From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from smtp4.osuosl.org (smtp4.osuosl.org [140.211.166.137]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id EC3D6C32789 for ; Tue, 23 Aug 2022 20:02:01 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by smtp4.osuosl.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8E51D409AA; Tue, 23 Aug 2022 20:02:01 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 smtp4.osuosl.org 8E51D409AA X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at osuosl.org Received: from smtp4.osuosl.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (smtp4.osuosl.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id dpp-zoeyvq3m; Tue, 23 Aug 2022 20:02:00 +0000 (UTC) Received: from ash.osuosl.org (ash.osuosl.org [140.211.166.34]) by smtp4.osuosl.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6DF1E40996; Tue, 23 Aug 2022 20:01:59 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 smtp4.osuosl.org 6DF1E40996 Received: from smtp4.osuosl.org (smtp4.osuosl.org [140.211.166.137]) by ash.osuosl.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E352C1BF39D for ; Tue, 23 Aug 2022 20:01:57 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by smtp4.osuosl.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BBB9B40995 for ; Tue, 23 Aug 2022 20:01:57 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 smtp4.osuosl.org BBB9B40995 X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at osuosl.org Received: from smtp4.osuosl.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (smtp4.osuosl.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id TNHprYqKxCAP for ; Tue, 23 Aug 2022 20:01:56 +0000 (UTC) X-Greylist: from auto-whitelisted by SQLgrey-1.8.0 DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 smtp4.osuosl.org 6384840996 Received: from relay10.mail.gandi.net (relay10.mail.gandi.net [IPv6:2001:4b98:dc4:8::230]) by smtp4.osuosl.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 6384840996 for ; Tue, 23 Aug 2022 20:01:56 +0000 (UTC) Received: (Authenticated sender: thomas.petazzoni@bootlin.com) by mail.gandi.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 7A96D240004; Tue, 23 Aug 2022 20:01:54 +0000 (UTC) Date: Tue, 23 Aug 2022 22:01:53 +0200 To: Romain Naour Message-ID: <20220823220153.3e5c1fb4@windsurf> In-Reply-To: <2a8f7591-1ee7-f0e0-1fb6-43635272c258@gmail.com> References: <20220821153104.239709-1-romain.naour@gmail.com> <20220821153104.239709-2-romain.naour@gmail.com> <20220821230351.69cee603@windsurf> <2a8f7591-1ee7-f0e0-1fb6-43635272c258@gmail.com> Organization: Bootlin X-Mailer: Claws Mail 4.1.0 (GTK 3.24.34; x86_64-redhat-linux-gnu) MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Mailman-Original-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=bootlin.com; s=gm1; t=1661284914; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: content-transfer-encoding:content-transfer-encoding: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=QIAxzbKixymCs+ZH3z5+8U0JIsMqu07d9MPqc8Y0twM=; b=K1QY7PjxevufKt4p4yeMj4tQ96xObCGkdRzBqHo8gnjoGYK7C8URiUBu7GK8YWtkQVNTwb vZZ4jbicUlUM+WXSWDgAnF5Kk/SRIJYssH8r34clLl9tw+B4welJci0PyTlH0xJ6F6P61s 4jsIcTrantBYZy9DZwVy93oplvqZncoFwuqieRCjNM1Z1jrC/Kl969daKHg905AHuH0xyi qS4KKsKMtk3qIcH8VOxF1e2NGKXFsLEwvIpPEKFLJFsAeZSYTO5FSiNFbodr2/KaGXFtk8 Ldh3eW3xGPcF8jG0VgC4yeMXjk80tmjbkVwm+uh6xpjAcbbjZsJDSYsHRN+X/Q== X-Mailman-Original-Authentication-Results: smtp4.osuosl.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key, unprotected) header.d=bootlin.com header.i=@bootlin.com header.a=rsa-sha256 header.s=gm1 header.b=K1QY7Pjx Subject: Re: [Buildroot] [for-next] configs: select uclibc when needed X-BeenThere: buildroot@buildroot.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussion and development of buildroot List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , From: Thomas Petazzoni via buildroot Reply-To: Thomas Petazzoni Cc: buildroot@buildroot.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Errors-To: buildroot-bounces@buildroot.org Sender: "buildroot" On Sun, 21 Aug 2022 23:56:19 +0200 Romain Naour wrote: > I'm agree on the principle to switch them to glibc but boards defconfig where > only runtime tested with uclibc. True, but I don't have much doubt that glibc will work fine if uclibc was working fine. We're anyway already updating the versions of gcc/binutils/uclibc for all defconfigs without necessarily checking again on hardware. > Also we may need to increase the file system > image (BR2_TARGET_ROOTFS_EXT2_SIZE) when needed.That's why I choose to keep > uclibc in this patch. The size issue is not an issue: we will get a hard build failure if we reach the maximum size, so it's easy to detect and fix. So I think I would still prefer the defconfigs to not enforce a C library, and use the default of Buildroot, which is now glibc. Thanks! Thomas -- Thomas Petazzoni, co-owner and CEO, Bootlin Embedded Linux and Kernel engineering and training https://bootlin.com _______________________________________________ buildroot mailing list buildroot@buildroot.org https://lists.buildroot.org/mailman/listinfo/buildroot