From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-15.3 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,INCLUDES_CR_TRAILER,INCLUDES_PATCH, MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS,USER_AGENT_SANE_2 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E544AC4338F for ; Thu, 19 Aug 2021 21:05:53 +0000 (UTC) Received: from smtp2.osuosl.org (smtp2.osuosl.org [140.211.166.133]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A99716108E for ; Thu, 19 Aug 2021 21:05:53 +0000 (UTC) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.4.1 mail.kernel.org A99716108E Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=bootlin.com Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=busybox.net Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by smtp2.osuosl.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7581E404E8; Thu, 19 Aug 2021 21:05:53 +0000 (UTC) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at osuosl.org Received: from smtp2.osuosl.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (smtp2.osuosl.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id L_poQ04-26mn; Thu, 19 Aug 2021 21:05:50 +0000 (UTC) Received: from ash.osuosl.org (ash.osuosl.org [140.211.166.34]) by smtp2.osuosl.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4F51E40176; Thu, 19 Aug 2021 21:05:49 +0000 (UTC) Received: from smtp2.osuosl.org (smtp2.osuosl.org [140.211.166.133]) by ash.osuosl.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DD6551BF4D5 for ; Thu, 19 Aug 2021 21:05:47 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by smtp2.osuosl.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CBCD740176 for ; Thu, 19 Aug 2021 21:05:47 +0000 (UTC) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at osuosl.org Received: from smtp2.osuosl.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (smtp2.osuosl.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id X4B01WATCpG8 for ; Thu, 19 Aug 2021 21:05:42 +0000 (UTC) X-Greylist: domain auto-whitelisted by SQLgrey-1.8.0 Received: from relay9-d.mail.gandi.net (relay9-d.mail.gandi.net [217.70.183.199]) by smtp2.osuosl.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 5C0AD4011B for ; Thu, 19 Aug 2021 21:05:42 +0000 (UTC) Received: (Authenticated sender: thomas.petazzoni@bootlin.com) by relay9-d.mail.gandi.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 9C042FF803; Thu, 19 Aug 2021 21:05:40 +0000 (UTC) Date: Thu, 19 Aug 2021 23:05:39 +0200 From: Thomas Petazzoni To: Fabrice Fontaine Message-ID: <20210819230539.16ac5e4f@windsurf> In-Reply-To: <20210805174252.2661314-1-fontaine.fabrice@gmail.com> References: <20210805174252.2661314-1-fontaine.fabrice@gmail.com> Organization: Bootlin X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.18.0 (GTK+ 2.24.33; x86_64-redhat-linux-gnu) MIME-Version: 1.0 Subject: Re: [Buildroot] [PATCH 1/2] package/mcrypt: drop package X-BeenThere: buildroot@busybox.net X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussion and development of buildroot List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: buildroot@buildroot.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Errors-To: buildroot-bounces@busybox.net Sender: "buildroot" Hello Fabrice, On Thu, 5 Aug 2021 19:42:51 +0200 Fabrice Fontaine wrote: > Drop mcrypt which is not maintained anymore (no release since 2008). > > Signed-off-by: Fabrice Fontaine > --- > Config.in.legacy | 7 ++ > package/Config.in | 1 - > package/mcrypt/0001-CVE-2012-4409.patch | 25 ------- > package/mcrypt/0002-CVE-2012-4426.patch | 35 --------- > package/mcrypt/0003-CVE-2012-4527.patch | 99 ------------------------- > package/mcrypt/0004-no-rpath.patch | 17 ----- > package/mcrypt/Config.in | 12 --- > package/mcrypt/mcrypt.hash | 3 - > package/mcrypt/mcrypt.mk | 24 ------ > 9 files changed, 7 insertions(+), 216 deletions(-) > delete mode 100644 package/mcrypt/0001-CVE-2012-4409.patch > delete mode 100644 package/mcrypt/0002-CVE-2012-4426.patch > delete mode 100644 package/mcrypt/0003-CVE-2012-4527.patch > delete mode 100644 package/mcrypt/0004-no-rpath.patch > delete mode 100644 package/mcrypt/Config.in > delete mode 100644 package/mcrypt/mcrypt.hash > delete mode 100644 package/mcrypt/mcrypt.mk Do we have a good reason to drop these packages? We have lots of packages with no upstream activity, and we drop them only when there is some particular issue. What prompted you to propose these packages for removal ? Thanks, Thomas -- Thomas Petazzoni, CTO, Bootlin Embedded Linux and Kernel engineering https://bootlin.com _______________________________________________ buildroot mailing list buildroot@busybox.net http://lists.busybox.net/mailman/listinfo/buildroot