From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from smtp3.osuosl.org (smtp3.osuosl.org [140.211.166.136]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id CB67FC00144 for ; Fri, 29 Jul 2022 09:43:01 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by smtp3.osuosl.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1EB5F6105D; Fri, 29 Jul 2022 09:43:01 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 smtp3.osuosl.org 1EB5F6105D X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at osuosl.org Received: from smtp3.osuosl.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (smtp3.osuosl.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id AUHKmZcANHzL; Fri, 29 Jul 2022 09:43:00 +0000 (UTC) Received: from ash.osuosl.org (ash.osuosl.org [140.211.166.34]) by smtp3.osuosl.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4CC7F60E3C; Fri, 29 Jul 2022 09:42:59 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 smtp3.osuosl.org 4CC7F60E3C Received: from smtp1.osuosl.org (smtp1.osuosl.org [140.211.166.138]) by ash.osuosl.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 83C5D1BF339 for ; Fri, 29 Jul 2022 09:42:57 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by smtp1.osuosl.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 09E6683F54 for ; Fri, 29 Jul 2022 09:42:57 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 smtp1.osuosl.org 09E6683F54 X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at osuosl.org Received: from smtp1.osuosl.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (smtp1.osuosl.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id dunW59EADB0F for ; Fri, 29 Jul 2022 09:42:56 +0000 (UTC) X-Greylist: from auto-whitelisted by SQLgrey-1.8.0 DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 smtp1.osuosl.org 9DFDE8250B Received: from relay7-d.mail.gandi.net (relay7-d.mail.gandi.net [IPv6:2001:4b98:dc4:8::227]) by smtp1.osuosl.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 9DFDE8250B for ; Fri, 29 Jul 2022 09:42:55 +0000 (UTC) Received: (Authenticated sender: thomas.petazzoni@bootlin.com) by mail.gandi.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 3529720009; Fri, 29 Jul 2022 09:42:52 +0000 (UTC) Date: Fri, 29 Jul 2022 11:42:51 +0200 To: Christian Stewart Message-ID: <20220729114251.217a4104@windsurf> In-Reply-To: References: <20220724234718.676572-1-christian@paral.in> <20220726191133.26dba919@windsurf> Organization: Bootlin X-Mailer: Claws Mail 4.1.0 (GTK 3.24.34; x86_64-redhat-linux-gnu) MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Mailman-Original-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=bootlin.com; s=gm1; t=1659087772; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: content-transfer-encoding:content-transfer-encoding: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=xeixjKxWmnqmfvKTohfxwddc5d1yyHD+2g5CYqQwNHk=; b=niFjdy9vDJvFUF1eNoICq6NSs/dqNp0JBl5CYOJ9f3CMGadhRK//vVz3zS+RvCXoH9jnfb FgZeu8O2QaddRHW0MDnShdzrJWI2S1IGhK83DF5EP1C+eeiEs0jarU4TPfZlbgpKTeYJ4J H9Kpj02sryER8AYVZQ95Ub5yIJMnXHGKheD7VS7wzpuaUjw1KU5iDGu/D/sDzUKGJEhTmA ue9k9GBUoCNSGYZBW/eYco0zljXrv83SK8Ne3PPoaCfKwqLtVPJXqbmwr7387WXjMcaT7O ovml29TpxtrSVCtvgEBzqQyjYlTWM6Qq1yc4tJPgACg/ZrT1ui7tPD2cA5oX4Q== X-Mailman-Original-Authentication-Results: smtp1.osuosl.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key, unprotected) header.d=bootlin.com header.i=@bootlin.com header.a=rsa-sha256 header.s=gm1 header.b=niFjdy9v Subject: Re: [Buildroot] [RFC PATCH v1 1/1] package/android-tools: update to version 5.1.1.r38 X-BeenThere: buildroot@buildroot.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussion and development of buildroot List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , From: Thomas Petazzoni via buildroot Reply-To: Thomas Petazzoni Cc: "Yann E . MORIN" , Christian Stewart via buildroot Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Errors-To: buildroot-bounces@buildroot.org Sender: "buildroot" Hello Christian, On Thu, 28 Jul 2022 08:24:18 -0700 Christian Stewart wrote: > ACK on your comments. > > However, I think even this updated version is still extremely old. > > It doesn't have all of the arguments like --page-size or even --version > > The Gentoo package reports version 31.0.3-android-tools > > That's way way way more recent than 5.x, right? > > I'm a bit confused on these version schemes. > > https://github.com/nmeum/android-tools I have no idea how this is maintained. It's probably a bit crappy as this is forked from the Android code base. So far, we were using the android-tools packaged in Ubuntu, therefore available on Launchpad. This other Github repository you're pointing to perhaps uses a different version scheme. > This package has a Cmake version of building it which seems much > cleaner, and also brings in all the other tools like simg. > > To be able to build it, it requires using the Git submodules method: > > ANDROID_TOOLS_VERSION = 31.0.3p1 > ANDROID_TOOLS_SITE = https://github.com/nmeum/android-tools > ANDROID_TOOLS_SITE_METHOD = git > ANDROID_TOOLS_LICENSE = Apache-2.0 > ANDROID_TOOLS_GIT_SUBMODULES = YES > > And carries its own patches for adb, etc. > > Would it be desirable to switch to this version instead? I certainly > would prefer it for my purposes. This seems like a reasonable solution. I see that a Go compiler is needed. Is it because the android tools developed by Google are now written in Go? Thomas -- Thomas Petazzoni, co-owner and CEO, Bootlin Embedded Linux and Kernel engineering and training https://bootlin.com _______________________________________________ buildroot mailing list buildroot@buildroot.org https://lists.buildroot.org/mailman/listinfo/buildroot