From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from smtp4.osuosl.org (smtp4.osuosl.org [140.211.166.137]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 96762C74A5B for ; Wed, 29 Mar 2023 09:29:05 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by smtp4.osuosl.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2FCF841D68; Wed, 29 Mar 2023 09:29:05 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 smtp4.osuosl.org 2FCF841D68 X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at osuosl.org Received: from smtp4.osuosl.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (smtp4.osuosl.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id AV3WVhFxWq6B; Wed, 29 Mar 2023 09:29:04 +0000 (UTC) Received: from ash.osuosl.org (ash.osuosl.org [140.211.166.34]) by smtp4.osuosl.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5239B41C49; Wed, 29 Mar 2023 09:29:03 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 smtp4.osuosl.org 5239B41C49 Received: from smtp4.osuosl.org (smtp4.osuosl.org [140.211.166.137]) by ash.osuosl.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0A9B11BF35D for ; Wed, 29 Mar 2023 09:29:02 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by smtp4.osuosl.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C01C841BBD for ; Wed, 29 Mar 2023 09:29:01 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 smtp4.osuosl.org C01C841BBD X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at osuosl.org Received: from smtp4.osuosl.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (smtp4.osuosl.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id XvFcL3NvwXnX for ; Wed, 29 Mar 2023 09:29:00 +0000 (UTC) X-Greylist: domain auto-whitelisted by SQLgrey-1.8.0 DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 smtp4.osuosl.org 6206E41C49 Received: from relay5-d.mail.gandi.net (relay5-d.mail.gandi.net [217.70.183.197]) by smtp4.osuosl.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 6206E41C49 for ; Wed, 29 Mar 2023 09:29:00 +0000 (UTC) Received: (Authenticated sender: thomas.petazzoni@bootlin.com) by mail.gandi.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 32AB51C0005; Wed, 29 Mar 2023 09:28:56 +0000 (UTC) Date: Wed, 29 Mar 2023 11:28:55 +0200 To: Arnout Vandecappelle Message-ID: <20230329112855.6110cf8d@windsurf> In-Reply-To: References: <20230326130937.56650-1-f.fainelli@gmail.com> <20230328202533.GD3204460@scaer> <20230329105022.6137bf1a@windsurf> Organization: Bootlin X-Mailer: Claws Mail 4.1.1 (GTK 3.24.35; x86_64-redhat-linux-gnu) MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Mailman-Original-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=bootlin.com; s=gm1; t=1680082137; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: content-transfer-encoding:content-transfer-encoding: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=ssE8fNNuWESTSQzw9tYtYImbvZrVtrOfGI5SbIpi+mQ=; b=b/AOd0T5tMBApQ276Kmi2Wm/RXbkZaR7pQMQ9ChAomcyc9cdJxg3bMwBY/cpnGUk3SUXZ9 OUrhAcA9+7ILUC6nMjojTZy6idPcEJyhJudRIFc5rk7x7a40Fo6diAIyaX6fFc456C4Ib0 BXWKYcdZB5vLtMlbRW3XSREWeWEb9ZWC2ofAyJtAguXbMq3NE0ABqPTi2MAL+ReyyP7dMC sRDwSvps3VUf8rwcfBVRD7r+peRu3/ylaRv+NufJYqnpyWzXllVx7UdQKM2YclCn4+ooNi FnaQ+7HjMkMfhpCw5A7p9Yr3NW5Zd1o/WThG+pJr3bwRXYrNu0sWtML7kd3SCg== X-Mailman-Original-Authentication-Results: smtp4.osuosl.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key, unprotected) header.d=bootlin.com header.i=@bootlin.com header.a=rsa-sha256 header.s=gm1 header.b=b/AOd0T5 Subject: Re: [Buildroot] Indicating upstream status [was: [PATCH] package/bluez5_utils: Fix builds with musl-libc] X-BeenThere: buildroot@buildroot.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussion and development of buildroot List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , From: Thomas Petazzoni via buildroot Reply-To: Thomas Petazzoni Cc: Florian Fainelli , marcin@bis.org.pl, d.lang@abatec.at, buildroot@buildroot.org, "Yann E. MORIN" Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Errors-To: buildroot-bounces@buildroot.org Sender: "buildroot" On Wed, 29 Mar 2023 11:06:47 +0200 Arnout Vandecappelle wrote: > Yeah, that's why I propose "Upstream:" - it's generic enough to cover all of > these cases. The contents can be freeform I think, check-package should just > check that the Upstream tag is present. And the documentation should give > examples of the five cases you mention. Sure. > The "patch taken from downstream" is the only one which doesn't fit in the > "Upstream" thing. But it's also a situation we don't really like: we basically > don't want local patches, and a patch taken from some other distro _is_ a local > patch. The reality is that we have such patches (for example to fix musl build issues), and we somehow have to live with them. Thomas -- Thomas Petazzoni, co-owner and CEO, Bootlin Embedded Linux and Kernel engineering and training https://bootlin.com _______________________________________________ buildroot mailing list buildroot@buildroot.org https://lists.buildroot.org/mailman/listinfo/buildroot