From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F3BCDC433EF for ; Fri, 8 Oct 2021 13:10:22 +0000 (UTC) Received: from smtp4.osuosl.org (smtp4.osuosl.org [140.211.166.137]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 8622A6103C for ; Fri, 8 Oct 2021 13:10:22 +0000 (UTC) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.4.1 mail.kernel.org 8622A6103C Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=bootlin.com Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=buildroot.org Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by smtp4.osuosl.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2CFEF40964; Fri, 8 Oct 2021 13:10:22 +0000 (UTC) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at osuosl.org Received: from smtp4.osuosl.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (smtp4.osuosl.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id LSrEziweXAZ2; Fri, 8 Oct 2021 13:10:20 +0000 (UTC) Received: from ash.osuosl.org (ash.osuosl.org [140.211.166.34]) by smtp4.osuosl.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 71B8940941; Fri, 8 Oct 2021 13:10:19 +0000 (UTC) Received: from smtp1.osuosl.org (smtp1.osuosl.org [140.211.166.138]) by ash.osuosl.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 33BA11BF591 for ; Fri, 8 Oct 2021 13:10:18 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by smtp1.osuosl.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 23C3E83E1C for ; Fri, 8 Oct 2021 13:10:18 +0000 (UTC) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at osuosl.org Received: from smtp1.osuosl.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (smtp1.osuosl.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id otJosT8-32sZ for ; Fri, 8 Oct 2021 13:10:14 +0000 (UTC) X-Greylist: domain auto-whitelisted by SQLgrey-1.8.0 Received: from relay3-d.mail.gandi.net (relay3-d.mail.gandi.net [217.70.183.195]) by smtp1.osuosl.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 6A0D483D2A for ; Fri, 8 Oct 2021 13:10:14 +0000 (UTC) Received: (Authenticated sender: thomas.petazzoni@bootlin.com) by relay3-d.mail.gandi.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id E4C8E60009; Fri, 8 Oct 2021 13:10:10 +0000 (UTC) Date: Fri, 8 Oct 2021 15:10:10 +0200 From: Thomas Petazzoni To: Paul Kocialkowski Message-ID: <20211008151010.41e58d0b@windsurf> In-Reply-To: References: <20210928223754.3398867-1-kamel.bouhara@bootlin.com> <20211001161354.0bc8c1f1@windsurf> <20211008144029.51d226d7@windsurf> Organization: Bootlin X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.18.0 (GTK+ 2.24.33; x86_64-redhat-linux-gnu) MIME-Version: 1.0 Subject: Re: [Buildroot] [PATCH v2 1/7] package/opengl/libgbm: new virtual package X-BeenThere: buildroot@buildroot.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussion and development of buildroot List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: Bernd Kuhls , Kamel Bouhara , buildroot@buildroot.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Errors-To: buildroot-bounces@buildroot.org Sender: "buildroot" On Fri, 8 Oct 2021 14:47:45 +0200 Paul Kocialkowski wrote: > > So what made you think we need to identify this feature separately from > > others? > > I seem to recall that earlier versions of the sunxi blobs didn't have > dma-buf support, and they eventually released some that did. > > So my two cents would be that dma-buf is not part of the "base" set of > features from the GBM API and it makes sense to recognize it as an > additional feature. Thanks, useful feedback (should I say "as usual" ?). Should perhaps be captured "somewhere" (commit log ? comment above the feature option ?). Thanks! Thomas -- Thomas Petazzoni, co-owner and CEO, Bootlin Embedded Linux and Kernel engineering and training https://bootlin.com _______________________________________________ buildroot mailing list buildroot@buildroot.org https://lists.buildroot.org/mailman/listinfo/buildroot