From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7082CC433F5 for ; Fri, 8 Oct 2021 12:40:40 +0000 (UTC) Received: from smtp3.osuosl.org (smtp3.osuosl.org [140.211.166.136]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 9AE9C60FC2 for ; Fri, 8 Oct 2021 12:40:39 +0000 (UTC) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.4.1 mail.kernel.org 9AE9C60FC2 Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=bootlin.com Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=buildroot.org Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by smtp3.osuosl.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3AE686100E; Fri, 8 Oct 2021 12:40:39 +0000 (UTC) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at osuosl.org Received: from smtp3.osuosl.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (smtp3.osuosl.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id uTlbZjy7q7K2; Fri, 8 Oct 2021 12:40:38 +0000 (UTC) Received: from ash.osuosl.org (ash.osuosl.org [140.211.166.34]) by smtp3.osuosl.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AE8FF61001; Fri, 8 Oct 2021 12:40:37 +0000 (UTC) Received: from smtp4.osuosl.org (smtp4.osuosl.org [140.211.166.137]) by ash.osuosl.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A3CE71BF359 for ; Fri, 8 Oct 2021 12:40:35 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by smtp4.osuosl.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9315E4069F for ; Fri, 8 Oct 2021 12:40:35 +0000 (UTC) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at osuosl.org Received: from smtp4.osuosl.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (smtp4.osuosl.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id ED01mrBsoeLz for ; Fri, 8 Oct 2021 12:40:34 +0000 (UTC) X-Greylist: domain auto-whitelisted by SQLgrey-1.8.0 Received: from relay11.mail.gandi.net (relay11.mail.gandi.net [217.70.178.231]) by smtp4.osuosl.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 16BAD407FD for ; Fri, 8 Oct 2021 12:40:33 +0000 (UTC) Received: (Authenticated sender: thomas.petazzoni@bootlin.com) by relay11.mail.gandi.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 80C2D100009; Fri, 8 Oct 2021 12:40:30 +0000 (UTC) Date: Fri, 8 Oct 2021 14:40:29 +0200 From: Thomas Petazzoni To: Kamel Bouhara Message-ID: <20211008144029.51d226d7@windsurf> In-Reply-To: References: <20210928223754.3398867-1-kamel.bouhara@bootlin.com> <20211001161354.0bc8c1f1@windsurf> Organization: Bootlin X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.18.0 (GTK+ 2.24.33; x86_64-redhat-linux-gnu) MIME-Version: 1.0 Subject: Re: [Buildroot] [PATCH v2 1/7] package/opengl/libgbm: new virtual package X-BeenThere: buildroot@buildroot.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussion and development of buildroot List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: Paul Kocialkowski , Bernd Kuhls , buildroot@buildroot.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Errors-To: buildroot-bounces@buildroot.org Sender: "buildroot" Hello Kamel, On Thu, 7 Oct 2021 11:35:34 +0200 Kamel Bouhara wrote: > > Question: do we have in the tree some libgbm implementation that > > support neither > > BR2_PACKAGE_LIBGBM_HAS_FEATURE_FORMAT_MODIFIER_PLANE_COUNT nor > > BR2_PACKAGE_LIBGBM_HAS_FEATURE_DMA_BUF ? > > So far, the dma buf feature (mesa gbm v10) is provided by every > implementation I compared (gcnano, ti, sunxi, imx-gpu). So what made you think we need to identify this feature separately from others? The whole point of this "feature" mechanism is to be able to distinguish the different GBM implementations in the features they provide. Thanks! Thomas -- Thomas Petazzoni, co-owner and CEO, Bootlin Embedded Linux and Kernel engineering and training https://bootlin.com _______________________________________________ buildroot mailing list buildroot@buildroot.org https://lists.buildroot.org/mailman/listinfo/buildroot