From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from smtp4.osuosl.org (smtp4.osuosl.org [140.211.166.137]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 54717C433F5 for ; Thu, 28 Apr 2022 22:00:48 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by smtp4.osuosl.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B2D3D41BEA; Thu, 28 Apr 2022 22:00:47 +0000 (UTC) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at osuosl.org Received: from smtp4.osuosl.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (smtp4.osuosl.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id OaEVj2cti4k8; Thu, 28 Apr 2022 22:00:46 +0000 (UTC) Received: from ash.osuosl.org (ash.osuosl.org [140.211.166.34]) by smtp4.osuosl.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9086C41B98; Thu, 28 Apr 2022 22:00:45 +0000 (UTC) Received: from smtp4.osuosl.org (smtp4.osuosl.org [140.211.166.137]) by ash.osuosl.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B19DA1BF36D for ; Thu, 28 Apr 2022 22:00:43 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by smtp4.osuosl.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AE55F41B98 for ; Thu, 28 Apr 2022 22:00:43 +0000 (UTC) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at osuosl.org Received: from smtp4.osuosl.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (smtp4.osuosl.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id HvTmMOcTb8W9 for ; Thu, 28 Apr 2022 22:00:42 +0000 (UTC) X-Greylist: domain auto-whitelisted by SQLgrey-1.8.0 Received: from relay2-d.mail.gandi.net (relay2-d.mail.gandi.net [217.70.183.194]) by smtp4.osuosl.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 1ECEF41B6B for ; Thu, 28 Apr 2022 22:00:41 +0000 (UTC) Received: (Authenticated sender: thomas.petazzoni@bootlin.com) by mail.gandi.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 2B5F740003; Thu, 28 Apr 2022 22:00:40 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=bootlin.com; s=gm1; t=1651183240; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: content-transfer-encoding:content-transfer-encoding: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=jyq48hpZ+mRM+m20RPhx/sTllXbX7oUIgjvzHJMQ6KI=; b=jfb1hs3UT3i2qPuMW2IEpvohkr4yQYwglBmGOhKQ5nkCAcrjsYEMjnXA6llPc3iNZh1Oeh hlq5sIW2aufIKg5K4UnnR2m9EcgAUDfiVjNJtte+ViqaQz/zQaq7MltR9AUFnN8RcYeokG fe0O2r0YUPMmc6/N2bWFyQE9IghuHspUzvsXE7f0t8p2+ycjA3gE68qplSmmf6/tPL7kit ayFG3Ng63eCtIvvFq5rvMGLLnZXCg9xnYK31hLs7DdtIvcfdzauUoDna2TNL1MfjM7aGjy kGZ3vn+Ao3w2tl72qwUzzHDaRqpVotPqeF7Sve/nS6nYWa1t/4HiFl7wGpzhzg== Date: Fri, 29 Apr 2022 00:00:39 +0200 To: "Yann E. MORIN" Message-ID: <20220429000039.23e1a1fe@windsurf> In-Reply-To: <20220428215220.GI3624965@scaer> References: <20220428205548.524402-1-thomas.petazzoni@bootlin.com> <20220428205548.524402-4-thomas.petazzoni@bootlin.com> <20220428215220.GI3624965@scaer> Organization: Bootlin X-Mailer: Claws Mail 4.0.0 (GTK+ 3.24.31; x86_64-redhat-linux-gnu) MIME-Version: 1.0 Subject: Re: [Buildroot] [PATCH v3 4/4] package/binutils: drop version 2.32 X-BeenThere: buildroot@buildroot.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussion and development of buildroot List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , From: Thomas Petazzoni via buildroot Reply-To: Thomas Petazzoni Cc: Giulio Benetti , Romain Naour , Buildroot List Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Errors-To: buildroot-bounces@buildroot.org Sender: "buildroot" On Thu, 28 Apr 2022 23:52:20 +0200 "Yann E. MORIN" wrote: > I was considering on not applying that one, so we could have a fallback > in case there were runtime issues reported with newer binutils (I could > only build-test your series, I lack a noMMU target). > > But if that happens to be the case, we can revert this patch quite > easily. > > so, applied to master, thanks. Really if people still need to use binutils 2.32 and none of the newer binutils version work for FLAT, I would call FLAT an unmaintained use-case, which should lead us to drop support for it rather than keeping an old binutils version around. I don't know if there's an easy way to test an ARM noMMU build in Qemu. https://xpack.github.io/qemu-arm/ which is a fork of Qemu, seems to emulate STM32F429I-Discovery, which we have support for in Buildroot. Not clear if the source is available, but since Qemu is GPLv2, I guess the source code for this fork should be available somewhere. Best regards, Thomas -- Thomas Petazzoni, co-owner and CEO, Bootlin Embedded Linux and Kernel engineering and training https://bootlin.com _______________________________________________ buildroot mailing list buildroot@buildroot.org https://lists.buildroot.org/mailman/listinfo/buildroot