From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from smtp2.osuosl.org (smtp2.osuosl.org [140.211.166.133]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A63E2C352A1 for ; Sat, 3 Dec 2022 17:23:33 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by smtp2.osuosl.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E304540104; Sat, 3 Dec 2022 17:23:32 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 smtp2.osuosl.org E304540104 X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at osuosl.org Received: from smtp2.osuosl.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (smtp2.osuosl.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id uiaYVffjBRDn; Sat, 3 Dec 2022 17:23:32 +0000 (UTC) Received: from ash.osuosl.org (ash.osuosl.org [140.211.166.34]) by smtp2.osuosl.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3D03D400FE; Sat, 3 Dec 2022 17:23:31 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 smtp2.osuosl.org 3D03D400FE Received: from smtp3.osuosl.org (smtp3.osuosl.org [140.211.166.136]) by ash.osuosl.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 913E61BF32E for ; Sat, 3 Dec 2022 17:23:29 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by smtp3.osuosl.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 75C5B605DB for ; Sat, 3 Dec 2022 17:23:29 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 smtp3.osuosl.org 75C5B605DB X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at osuosl.org Received: from smtp3.osuosl.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (smtp3.osuosl.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Q_9nFEugT_1L for ; Sat, 3 Dec 2022 17:23:28 +0000 (UTC) X-Greylist: domain auto-whitelisted by SQLgrey-1.8.0 DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 smtp3.osuosl.org 35FF660596 Received: from relay10.mail.gandi.net (relay10.mail.gandi.net [217.70.178.230]) by smtp3.osuosl.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 35FF660596 for ; Sat, 3 Dec 2022 17:23:28 +0000 (UTC) Received: (Authenticated sender: thomas.petazzoni@bootlin.com) by mail.gandi.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id E7430240004; Sat, 3 Dec 2022 17:23:24 +0000 (UTC) Date: Sat, 3 Dec 2022 18:23:23 +0100 To: "Yann E. MORIN" Message-ID: <20221203182323.30a07da3@windsurf> In-Reply-To: <20221203160506.GD3302@scaer> References: <38529777-79a9-dfb5-ec42-b7c37e617281@gmail.com> <20221203155247.428cb5a1@windsurf> <20221203160506.GD3302@scaer> Organization: Bootlin X-Mailer: Claws Mail 4.1.1 (GTK 3.24.35; x86_64-redhat-linux-gnu) MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Mailman-Original-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=bootlin.com; s=gm1; t=1670088205; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: content-transfer-encoding:content-transfer-encoding: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=UH4ai0bCZRSisiTbsp7MjtbIIFWxb5GPBwmlcCrKdWk=; b=AUfWAuJJR5AAzk5x6jpA9NeAf41qJOjdECqgS5cv+iopjXTvX/LKJBxySO0bEUtetY+Tgy EcHS6QIacuWwUZr290Pu7p1xGhXfR3EyJkAzwtAqSkGBC63BBLlX/cG503x7fzoEfryfVh QmwRKUDCc3Y6LEMdA8E2/CLVSHuEY+WxGn2bspmSI9aQwfLRcz6RWb6IgmUosGEkym6ypZ fCfAhSJ8O+Ujdvlg3VWrIgTgrYCfe3ZeEVejpM8ppmKRwyyjcokiO8nJfUah6o/wJ2EQLX NJi5trWZtGouXc9pjJ+XeRwPYWSi4n33wOCtE5iVCMRzu2/31CdpN7kWM3t32g== X-Mailman-Original-Authentication-Results: smtp3.osuosl.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key, unprotected) header.d=bootlin.com header.i=@bootlin.com header.a=rsa-sha256 header.s=gm1 header.b=AUfWAuJJ Subject: Re: [Buildroot] _SOURCE with _SITE_METHOD = git can result to tar.gz with mismatched file extension X-BeenThere: buildroot@buildroot.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussion and development of buildroot List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , From: Thomas Petazzoni via buildroot Reply-To: Thomas Petazzoni Cc: Bagas Sanjaya , Buildroot Mailman Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Errors-To: buildroot-bounces@buildroot.org Sender: "buildroot" Hello, On Sat, 3 Dec 2022 17:05:06 +0100 "Yann E. MORIN" wrote: > > Yann, thoughts? (1) seems easier to me, I don't know if the benefits of > > (2) are really relevant. > > I think the only meaningful solution is to go for (1): detect and abort. > I too do not think letting packages each request a different compression > would be interesting... > > If we believe that gzip is too slow/big, then we can think about > switching to another scheme globaly, but that's orthogonal... Actually, (2) would have an advantage: it would allow to migrate from one compression to another package per package, instead of requiring a flag day where we switch all VCS-fetched packages to the new compression. Best regards, Thomas -- Thomas Petazzoni, co-owner and CEO, Bootlin Embedded Linux and Kernel engineering and training https://bootlin.com _______________________________________________ buildroot mailing list buildroot@buildroot.org https://lists.buildroot.org/mailman/listinfo/buildroot