From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from smtp4.osuosl.org (smtp4.osuosl.org [140.211.166.137]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 34180C433F5 for ; Wed, 27 Apr 2022 08:31:25 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by smtp4.osuosl.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CB88A41976; Wed, 27 Apr 2022 08:31:24 +0000 (UTC) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at osuosl.org Received: from smtp4.osuosl.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (smtp4.osuosl.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id PPQiW60q-sSm; Wed, 27 Apr 2022 08:31:23 +0000 (UTC) Received: from ash.osuosl.org (ash.osuosl.org [140.211.166.34]) by smtp4.osuosl.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8719C41938; Wed, 27 Apr 2022 08:31:22 +0000 (UTC) Received: from smtp3.osuosl.org (smtp3.osuosl.org [140.211.166.136]) by ash.osuosl.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9E7E91BF947 for ; Wed, 27 Apr 2022 08:31:21 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by smtp3.osuosl.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 97A5860E0B for ; Wed, 27 Apr 2022 08:31:21 +0000 (UTC) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at osuosl.org Authentication-Results: smtp3.osuosl.org (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=bootlin.com Received: from smtp3.osuosl.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (smtp3.osuosl.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id lv_rGFXH1IbI for ; Wed, 27 Apr 2022 08:31:20 +0000 (UTC) X-Greylist: domain auto-whitelisted by SQLgrey-1.8.0 Received: from relay10.mail.gandi.net (relay10.mail.gandi.net [217.70.178.230]) by smtp3.osuosl.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 7C42060B70 for ; Wed, 27 Apr 2022 08:31:20 +0000 (UTC) Received: (Authenticated sender: thomas.petazzoni@bootlin.com) by mail.gandi.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 6B8DB240011; Wed, 27 Apr 2022 08:31:04 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=bootlin.com; s=gm1; t=1651048276; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: content-transfer-encoding:content-transfer-encoding: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=FUJDyYcl6Cb6Ss9VseQ3Vlrmsmf2/35UTv7mFEmpjS0=; b=fgPUWN3GIWX0TiCAf9XlLFPLqZl8kCKXv6Z2TS7XY1PDIXzM4KW7cMJmA2etg0CoQGvU10 OFku7qs7fODABKaWToBiuBTD2mS/sq7goSYhTziuSMlBrtgonUtvvIyTcQ8RPHV4ODNaMO bSB0lCf3CIUFNfGVpQKMzHkwY9c4bTTk6XlrUXgJyReXL70YY8g8oVu/XmRE3wyF2XYZeJ 1GxACdDQOyo4zW/6tE1yu8HYisfJp771vVKy9/AyJYxYdzrzbXDGnw9xVIqSTso69uL7sU ldm2Q/1B1E5gABWZiXQLWqQE1qXhmS2gtMaa5A9QDhX3S+5Nm6brLG5YnllGRg== Date: Wed, 27 Apr 2022 10:31:02 +0200 To: James Hilliard Message-ID: <20220427103102.7f934c1f@windsurf> In-Reply-To: <20220427035039.1664864-1-james.hilliard1@gmail.com> References: <20220427035039.1664864-1-james.hilliard1@gmail.com> Organization: Bootlin X-Mailer: Claws Mail 4.0.0 (GTK+ 3.24.31; x86_64-redhat-linux-gnu) MIME-Version: 1.0 Subject: Re: [Buildroot] [PATCH 1/1] package/python3: drop libressl support X-BeenThere: buildroot@buildroot.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussion and development of buildroot List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , From: Thomas Petazzoni via buildroot Reply-To: Thomas Petazzoni Cc: Asaf Kahlon , buildroot@buildroot.org, "Yann E. MORIN" Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Errors-To: buildroot-bounces@buildroot.org Sender: "buildroot" Hello James, On Tue, 26 Apr 2022 21:50:39 -0600 James Hilliard wrote: > Libressl is no longer supported as of python 3.10. > > See: https://peps.python.org/pep-0644/#libressl > > Fixes: > - http://autobuild.buildroot.net/results/a16/a160cfdc9dfc036c4dc41af1c796f8838d91c573 > > Signed-off-by: James Hilliard Thanks for your patch. I think it raises one question: is libressl still relevant? Should we still support it? My understanding was that it is not really a successful fork, and in the end, openssl has mostly caught up and remains the de-facto standard implementation. See https://lwn.net/Articles/841664/. I don't have a very well-informed opinion, but perhaps we should think about this? Thomas -- Thomas Petazzoni, co-owner and CEO, Bootlin Embedded Linux and Kernel engineering and training https://bootlin.com _______________________________________________ buildroot mailing list buildroot@buildroot.org https://lists.buildroot.org/mailman/listinfo/buildroot