From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from smtp4.osuosl.org (smtp4.osuosl.org [140.211.166.137]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B23A3C00140 for ; Tue, 2 Aug 2022 07:46:27 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by smtp4.osuosl.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 081D6401C1; Tue, 2 Aug 2022 07:46:26 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 smtp4.osuosl.org 081D6401C1 X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at osuosl.org Received: from smtp4.osuosl.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (smtp4.osuosl.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id doyYT4O-TaBZ; Tue, 2 Aug 2022 07:46:25 +0000 (UTC) Received: from ash.osuosl.org (ash.osuosl.org [140.211.166.34]) by smtp4.osuosl.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A631C40193; Tue, 2 Aug 2022 07:46:24 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 smtp4.osuosl.org A631C40193 Received: from smtp2.osuosl.org (smtp2.osuosl.org [140.211.166.133]) by ash.osuosl.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D617D1BF263 for ; Tue, 2 Aug 2022 07:46:22 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by smtp2.osuosl.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B147840497 for ; Tue, 2 Aug 2022 07:46:22 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 smtp2.osuosl.org B147840497 X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at osuosl.org Received: from smtp2.osuosl.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (smtp2.osuosl.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 7VW2Rv41kyd3 for ; Tue, 2 Aug 2022 07:46:21 +0000 (UTC) X-Greylist: from auto-whitelisted by SQLgrey-1.8.0 DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 smtp2.osuosl.org 1144340195 Received: from relay10.mail.gandi.net (relay10.mail.gandi.net [IPv6:2001:4b98:dc4:8::230]) by smtp2.osuosl.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 1144340195 for ; Tue, 2 Aug 2022 07:46:20 +0000 (UTC) Received: (Authenticated sender: thomas.petazzoni@bootlin.com) by mail.gandi.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 99363240006; Tue, 2 Aug 2022 07:46:17 +0000 (UTC) Date: Tue, 2 Aug 2022 09:46:16 +0200 To: Jesse T Message-ID: <20220802094616.2a60881c@windsurf> In-Reply-To: References: <20220730061219.3061864-1-Mr.Bossman075@gmail.com> <20220801225044.63ead8d4@windsurf> Organization: Bootlin X-Mailer: Claws Mail 4.1.0 (GTK 3.24.34; x86_64-redhat-linux-gnu) MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Mailman-Original-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=bootlin.com; s=gm1; t=1659426378; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: content-transfer-encoding:content-transfer-encoding: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=6SeqBVhd1CXUN59knCI57U6cfBS1dJpa2xH0q53yoS8=; b=dzUbg3db4Frrq3Euy+pP6wfxPm+6urtW4uBacnqfXwx7S4TJ3qHKuzowsjoxmqUu8hxDBn k+CnrOfKpvSr6MLKZE0mxXOgYK1rHEV0IlmZG4ETaKaATuuqaopgWhzRjlAJGGGGdeocrz kKM21KIrlQVYhowGhz8WBTlrJugEoKrLaG+wZLtTQs4bXtnv8eLHhdRyf2CTVuexhM3rOp CmVx4bCUqx+JaD8FJhmxX2f1+z+GYOzrBN1wJiNkym77SvirU1SsI/nV2hAqA65WJTQLjH 1Uw/7RQ9GCWC3VfknykW1AD9M0fa1QPhjsJfBwZIW8xtLvJB8BdasW7tfo9axQ== X-Mailman-Original-Authentication-Results: smtp2.osuosl.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key, unprotected) header.d=bootlin.com header.i=@bootlin.com header.a=rsa-sha256 header.s=gm1 header.b=dzUbg3db Subject: Re: [Buildroot] [PATCH v2] configs/imxrt1050-evk: New defconfig X-BeenThere: buildroot@buildroot.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussion and development of buildroot List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , From: Thomas Petazzoni via buildroot Reply-To: Thomas Petazzoni Cc: Fabio Estevam , Giulio Benetti , maeva.manuel@oss.nxp.com, stephane.viau@oss.nxp.com, buildroot@buildroot.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Errors-To: buildroot-bounces@buildroot.org Sender: "buildroot" Hello Jesse, On Mon, 1 Aug 2022 17:46:48 -0400 Jesse T wrote: > > Any reason to add Giulio here? > > We worked on Linux and U-Boot together. Then I think it is worth mentioning in the commit log, as it is surprising to see two people added in the DEVELOPERS file, without any explanation. > > Why is this test needed? The Image file will be produced by the kernel > > build, so it should be there. If it's not, we should really error out > > hard. So I think doing without the test is better. > > I was using board/nexbox/a95x/post-build.sh as a base, I can drop it. Yes, I think this test doesn't make sense, so you can drop it. > > > +# Filesystem > > > +BR2_TARGET_ROOTFS_EXT2=y > > > +BR2_TARGET_ROOTFS_EXT2_4=y > > > +BR2_TARGET_ROOTFS_EXT2_LABEL="root" > > > +BR2_TARGET_ROOTFS_EXT2_SIZE="3M" > > > > Why limit to 3 MB ? Is there a strong reason? > > Because that's the nearest ceil(MB) size of the ext4 filesystem. > I like dd-ing the images fast. You can use bmap-tools to speed up writing a SD card image that is large but mostly empty. > https://patchwork.ozlabs.org/project/uboot/patch/20220712110023.3163770-1-andre.przywara@arm.com/ > > The patch above removes the need for binutils 2.36 and a U-Boot > version hasn't been released with that commit yet. > This is the reason for no U-Boot version. As explained by Giulio, you should use a well-defined version of U-Boot, and backport the U-Boot patch. Thanks a lot! Thomas -- Thomas Petazzoni, co-owner and CEO, Bootlin Embedded Linux and Kernel engineering and training https://bootlin.com _______________________________________________ buildroot mailing list buildroot@buildroot.org https://lists.buildroot.org/mailman/listinfo/buildroot