From: Thomas Petazzoni via buildroot <buildroot@buildroot.org>
To: Raphael Pavlidis <raphael.pavlidis@gmail.com>
Cc: Fabrice Fontaine <fontaine.fabrice@gmail.com>, buildroot@buildroot.org
Subject: Re: [Buildroot] [PATCH 1/1] package/shadow: fix libsemanage dependency
Date: Sat, 18 Mar 2023 21:55:36 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20230318215536.02b74732@windsurf> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <e258bff9-5090-414d-bbba-72d15c12d4c5@gmail.com>
Hello Raphael,
On Sat, 18 Mar 2023 18:52:27 +0100 (GMT+01:00)
Raphael Pavlidis <raphael.pavlidis@gmail.com> wrote:
> Besides that, should I not get an email if a build fails in a
> package, whom I am the developer in DEVELOPERS file?
In general, yes. Except here the failure (see
http://autobuild.buildroot.org/results/e528e07874815d7f1cb951084ec985d76fe22d2e/build-end.log)
looks like this:
make: Entering directory '/tmp/instance-11/buildroot'
Makefile:576: *** libsemanage is in the dependency chain of shadow that has added it to its _DEPENDENCIES variable without selecting it or depending on it from Config.in. Stop.
make: Leaving directory '/tmp/instance-11/buildroot'
and the autobuild script does not have logic to interpret that as
"shadow has an issue", so this build failure is classified as having an
"unknown" failure reason.
The autobuild script is able to detect the failing package when the end
of the error log looks like this:
make[1]: Leaving directory '/home/thomas/autobuild/instance-1/output-1/build/bluez5_utils-5.66'
make: *** [package/pkg-generic.mk:293: /home/thomas/autobuild/instance-1/output-1/build/bluez5_utils-5.66/.stamp_built] Error 2
make: Leaving directory '/home/thomas/autobuild/instance-1/buildroot'
Of course, this logic could be improved to also understand the "XYZ is
in the dependency chain of ABC...". If you're curious, the logic is at
https://gitlab.com/buildroot.org/buildroot-test/-/blob/master/web/import.inc.php#L244.
WARNING: ugly PHP code behind this link, make sure to wear appropriate
eye protection equipment before clicking the link and reading the code.
Best regards,
Thomas
--
Thomas Petazzoni, co-owner and CEO, Bootlin
Embedded Linux and Kernel engineering and training
https://bootlin.com
_______________________________________________
buildroot mailing list
buildroot@buildroot.org
https://lists.buildroot.org/mailman/listinfo/buildroot
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2023-03-18 20:55 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-03-18 12:30 [Buildroot] [PATCH 1/1] package/shadow: fix libsemanage dependency Fabrice Fontaine
2023-03-18 17:52 ` Raphael Pavlidis
2023-03-18 20:55 ` Thomas Petazzoni via buildroot [this message]
2023-03-18 21:21 ` Thomas Petazzoni via buildroot
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20230318215536.02b74732@windsurf \
--to=buildroot@buildroot.org \
--cc=fontaine.fabrice@gmail.com \
--cc=raphael.pavlidis@gmail.com \
--cc=thomas.petazzoni@bootlin.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox