From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from smtp4.osuosl.org (smtp4.osuosl.org [140.211.166.137]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 5ECE4C352A1 for ; Sat, 3 Dec 2022 18:14:14 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by smtp4.osuosl.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C94074046D; Sat, 3 Dec 2022 18:14:13 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 smtp4.osuosl.org C94074046D X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at osuosl.org Received: from smtp4.osuosl.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (smtp4.osuosl.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id PR3egHL0ZdEu; Sat, 3 Dec 2022 18:14:12 +0000 (UTC) Received: from ash.osuosl.org (ash.osuosl.org [140.211.166.34]) by smtp4.osuosl.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BEA1140363; Sat, 3 Dec 2022 18:14:11 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 smtp4.osuosl.org BEA1140363 Received: from smtp4.osuosl.org (smtp4.osuosl.org [140.211.166.137]) by ash.osuosl.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CB50A1BF232 for ; Sat, 3 Dec 2022 18:14:09 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by smtp4.osuosl.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A522740363 for ; Sat, 3 Dec 2022 18:14:09 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 smtp4.osuosl.org A522740363 X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at osuosl.org Received: from smtp4.osuosl.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (smtp4.osuosl.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Bm7EevxUlbK3 for ; Sat, 3 Dec 2022 18:14:08 +0000 (UTC) X-Greylist: whitelisted by SQLgrey-1.8.0 DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 smtp4.osuosl.org 2F39840351 Received: from smtp1-g21.free.fr (smtp1-g21.free.fr [212.27.42.1]) by smtp4.osuosl.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 2F39840351 for ; Sat, 3 Dec 2022 18:14:08 +0000 (UTC) Received: from ymorin.is-a-geek.org (unknown [IPv6:2a01:cb19:8b51:cb00:c0ba:9ce3:3496:4e04]) (Authenticated sender: yann.morin.1998@free.fr) by smtp1-g21.free.fr (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 31FEAB005FA; Sat, 3 Dec 2022 19:14:02 +0100 (CET) Received: by ymorin.is-a-geek.org (sSMTP sendmail emulation); Sat, 03 Dec 2022 19:14:01 +0100 Date: Sat, 3 Dec 2022 19:14:01 +0100 From: "Yann E. MORIN" To: Thomas Petazzoni Message-ID: <20221203181401.GE3302@scaer> References: <38529777-79a9-dfb5-ec42-b7c37e617281@gmail.com> <20221203155247.428cb5a1@windsurf> <20221203160506.GD3302@scaer> <20221203182323.30a07da3@windsurf> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20221203182323.30a07da3@windsurf> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.22 (2013-10-16) X-Mailman-Original-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=free.fr; s=smtp-20201208; t=1670091245; bh=pfPU5MrAZU7NCYI5sW45OL5j6TfnMyLhnLlg9snwQdo=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:References:In-Reply-To:From; b=qiShTY9i41X0iu8zRNLHdkOp9o9DT5ByZGzlqwir6wrAGqJFO7KqyK2hJLKqKd/b3 abaVrAegLSoXCbm7vypv4QW8r63W45mEp7Fif8PDErklEvj7m/NfpPs4OGRSJsRlXe tKbviM8jnCQOrF1Vyj2fNIgrl7z5u657GA7W/EZmBqRE+Mn1JgMMdxFfziFlU5Y/Jh iR9kGClIzVjMqe2ZJapa1liA9ETHPBjH2PS4/xzX9xZF8KrTNAsKmVp8TU/ogw++Cm l0u9vR+ldoaI027fk9Y2aH4ntrPjbU9Qk0NuRd5PcNFdKPTt1vUZCqBd9wGWqDr+U3 kM1fjsob4gTHw== X-Mailman-Original-Authentication-Results: smtp4.osuosl.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=free.fr header.i=@free.fr header.a=rsa-sha256 header.s=smtp-20201208 header.b=qiShTY9i Subject: Re: [Buildroot] _SOURCE with _SITE_METHOD = git can result to tar.gz with mismatched file extension X-BeenThere: buildroot@buildroot.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussion and development of buildroot List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: Bagas Sanjaya , Buildroot Mailman Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Errors-To: buildroot-bounces@buildroot.org Sender: "buildroot" Thomas, All, On 2022-12-03 18:23 +0100, Thomas Petazzoni spake thusly: > On Sat, 3 Dec 2022 17:05:06 +0100 > "Yann E. MORIN" wrote: > > > Yann, thoughts? (1) seems easier to me, I don't know if the benefits of > > > (2) are really relevant. > > I think the only meaningful solution is to go for (1): detect and abort. > > I too do not think letting packages each request a different compression > > would be interesting... > > If we believe that gzip is too slow/big, then we can think about > > switching to another scheme globaly, but that's orthogonal... > Actually, (2) would have an advantage: it would allow to migrate from > one compression to another package per package, instead of requiring a > flag day where we switch all VCS-fetched packages to the new > compression. Sure, but we already need a flag-day when we actually change the way we generate the archives from VCS checkouts: 5b95a5dc27c0 support/download: change format of archives generated from git c043ecb20ce6 support/download: change format of archives generated from svn c92be85e3a29 support/download: make the svn backend more reproducible Having a flag-day is not too bad, as we can quite easily script the hash updates... So, I still believe we should not allow _SOURCE when _SITE_METHOD is one of our VCS backends. Regards, Yann E. MORIN. -- .-----------------.--------------------.------------------.--------------------. | Yann E. MORIN | Real-Time Embedded | /"\ ASCII RIBBON | Erics' conspiracy: | | +33 662 376 056 | Software Designer | \ / CAMPAIGN | ___ | | +33 561 099 427 `------------.-------: X AGAINST | \e/ There is no | | http://ymorin.is-a-geek.org/ | _/*\_ | / \ HTML MAIL | v conspiracy. | '------------------------------^-------^------------------^--------------------' _______________________________________________ buildroot mailing list buildroot@buildroot.org https://lists.buildroot.org/mailman/listinfo/buildroot