From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from smtp2.osuosl.org (smtp2.osuosl.org [140.211.166.133]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E2EB7C4332F for ; Sat, 10 Dec 2022 16:27:53 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by smtp2.osuosl.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 86ADE403BF; Sat, 10 Dec 2022 16:27:53 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 smtp2.osuosl.org 86ADE403BF X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at osuosl.org Received: from smtp2.osuosl.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (smtp2.osuosl.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Hzr8PTRPIA6I; Sat, 10 Dec 2022 16:27:52 +0000 (UTC) Received: from ash.osuosl.org (ash.osuosl.org [140.211.166.34]) by smtp2.osuosl.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D142E403A4; Sat, 10 Dec 2022 16:27:51 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 smtp2.osuosl.org D142E403A4 Received: from smtp1.osuosl.org (smtp1.osuosl.org [140.211.166.138]) by ash.osuosl.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7224E1BF59F for ; Sat, 10 Dec 2022 16:27:50 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by smtp1.osuosl.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4D48581902 for ; Sat, 10 Dec 2022 16:27:50 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 smtp1.osuosl.org 4D48581902 X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at osuosl.org Received: from smtp1.osuosl.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (smtp1.osuosl.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id TK5SWA4XzgyX for ; Sat, 10 Dec 2022 16:27:49 +0000 (UTC) X-Greylist: domain auto-whitelisted by SQLgrey-1.8.0 DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 smtp1.osuosl.org 506A1817B3 Received: from mail.femto-st.fr (lifc.univ-fcomte.fr [194.57.88.66]) by smtp1.osuosl.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 506A1817B3 for ; Sat, 10 Dec 2022 16:27:49 +0000 (UTC) Received: from x230_1.trabucayre.com ([78.252.129.8]) (authenticated bits=0) by mail.femto-st.fr (8.15.2/8.15.2/Debian-8+deb9u1) with ESMTPSA id 2BAGRhDf001617 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT); Sat, 10 Dec 2022 17:27:44 +0100 Date: Sat, 10 Dec 2022 17:28:36 +0100 From: Gwenhael Goavec-Merou To: Bagas Sanjaya Message-ID: <20221210172836.0e872e46@x230_1.trabucayre.com> In-Reply-To: <07221b04-b25b-1f24-6ad2-872c66a086e7@gmail.com> References: <1670597027-3905-1-git-send-email-gwenj@trabucayre.com> <20221209233009.6b003e99@windsurf> <07221b04-b25b-1f24-6ad2-872c66a086e7@gmail.com> X-Mailer: Claws Mail 4.1.0 (GTK 3.24.34; x86_64-pc-linux-gnu) MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.79 on 194.57.88.66 Subject: Re: [Buildroot] Specific toolchain components version support (was Re: [PATCH v2] package/gnuradio: restrict gcc to >= 9.3.0) X-BeenThere: buildroot@buildroot.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussion and development of buildroot List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: Gwenhael Goavec-Merou , "Yann E. MORIN" , Thomas Petazzoni , buildroot@buildroot.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Errors-To: buildroot-bounces@buildroot.org Sender: "buildroot" Hi all, On Sat, 10 Dec 2022 17:02:37 +0700 Bagas Sanjaya wrote: > On 12/10/22 05:30, Thomas Petazzoni via buildroot wrote: > > In any case, we need to patch out, because we can't express a > > dependency on >= 9.3.0 in Buildroot, we can only express a dependency > > on >= 9.x. > > > > If we go down to x.y requirement of toolchain components, we also need > to be able to select specific x.y (minor release) components version > when building the Buildroot toolchain. For example, someone targetting > Raspberry Pi 4 may require GCC 10.2.0, Binutils 2.35.2, and glibc 2.31 > (these are versions used in Debian/Raspberry Pi OS 11). Linux kernel > headers are unaffected, since even custom tarball containing exact > kernel version can be specified. > It's my fault: not a closer look to when std::filesystem was introduce and followed gnuradio's commit instead of checking gcc releases. Sorry for the noise... Gwen > Cc'ing Yann and Arnout to help sorting this out. > > Thanks. > > -- > An old man doll... just what I always wanted! - Clara > _______________________________________________ buildroot mailing list buildroot@buildroot.org https://lists.buildroot.org/mailman/listinfo/buildroot