From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from smtp3.osuosl.org (smtp3.osuosl.org [140.211.166.136]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B300FC4332F for ; Wed, 2 Nov 2022 17:06:19 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by smtp3.osuosl.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3F86660E63; Wed, 2 Nov 2022 17:06:19 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 smtp3.osuosl.org 3F86660E63 X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at osuosl.org Received: from smtp3.osuosl.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (smtp3.osuosl.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Vd4EgQUfp-AU; Wed, 2 Nov 2022 17:06:18 +0000 (UTC) Received: from ash.osuosl.org (ash.osuosl.org [140.211.166.34]) by smtp3.osuosl.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7AD2260E5B; Wed, 2 Nov 2022 17:06:17 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 smtp3.osuosl.org 7AD2260E5B Received: from smtp4.osuosl.org (smtp4.osuosl.org [140.211.166.137]) by ash.osuosl.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4E2CD1BF294 for ; Wed, 2 Nov 2022 17:06:16 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by smtp4.osuosl.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 11C9E416D0 for ; Wed, 2 Nov 2022 17:06:16 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 smtp4.osuosl.org 11C9E416D0 X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at osuosl.org Received: from smtp4.osuosl.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (smtp4.osuosl.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id LAA7nC5w_gDY for ; Wed, 2 Nov 2022 17:06:13 +0000 (UTC) X-Greylist: domain auto-whitelisted by SQLgrey-1.8.0 DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 smtp4.osuosl.org B9BAA414C2 Received: from relay3-d.mail.gandi.net (relay3-d.mail.gandi.net [217.70.183.195]) by smtp4.osuosl.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B9BAA414C2 for ; Wed, 2 Nov 2022 17:06:12 +0000 (UTC) Received: (Authenticated sender: thomas.petazzoni@bootlin.com) by mail.gandi.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id DD28060014; Wed, 2 Nov 2022 17:06:09 +0000 (UTC) Date: Wed, 2 Nov 2022 18:06:08 +0100 To: Joachim Wiberg Message-ID: <20221102180608.4ac368ae@windsurf> In-Reply-To: <875yfzf8gy.fsf@gmail.com> References: <20221031174632.377586-1-troglobit@gmail.com> <20221031174632.377586-2-troglobit@gmail.com> <20221031214739.6b258cb3@windsurf> <875yfzf8gy.fsf@gmail.com> Organization: Bootlin X-Mailer: Claws Mail 4.1.0 (GTK 3.24.34; x86_64-redhat-linux-gnu) MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Mailman-Original-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=bootlin.com; s=gm1; t=1667408770; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: content-transfer-encoding:content-transfer-encoding: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=dPFbqao72VyNqt+XAkzR0Vr1T40bjk7vD0mLomsrrOo=; b=PTf0jUSx0vNO5UUkL9p9+LnFHHwGvkIrRIeagcU1O/2xjxTDjyqvhVAA8GdXDK/YU/2XWE 5FUvSnk4r+TSQtFhON6n1MNzsxhrYOywcCf6rSR0gmOdlgzxDY1/fJhLNoT76aNdMg2wWT ZWVUVYzzDv/QD4v7Ac1BJb3uV8aKpDXHbOdB2+2N06gw3By+Y1sWgogpcHrUaV27yyV5eS x8Dnx4Pu9PvR2zxFVVxulK6fvhb6mOxsI92xlz63o21h2vCIA1J+lds/R1yKrzJr40eqMJ mVYjUf5v1EX8X7f01ObBONGSN+4p+rGnZO4cc5dDa4h/Yi9x9+TBYI9KNxseMQ== X-Mailman-Original-Authentication-Results: smtp4.osuosl.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key, unprotected) header.d=bootlin.com header.i=@bootlin.com header.a=rsa-sha256 header.s=gm1 header.b=PTf0jUSx Subject: Re: [Buildroot] [PATCH 1/3] package/ssdp-responder: bump to version 1.9 X-BeenThere: buildroot@buildroot.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussion and development of buildroot List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , From: Thomas Petazzoni via buildroot Reply-To: Thomas Petazzoni Cc: buildroot@buildroot.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Errors-To: buildroot-bounces@buildroot.org Sender: "buildroot" On Tue, 01 Nov 2022 08:18:53 +0100 Joachim Wiberg wrote: > I tried to be as clear as possible about this, even when I did the > release upstream. Maybe I should have been extra clear somehow? All we expect is a short note in the commit log, which clarifies that the submitter of the patch has changed the hash of the license file after properly checking what the changes in the license files are. That's really the complete extent of our expectation :-) Thanks a lot! Thomas -- Thomas Petazzoni, co-owner and CEO, Bootlin Embedded Linux and Kernel engineering and training https://bootlin.com _______________________________________________ buildroot mailing list buildroot@buildroot.org https://lists.buildroot.org/mailman/listinfo/buildroot