From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from smtp1.osuosl.org (smtp1.osuosl.org [140.211.166.138]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 1BF1CC4167B for ; Tue, 27 Dec 2022 21:44:55 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by smtp1.osuosl.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BBFBE8139F; Tue, 27 Dec 2022 21:44:54 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 smtp1.osuosl.org BBFBE8139F X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at osuosl.org Received: from smtp1.osuosl.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (smtp1.osuosl.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id vsrJ4ajIWy1N; Tue, 27 Dec 2022 21:44:54 +0000 (UTC) Received: from ash.osuosl.org (ash.osuosl.org [140.211.166.34]) by smtp1.osuosl.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 24E6E8136C; Tue, 27 Dec 2022 21:44:53 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 smtp1.osuosl.org 24E6E8136C Received: from smtp3.osuosl.org (smtp3.osuosl.org [140.211.166.136]) by ash.osuosl.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 24C941BF847 for ; Tue, 27 Dec 2022 21:44:51 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by smtp3.osuosl.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 00EFB60C26 for ; Tue, 27 Dec 2022 21:44:51 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 smtp3.osuosl.org 00EFB60C26 X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at osuosl.org Received: from smtp3.osuosl.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (smtp3.osuosl.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id UpInYnE6mM6j for ; Tue, 27 Dec 2022 21:44:50 +0000 (UTC) X-Greylist: domain auto-whitelisted by SQLgrey-1.8.0 DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 smtp3.osuosl.org F29E060C24 Received: from relay10.mail.gandi.net (relay10.mail.gandi.net [217.70.178.230]) by smtp3.osuosl.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id F29E060C24 for ; Tue, 27 Dec 2022 21:44:49 +0000 (UTC) Received: (Authenticated sender: thomas.petazzoni@bootlin.com) by mail.gandi.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 366F8240004; Tue, 27 Dec 2022 21:44:48 +0000 (UTC) Date: Tue, 27 Dec 2022 22:44:47 +0100 To: Fabrice Fontaine Message-ID: <20221227224447.67dea6f0@windsurf> In-Reply-To: References: <20221222165117.62002-1-fontaine.fabrice@gmail.com> <20221227223514.503ad1c2@windsurf> Organization: Bootlin X-Mailer: Claws Mail 4.1.1 (GTK 3.24.35; x86_64-redhat-linux-gnu) MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Mailman-Original-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=bootlin.com; s=gm1; t=1672177488; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: content-transfer-encoding:content-transfer-encoding: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=3r8iy+79TlRpIgWmHbYeVg4/v2/HS4PWBkkTCHzK5eA=; b=eWLtM7AHaVQD1yHCPf6jUkxDqlB6ffvM3clGcc1y3ct/5m8JUAehhjNgVyNi2+TWupY1op hybhGKC71JeRysLKiWdei3ggwv2EqP/e7QKMKiMWbajQcXpv+XBxtV47fDk6S7VMtbHrny WWOqeynwXN9odTsjrJya/kR4ajMSM4t2XHM5K3XEklhE5MqVd0Kp/3ZnKizPRfQMVI1DHK yq3vHmppSsZl8+0YgylVUVhJT9cJwqJqGDAdDVGlbcYxR8oHO62RaWw12Qni+wsMWhRnav YsOFk0bo03EeKV5691EfZRlYPiV2gXN+0DVXfYUFpM/FIZAIJ0Y68FDRHzqlIA== X-Mailman-Original-Authentication-Results: smtp3.osuosl.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key, unprotected) header.d=bootlin.com header.i=@bootlin.com header.a=rsa-sha256 header.s=gm1 header.b=eWLtM7AH Subject: Re: [Buildroot] [PATCH 1/1] package/tiff: add libdeflate optional dependency X-BeenThere: buildroot@buildroot.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussion and development of buildroot List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , From: Thomas Petazzoni via buildroot Reply-To: Thomas Petazzoni Cc: buildroot@buildroot.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Errors-To: buildroot-bounces@buildroot.org Sender: "buildroot" On Tue, 27 Dec 2022 22:40:52 +0100 Fabrice Fontaine wrote: > > I see it's a policy that has not been really applied to the tiff > > package, but I'm wondering if there's a particular reason to not apply > > our normal policy to this new option? > > I decided to enable it by default for backward compatibility and because > (for an unknown reason) most tiff options are enabled by default but I can > send a v2 if needed. Could you expand a bit on the backward compatibility reason? Is that feature today enabled by default? Best regards, Thomas -- Thomas Petazzoni, co-owner and CEO, Bootlin Embedded Linux and Kernel engineering and training https://bootlin.com _______________________________________________ buildroot mailing list buildroot@buildroot.org https://lists.buildroot.org/mailman/listinfo/buildroot