From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from smtp2.osuosl.org (smtp2.osuosl.org [140.211.166.133]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 8A18BC6FD1D for ; Tue, 14 Mar 2023 22:33:47 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by smtp2.osuosl.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 14BA840B65; Tue, 14 Mar 2023 22:33:47 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 smtp2.osuosl.org 14BA840B65 X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at osuosl.org Received: from smtp2.osuosl.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (smtp2.osuosl.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id kMjqqisME3WC; Tue, 14 Mar 2023 22:33:46 +0000 (UTC) Received: from ash.osuosl.org (ash.osuosl.org [140.211.166.34]) by smtp2.osuosl.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2D41A40B62; Tue, 14 Mar 2023 22:33:45 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 smtp2.osuosl.org 2D41A40B62 Received: from smtp2.osuosl.org (smtp2.osuosl.org [140.211.166.133]) by ash.osuosl.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D5ECF1BF3A4 for ; Tue, 14 Mar 2023 22:33:43 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by smtp2.osuosl.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BAA1B40B62 for ; Tue, 14 Mar 2023 22:33:43 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 smtp2.osuosl.org BAA1B40B62 X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at osuosl.org Received: from smtp2.osuosl.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (smtp2.osuosl.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 17rrZHcecs7h for ; Tue, 14 Mar 2023 22:33:41 +0000 (UTC) X-Greylist: from auto-whitelisted by SQLgrey-1.8.0 DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 smtp2.osuosl.org 353BB40B61 Received: from relay5-d.mail.gandi.net (relay5-d.mail.gandi.net [IPv6:2001:4b98:dc4:8::225]) by smtp2.osuosl.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 353BB40B61 for ; Tue, 14 Mar 2023 22:33:40 +0000 (UTC) Received: (Authenticated sender: thomas.petazzoni@bootlin.com) by mail.gandi.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id ACA581C0002; Tue, 14 Mar 2023 22:33:37 +0000 (UTC) Date: Tue, 14 Mar 2023 23:33:36 +0100 To: Roman Passler Message-ID: <20230314233336.648cfa0f@windsurf> In-Reply-To: <20230314121332.250268-1-roman.passler@gmail.com> References: <20230313183235.2665-1-roman.passler@gmail.com> <20230314121332.250268-1-roman.passler@gmail.com> Organization: Bootlin X-Mailer: Claws Mail 4.1.1 (GTK 3.24.35; x86_64-redhat-linux-gnu) MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Mailman-Original-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=bootlin.com; s=gm1; t=1678833218; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: content-transfer-encoding:content-transfer-encoding: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=LfADl2ZEoXxFH00gCBnsUJjgDnzaJKP9D23wUoOD8C0=; b=WUBTzouerEavF2y+KJ402LgVgcC8d8qxhcg+JDemMSGsz/Lumg6nY3IkrK4V8CkyDeL8QX DTTcFWidxohh2NKmRc5iXIXG9X+jfDx/0d4UWdgwmWJaJJEl9r9hONHDtSVqQ+LYFr1D4a KaMI7h6YtehaOd8tSmWLwGP/GFf7jmiJcGJk/JRg/UBTlHhHqreSoqSCbsR9xoR3RSZU78 7ji4QgT6gUhHAhrHo+DKSV22CNWhlmHaodEd/bmlK8isa8GeJVzgrlcZacga/1nQZ1Juxr x5T6oly51wkLjiiWeKvjwuabUSZCJwbpjEg4a29YLywmQEM3ajYDCOgleiD5kg== X-Mailman-Original-Authentication-Results: smtp2.osuosl.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key, unprotected) header.d=bootlin.com header.i=@bootlin.com header.a=rsa-sha256 header.s=gm1 header.b=WUBTzoue Subject: Re: [Buildroot] [PATCH v2 1/1] package/openocd: bump to 0.12.0 X-BeenThere: buildroot@buildroot.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussion and development of buildroot List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , From: Thomas Petazzoni via buildroot Reply-To: Thomas Petazzoni Cc: "Yann E. MORIN" , buildroot@buildroot.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Errors-To: buildroot-bounces@buildroot.org Sender: "buildroot" Hello Roman, Thanks for this new iteration. I still have some concern about the licensing, so I've added other maintainers in Cc. On Tue, 14 Mar 2023 13:13:32 +0100 Roman Passler wrote: > diff --git a/package/openocd/openocd.hash b/package/openocd/openocd.hash > index 91eb56d930..7f828172f1 100644 > --- a/package/openocd/openocd.hash > +++ b/package/openocd/openocd.hash > @@ -1,3 +1,15 @@ > -# From http://sourceforge.net/projects/openocd/files/openocd/0.11.0/ > -sha256 43a3ce734aff1d3706ad87793a9f3a5371cb0e357f0ffd0a151656b06b3d1e7d openocd-0.11.0.tar.bz2 > -sha256 8177f97513213526df2cf6184d8ff986c675afb514d4e68a404010521b880643 COPYING > +# From http://sourceforge.net/projects/openocd/files/openocd/0.12.0/ > +sha256 af254788be98861f2bd9103fe6e60a774ec96a8c374744eef9197f6043075afa openocd-0.12.0.tar.bz2 > +sha256 1b8f7e37ee5afbbf95c2a4d62b12b25232e29538692663b434318503a9a88419 COPYING > +sha256 0a37155eb8bc0cb94477a0cae4f030e39da9317374e8a9f597e9229fd09aff78 LICENSES/license-rules.txt > +sha256 034da732b4f3079b8783fff756613c1cff89dec5ac80c5cdd90532b7539922a1 LICENSES/exceptions/eCos-exception-2.0 > +sha256 f3ba76203a7b6993db31f987559cc4c621ae1ff78119ced2a669756c2c5fd3b1 LICENSES/preferred/BSD-1-Clause > +sha256 6313108c23efffa36948f8b2cff1560a5935373b527b0e1a837cc77e6ed1bacd LICENSES/preferred/BSD-2-Clause > +sha256 1483f15e9fddc73b5df0acab1c42d21ecd0bf6ade8a79179fb90c09f13d03dcd LICENSES/preferred/BSD-2-Clause-Views > +sha256 7a83b1aeb460458db9a4bd521d7f237c45b1650f6e60ea5ffc71e49472454de3 LICENSES/preferred/BSD-3-Clause > +sha256 5cf024f6e3611d5c6fb98748d1a0ad99b8cf9ffe46f2d60fa10c299cd29e0a75 LICENSES/preferred/BSD-Source-Code > +sha256 f35396f4095619f986736ca5e2976b313d381463a35c921c9ae677cc7eb83e28 LICENSES/preferred/GFDL-1.2 > +sha256 76515be2d7334a1a038f775238c9a4c2b37e19514248e5eea0434cdfee526f9d LICENSES/preferred/gfdl-1.2.texi.readme > +sha256 7d35bc44da7bb763022e3c2c32cfc0125dd222060bc50992420599d8e65f6c0a LICENSES/preferred/GPL-2.0 > +sha256 323c587d0ccf10e376f8bf9a7f31fb4ca6078105194b42e0b1e0ee2bc9bde71f LICENSES/preferred/MIT > +sha256 9a41b56594cd89743ca72f188318c9871661847074dd16497ae0c695fe3ab9c9 LICENSES/stand-alone/GPL-3.0 > diff --git a/package/openocd/openocd.mk b/package/openocd/openocd.mk > index 37a06ca848..95a7fd3c2a 100644 > --- a/package/openocd/openocd.mk > +++ b/package/openocd/openocd.mk > @@ -4,7 +4,7 @@ > # > ################################################################################ > > -OPENOCD_VERSION = 0.11.0 > +OPENOCD_VERSION = 0.12.0 > OPENOCD_SOURCE = openocd-$(OPENOCD_VERSION).tar.bz2 > OPENOCD_SITE = http://sourceforge.net/projects/openocd/files/openocd/$(OPENOCD_VERSION) > OPENOCD_LICENSE = GPL-2.0+ Roman: one thing that isn't good is that you are not adding the new license files in the OPENOCD_LICENSE_FILES variable, it makes the new hashes quite useless. Arnout, Peter, Yann: the COPYING file states that overall the OpenOCD license is GPL-2.0+. The doc is GFDL. There are 3 files in contrib/ (apparently not installed in the Buildroot context) which are under GPL-3.0+. So, do we list all license files in _LICENSE_FILES ? Even if in fact we don't install anything that's under GFDL or GPL-3.0+ ? I'm particularly concerned by the GPL-3.0+ of course, which is seen by some companies as a red flag (for good or bad reasons, that's not the point here). If our installation of OpenOCD does not include GPL-3.0+ code, I think we should not mention that GPL-3.0+ code is distributed. Your opinion? Best regards, Thomas -- Thomas Petazzoni, co-owner and CEO, Bootlin Embedded Linux and Kernel engineering and training https://bootlin.com _______________________________________________ buildroot mailing list buildroot@buildroot.org https://lists.buildroot.org/mailman/listinfo/buildroot