroot List Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Errors-To: buildroot-bounces@busybox.net Sender: "buildroot" Hello Adam, On Wed, 18 Aug 2021 13:36:58 -0700 Adam Duskett wrote: > It seems like version 1.68.0 fixes the build failures. I have tested > two different > defconfigs that are on the failure list: > - bf7361dc482d8f3f97d523b7d56eabe5bc515ae8 > - 97aa03f497536462abc85011ba1c94874d18f237 > > And the new version doesn't produce the failures that are plaguing the > autobuilders. > > Instead of removing the package, I would suggest updating it to 1.68.0 instead. Thanks for looking into this. Did you confirm that you were able to reproduce the failures *before* the version bump ? One of the issue seems to because by the host-sentry-cli calling into Git, which would probably work with in-tree builds, but not out-of-tree builds for example. Another issue seems to be related to zlib being available on the host system or not. So to know if the 1.68.0 update fixes the issue, we need to make sure that you were able to reproduce the failures with the current version, in the same setup as the one you tested the version bump with. Thanks! Thomas -- Thomas Petazzoni, co-owner and CEO, Bootlin Embedded Linux and Kernel engineering https://bootlin.com _______________________________________________ buildroot mailing list buildroot@busybox.net http://lists.busybox.net/mailman/listinfo/buildroot