Buildroot Archive on lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Thomas Petazzoni via buildroot <buildroot@buildroot.org>
To: Baruch Siach via buildroot <buildroot@buildroot.org>
Cc: Sergey Matyukevich <geomatsi@gmail.com>,
	Julien Olivain <ju.o@free.fr>,
	buildroot@busybox.net, Heiko Thiery <heiko.thiery@gmail.com>,
	Fabio Estevam <festevam@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [Buildroot] [PATCH] boot/arm-trusted-firmware: don't enable SSP by default
Date: Fri, 28 Oct 2022 08:47:02 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20221028084702.3659ace8@windsurf> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <bab58c04544d0247bce855c8b984ce0d5349def4.1666935387.git.baruch@tkos.co.il>

On Fri, 28 Oct 2022 08:36:27 +0300
Baruch Siach via buildroot <buildroot@buildroot.org> wrote:

> SSP support requires support in ATF platform code. Not all platforms
> implement plat_get_stack_protector_canary() hook. The result is build
> failure:
> 
> (.text.asm.update_stack_protector_canary+0x4): undefined reference to `plat_get_stack_protector_canary'
> 
> Commit cf176128ec4 ("boot/arm-trusted-firmware: add SSP option")
> originally introduces this issue. But then commit ccac9a5bbbd
> ("boot/arm-trusted-firmware: don't force ENABLE_STACK_PROTECTOR") hid
> the problem by effectively disabling SSP for all platforms. So only
> after commit 09acc7cbc91f5 ("boot/arm-trusted-firmware: fix SSP
> support") the issue showed up.
> 
> Make SSP an opt-in for platform that actually provide the
> plat_get_stack_protector_canary() hook.
> 
> Cc: Sergey Matyukevich <geomatsi@gmail.com>
> Cc: Dick Olsson <hi@senzilla.io>
> Tested-by: Heiko Thiery <heiko.thiery@gmail.com>
> Signed-off-by: Baruch Siach <baruch@tkos.co.il>
> ---
>  boot/arm-trusted-firmware/Config.in | 1 -
>  1 file changed, 1 deletion(-)

We had a quick discussion with Peter Korsgaard on IRC a few days ago
about this, and I do agree making this opt-in is the right solution, so
I've applied. We'll see if other maintainers disagree :-)

Thanks!

Thomas
-- 
Thomas Petazzoni, CTO, Bootlin
Embedded Linux and Kernel engineering
https://bootlin.com
_______________________________________________
buildroot mailing list
buildroot@buildroot.org
https://lists.buildroot.org/mailman/listinfo/buildroot

  reply	other threads:[~2022-10-28  6:47 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2022-10-28  5:36 [Buildroot] [PATCH] boot/arm-trusted-firmware: don't enable SSP by default Baruch Siach via buildroot
2022-10-28  6:47 ` Thomas Petazzoni via buildroot [this message]
2022-11-02 22:45 ` Peter Korsgaard
2022-11-11 20:18 ` Thomas Petazzoni via buildroot
2022-11-13 18:03   ` Baruch Siach via buildroot

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20221028084702.3659ace8@windsurf \
    --to=buildroot@buildroot.org \
    --cc=buildroot@busybox.net \
    --cc=festevam@gmail.com \
    --cc=geomatsi@gmail.com \
    --cc=heiko.thiery@gmail.com \
    --cc=ju.o@free.fr \
    --cc=thomas.petazzoni@bootlin.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox