From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 00267C433EF for ; Sun, 24 Oct 2021 14:09:48 +0000 (UTC) Received: from smtp3.osuosl.org (smtp3.osuosl.org [140.211.166.136]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B33CA60F45 for ; Sun, 24 Oct 2021 14:09:48 +0000 (UTC) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.4.1 mail.kernel.org B33CA60F45 Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=bootlin.com Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=buildroot.org Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by smtp3.osuosl.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 843876081C; Sun, 24 Oct 2021 14:09:48 +0000 (UTC) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at osuosl.org Received: from smtp3.osuosl.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (smtp3.osuosl.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id gKh_WC1H6xD3; Sun, 24 Oct 2021 14:09:47 +0000 (UTC) Received: from ash.osuosl.org (ash.osuosl.org [140.211.166.34]) by smtp3.osuosl.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EA54B606A7; Sun, 24 Oct 2021 14:09:46 +0000 (UTC) Received: from smtp4.osuosl.org (smtp4.osuosl.org [140.211.166.137]) by ash.osuosl.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8A2F61BF47D for ; Sun, 24 Oct 2021 14:09:45 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by smtp4.osuosl.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 79F26401A6 for ; Sun, 24 Oct 2021 14:09:45 +0000 (UTC) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at osuosl.org Received: from smtp4.osuosl.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (smtp4.osuosl.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Hex8obi8fEkp for ; Sun, 24 Oct 2021 14:09:44 +0000 (UTC) X-Greylist: domain auto-whitelisted by SQLgrey-1.8.0 Received: from relay10.mail.gandi.net (relay10.mail.gandi.net [217.70.178.230]) by smtp4.osuosl.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 7485A40192 for ; Sun, 24 Oct 2021 14:09:44 +0000 (UTC) Received: (Authenticated sender: thomas.petazzoni@bootlin.com) by relay10.mail.gandi.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id A5AD1240004; Sun, 24 Oct 2021 14:09:41 +0000 (UTC) Date: Sun, 24 Oct 2021 16:09:40 +0200 From: Thomas Petazzoni To: Giulio Benetti Message-ID: <20211024160940.4d4b6706@windsurf> In-Reply-To: <20211021220023.68288-1-giulio.benetti@benettiengineering.com> References: <20211021220023.68288-1-giulio.benetti@benettiengineering.com> Organization: Bootlin X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.18.0 (GTK+ 2.24.33; x86_64-redhat-linux-gnu) MIME-Version: 1.0 Subject: Re: [Buildroot] [PATCH 0/8] Olimex boards u-boot/linux update X-BeenThere: buildroot@buildroot.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussion and development of buildroot List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: Luca Ceresoli , Leon Anavi , Jagan Teki , buildroot@buildroot.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Errors-To: buildroot-bounces@buildroot.org Sender: "buildroot" Hello Giulio, On Fri, 22 Oct 2021 00:00:15 +0200 Giulio Benetti wrote: > Giulio Benetti (8): > configs/olimex_a10_olinuxino: bump to Linux kernel 5.14.13 and u-boot > 2021.10 > configs/olimex_a10_olinuxino: use FPU NEON strategy > configs/olimex_a13_olinuxino: bump to Linux kernel 5.14.13 and u-boot > 2021.10 > configs/olimex_a13_olinuxino: use FPU NEON strategy > configs/olimex_a20_olinuxino_lime2: bump to Linux kernel 5.14.13 and > u-boot 2021.10 > configs/olimex_a20_olinuxino_lime: bump to Linux kernel 5.14.13 and > u-boot 2021.10 > configs/olimex_a20_olinuxino_micro: bump to Linux kernel 5.14.13 and > u-boot 2021.10 > configs/olimex_a33_olinuxino: bump to Linux kernel 5.14.13 and u-boot > 2021.10 I have applied all the patches bumping U-Boot/Linux, I hope that you were able to test them on real hardware. Make sure to monitor the next Gitlab CI build results to see if there's any new build failure. However, for the two patches enabling NEON as the FPU, I marked them as rejected. Indeed, using NEON as the FPU is not always a good idea, as it explained in the Config.in.help text: This option allows to use the NEON SIMD unit, as available in some ARMv7 processors, as a floating-point unit. It should however be noted that using NEON for floating point operations doesn't provide a complete compatibility with the IEEE 754. Best regards, Thomas Petazzoni -- Thomas Petazzoni, co-owner and CEO, Bootlin Embedded Linux and Kernel engineering and training https://bootlin.com _______________________________________________ buildroot mailing list buildroot@buildroot.org https://lists.buildroot.org/mailman/listinfo/buildroot