From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from smtp3.osuosl.org (smtp3.osuosl.org [140.211.166.136]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4674CC433EF for ; Thu, 28 Apr 2022 23:02:23 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by smtp3.osuosl.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EA6F8611AE; Thu, 28 Apr 2022 23:02:22 +0000 (UTC) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at osuosl.org Received: from smtp3.osuosl.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (smtp3.osuosl.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id wbNAdKXmJeAk; Thu, 28 Apr 2022 23:02:22 +0000 (UTC) Received: from ash.osuosl.org (ash.osuosl.org [140.211.166.34]) by smtp3.osuosl.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DCFA2611A8; Thu, 28 Apr 2022 23:02:20 +0000 (UTC) Received: from smtp1.osuosl.org (smtp1.osuosl.org [140.211.166.138]) by ash.osuosl.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 554471BF2E4 for ; Thu, 28 Apr 2022 23:02:19 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by smtp1.osuosl.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4BB9E830E2 for ; Thu, 28 Apr 2022 23:02:19 +0000 (UTC) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at osuosl.org Authentication-Results: smtp1.osuosl.org (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=free.fr Received: from smtp1.osuosl.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (smtp1.osuosl.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id cKwQwPKA3yi6 for ; Thu, 28 Apr 2022 23:02:18 +0000 (UTC) X-Greylist: domain auto-whitelisted by SQLgrey-1.8.0 Received: from smtp4-g21.free.fr (smtp4-g21.free.fr [IPv6:2a01:e0c:1:1599::13]) by smtp1.osuosl.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 1E8288302F for ; Thu, 28 Apr 2022 23:02:18 +0000 (UTC) Received: from ymorin.is-a-geek.org (unknown [IPv6:2a01:cb19:8b51:cb00:dcb4:7861:786a:5693]) (Authenticated sender: yann.morin.1998@free.fr) by smtp4-g21.free.fr (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 516E119F553; Fri, 29 Apr 2022 01:02:10 +0200 (CEST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=free.fr; s=smtp-20201208; t=1651186934; bh=vvw7d0EP9Xv+Q9uxNv3tHFtjxhzg/ZzcveLMMjdaVao=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:References:In-Reply-To:From; b=Q+i0kYKjuGTDFC3SjiUPOJNr13Ea8+wuyCBteQ8EijPS7jUOR8g6xEswf3dlJHDz+ 8yh944n98KaBzQh127qZiNl43ZQvR83VZf37uPO+4LOY8YPx4p675EsmB+eafrPavn ox4vkrJpsVan7ToJHoFYrBUHQgf6e28guOPGp77Y23FDn2jLnxKVInAfPoeIkUDOgH wfbKxipqYRQoQoGp5+0nHdYQK2vlQly134qdtf66S9Ub91yFPOCZg44BRlBFujwQDz 2BeMg8JnmH81OH4Dcbi6X2G2sPHWzmbDzMZLdrjfzC1l1aQlcEt+318qQC1pyGpJ3I 0hL0N4vpR2t4w== Received: by ymorin.is-a-geek.org (sSMTP sendmail emulation); Fri, 29 Apr 2022 01:02:10 +0200 Date: Fri, 29 Apr 2022 01:02:10 +0200 From: "Yann E. MORIN" To: Thomas Petazzoni Message-ID: <20220428230210.GL3624965@scaer> References: <20220428205548.524402-1-thomas.petazzoni@bootlin.com> <20220428205548.524402-4-thomas.petazzoni@bootlin.com> <20220428215220.GI3624965@scaer> <20220429000039.23e1a1fe@windsurf> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20220429000039.23e1a1fe@windsurf> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.22 (2013-10-16) Subject: Re: [Buildroot] [PATCH v3 4/4] package/binutils: drop version 2.32 X-BeenThere: buildroot@buildroot.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussion and development of buildroot List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: Giulio Benetti , Romain Naour , Buildroot List Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Errors-To: buildroot-bounces@buildroot.org Sender: "buildroot" Thomas, All, On 2022-04-29 00:00 +0200, Thomas Petazzoni spake thusly: > On Thu, 28 Apr 2022 23:52:20 +0200 > "Yann E. MORIN" wrote: > > > I was considering on not applying that one, so we could have a fallback > > in case there were runtime issues reported with newer binutils (I could > > only build-test your series, I lack a noMMU target). > > > > But if that happens to be the case, we can revert this patch quite > > easily. > > > > so, applied to master, thanks. > > Really if people still need to use binutils 2.32 and none of the newer > binutils version work for FLAT, I would call FLAT an unmaintained > use-case, which should lead us to drop support for it rather than > keeping an old binutils version around. True. > I don't know if there's an easy way to test an ARM noMMU build in Qemu. > https://xpack.github.io/qemu-arm/ which is a fork of Qemu, seems to > emulate STM32F429I-Discovery, which we have support for in Buildroot. > Not clear if the source is available, but since Qemu is GPLv2, I guess > the source code for this fork should be available somewhere. https://github.com/xpack-dev-tools/qemu-arm-xpack >From the README: Easy install The easiest way to install QEMU Arm is using the binary xPack, available as @xpack-dev-tools/qemu-arm from the npmjs.com registry. WTF? The qemu fork seems to be there: https://github.com/xpack-dev-tools/qemu Regards, Yann E. MORIN. > Best regards, > > Thomas > -- > Thomas Petazzoni, co-owner and CEO, Bootlin > Embedded Linux and Kernel engineering and training > https://bootlin.com -- .-----------------.--------------------.------------------.--------------------. | Yann E. MORIN | Real-Time Embedded | /"\ ASCII RIBBON | Erics' conspiracy: | | +33 662 376 056 | Software Designer | \ / CAMPAIGN | ___ | | +33 561 099 427 `------------.-------: X AGAINST | \e/ There is no | | http://ymorin.is-a-geek.org/ | _/*\_ | / \ HTML MAIL | v conspiracy. | '------------------------------^-------^------------------^--------------------' _______________________________________________ buildroot mailing list buildroot@buildroot.org https://lists.buildroot.org/mailman/listinfo/buildroot