From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from smtp1.osuosl.org (smtp1.osuosl.org [140.211.166.138]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D7C8BC433EF for ; Tue, 19 Apr 2022 18:43:54 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by smtp1.osuosl.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3CE1183323; Tue, 19 Apr 2022 18:43:54 +0000 (UTC) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at osuosl.org Received: from smtp1.osuosl.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (smtp1.osuosl.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id R7paC_N3CY-T; Tue, 19 Apr 2022 18:43:53 +0000 (UTC) Received: from ash.osuosl.org (ash.osuosl.org [140.211.166.34]) by smtp1.osuosl.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5B603831D6; Tue, 19 Apr 2022 18:43:52 +0000 (UTC) Received: from smtp3.osuosl.org (smtp3.osuosl.org [140.211.166.136]) by ash.osuosl.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5D2401BF873 for ; Tue, 19 Apr 2022 18:43:50 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by smtp3.osuosl.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 473D260797 for ; Tue, 19 Apr 2022 18:43:50 +0000 (UTC) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at osuosl.org Authentication-Results: smtp3.osuosl.org (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=bootlin.com Received: from smtp3.osuosl.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (smtp3.osuosl.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 55p39JffC0iX for ; Tue, 19 Apr 2022 18:43:49 +0000 (UTC) X-Greylist: domain auto-whitelisted by SQLgrey-1.8.0 Received: from relay1-d.mail.gandi.net (relay1-d.mail.gandi.net [217.70.183.193]) by smtp3.osuosl.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 0694160A9F for ; Tue, 19 Apr 2022 18:43:48 +0000 (UTC) Received: (Authenticated sender: thomas.petazzoni@bootlin.com) by mail.gandi.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id C04DB240005; Tue, 19 Apr 2022 18:43:45 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=bootlin.com; s=gm1; t=1650393826; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: content-transfer-encoding:content-transfer-encoding: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=JhYZMfADVDqFlmPC4Nyd/HEFk/LsSnErLUE+l7dicEE=; b=nCFZobIoJoCUrwIuGW82IyvTKD9I23Hkd9y+u4b31tmFb3IPji+1gmxi/K3ntgc1VkGG91 HCMYkcF3vF8ixOnNJUleGiRkltyzKdbeepj/wOeuLi7lrwdZ4r2/MJX7tagm+6xOMmKtvi ce1N0nzQ7m8u3+FBT1vda0t08C7OmNPq28Mf+ehjQpe4VDwIctq/Qx1ILqNmeaEDLxLu4H TDVXPny7n5UhsHoCfK9/QfcUaSFcfKzPv0Spa9e6RaoJ+aRsDGaBMV2VhQmAuFKwvmQkdv uxQ8kFqLqJUKrQiIpwmJk+7II0VbR3ndxOelaFcNh9DBAnHMRdtMa0Sti2XeQw== Date: Tue, 19 Apr 2022 20:43:41 +0200 To: Francis Laniel Message-ID: <20220419204341.0adf3f55@windsurf> In-Reply-To: <12997361.uLZWGnKmhe@pwmachine> References: <2098999.irdbgypaU6@pwmachine> <20220417104244.6d681b10@windsurf> <12997361.uLZWGnKmhe@pwmachine> Organization: Bootlin X-Mailer: Claws Mail 4.0.0 (GTK+ 3.24.31; x86_64-redhat-linux-gnu) MIME-Version: 1.0 Subject: Re: [Buildroot] [autobuild.buildroot.net] Your daily results for 2022-04-14 X-BeenThere: buildroot@buildroot.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussion and development of buildroot List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , From: Thomas Petazzoni via buildroot Reply-To: Thomas Petazzoni Cc: "Yann E. MORIN" , "buildroot@buildroot.org" Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Errors-To: buildroot-bounces@buildroot.org Sender: "buildroot" On Tue, 19 Apr 2022 18:41:44 +0100 Francis Laniel wrote: > I think upstream code has actually a problem buildroot test infrastructure > highlighted. > So, from my understanding, the best solution would be to patch upstream > libbpf. > Indeed, I do not think adding a buildroot package will solve this problem. > > Were you suggesting than by adding a buildroot package we could add a local > patch to fix this behavior? What I meant is that pahole bundles libbpf as a git submodule, but can also use an external libbpf. In the context of Buildroot, we would very much prefer to have a separate host-libbpf package, with host-pahole depending on it (and not using its own copy of libbpf). Best regards, Thomas -- Thomas Petazzoni, co-owner and CEO, Bootlin Embedded Linux and Kernel engineering and training https://bootlin.com _______________________________________________ buildroot mailing list buildroot@buildroot.org https://lists.buildroot.org/mailman/listinfo/buildroot