From: "Yann E. MORIN" <yann.morin.1998@free.fr>
To: Ben Wolsieffer <ben.wolsieffer@hefring.com>
Cc: Vladimir Murzin <vladimir.murzin@arm.com>,
Thomas Petazzoni <thomas.petazzoni@bootlin.com>,
buildroot@buildroot.org, Romain Naour <romain.naour@gmail.com>,
Giulio Benetti <giulio.benetti@benettiengineering.com>,
Thomas De Schampheleire <thomas.de_schampheleire@nokia.com>
Subject: Re: [Buildroot] [PATCH v3 4/8] arch/arm: add support for FDPIC
Date: Sun, 16 Apr 2023 18:22:00 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20230416162200.GC2819@scaer> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20220819151734.926106-5-Ben.Wolsieffer@hefring.com>
Ben, All,
Sorry for the overly long delay, but as you can imagine, it is not
something that is trivial to review. Even so, here's an long overdue
review...
On 2022-08-19 11:17 -0400, Ben Wolsieffer spake thusly:
> Linux on ARM supports FDPIC binaries intended for use on no-MMU systems.
> This patch enables support for building a toolchain that produces FDPIC
> binaries.
>
> The target name for an FDPIC toolchain must be
> arm-<vendor>-uclinuxfdpiceabi, which doesn't follow the standard format
> and requires a special case.
>
> According to the kernel help for CONFIG_BINFMT_ELF_FDPIC, "It is also
> possible to run FDPIC ELF binaries on MMU linux," so FDPIC support is
> available on all ARM platforms, not just no-MMU.
>
> Signed-off-by: Ben Wolsieffer <Ben.Wolsieffer@hefring.com>
> ---
> arch/Config.in | 1 +
> package/Makefile.in | 6 ++++++
> 2 files changed, 7 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/arch/Config.in b/arch/Config.in
> index 4cd58041a4..c639738f5f 100644
> --- a/arch/Config.in
> +++ b/arch/Config.in
> @@ -39,6 +39,7 @@ config BR2_arceb
>
> config BR2_arm
> bool "ARM (little endian)"
> + select BR2_ARCH_HAS_FDPIC_SUPPORT
> # MMU support is set by the subarchitecture file, arch/Config.in.arm
> help
> ARM is a 32-bit reduced instruction set computer (RISC)
> diff --git a/package/Makefile.in b/package/Makefile.in
> index ff60f85092..81a7028275 100644
> --- a/package/Makefile.in
> +++ b/package/Makefile.in
> @@ -37,7 +37,13 @@ $(error BR2_TOOLCHAIN_BUILDROOT_VENDOR cannot be 'unknown'. \
> endif
>
> # Compute GNU_TARGET_NAME
> +# FDPIC on ARM requires a special target name: it has no OS field and must
> +# use the suffix -uclinuxfdpiceabi.
> +ifeq ($(BR2_arm)$(BR2_armeb):$(BR2_BINFMT_FDPIC),y:y)
> +GNU_TARGET_NAME = $(ARCH)-$(TARGET_VENDOR)-uclinuxfdpiceabi
This looks weird: it looks like they coalesced OS and ABI, and dropped
the LIBC part...
> +else
> GNU_TARGET_NAME = $(ARCH)-$(TARGET_VENDOR)-$(TARGET_OS)-$(LIBC)$(ABI)
> +endif
I am not too fond of this special casing. What about something along the
lines of (existing comments stripped):
TARGET_NAME = $(ARCH)-$(TARGET_VENDOR)-$(TARGET_OS)$(LIBC)$(ABI)))
# Note no dash between OS and LIBC --------------^^
ifeq ($(BR2_arm)$(BR2_armeb)$(BR2_BINFMT_FDPIC),yy)
# For ARM FDPIC, there is no separation between OS and ABI
TARGET_OS = uclinux
else ifeq ($(BR2_BINFMT_FLAT):$(BR2_RISCV_64),y:)
TARGET_OS = uclinux-
else
TARGET_OS = linux-
endif
ifeq ($(BR2_TOOLCHAIN_USES_UCLIBC),y)
# For ARM FDPIC, there's no LIBC part
ifneq ($(BR2_arm)$(BR2_armeb)$(BR2_BINFMT_FDPIC),yy)
LIBC = uclibc
endif
else ifeq ($(BR2_TOOLCHAIN_USES_MUSL),y)
LIBC = musl
else ifeq ($(BR2_TOOLCHAIN_USES_GLIBC),y)
LIBC = gnu
else ifeq ($(BR_BUILDING),y)
$(error No C library enabled, this is not possible.)
endif
ifeq ($(BR2_arm)$(BR2_armeb),y)
ifeq ($(LIBC),uclibc)
ABI = $(if $(BR2_BINFMT_FDPIC),fdpic,gnu)eabi
else
ABI = eabi
endif
ifeq ($(BR2_ARM_EABIHF),y)
# FDPIC is always HF, so don't append the hf suffix (FIXME!)
ABI := $(ABI)$(if $(BR2_BINFMT_FDPIC),,hf)
endif
endif
Note that this is not perfect, as there are a few assumptions hard-coded
in there, but I'm afraid we can't do much much better...
Note that I have no idea about the HF part, so I wrote something for
illustration purposes only...
Regards,
Yann E. MORIN.
> # FLAT binary format needs uclinux, except RISC-V 64-bits which needs
> # the regular linux name.
> --
> 2.37.0
>
> _______________________________________________
> buildroot mailing list
> buildroot@buildroot.org
> https://lists.buildroot.org/mailman/listinfo/buildroot
--
.-----------------.--------------------.------------------.--------------------.
| Yann E. MORIN | Real-Time Embedded | /"\ ASCII RIBBON | Erics' conspiracy: |
| +33 662 376 056 | Software Designer | \ / CAMPAIGN | ___ |
| +33 561 099 427 `------------.-------: X AGAINST | \e/ There is no |
| http://ymorin.is-a-geek.org/ | _/*\_ | / \ HTML MAIL | v conspiracy. |
'------------------------------^-------^------------------^--------------------'
_______________________________________________
buildroot mailing list
buildroot@buildroot.org
https://lists.buildroot.org/mailman/listinfo/buildroot
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2023-04-16 16:22 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 17+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2022-08-19 15:17 [Buildroot] [PATCH v3 0/8] Add support for FDPIC binaries on ARM Ben Wolsieffer
2022-08-19 15:17 ` [Buildroot] [PATCH v3 1/8] Revert "arch: drop now useless support for FDPIC" Ben Wolsieffer
2022-08-19 15:17 ` [Buildroot] [PATCH v3 2/8] arch: don't enable FDPIC binaries by default Ben Wolsieffer
2022-08-19 15:17 ` [Buildroot] [PATCH v3 3/8] arch: make FDPIC dependent on toolchain support Ben Wolsieffer
2022-08-19 15:17 ` [Buildroot] [PATCH v3 4/8] arch/arm: add support for FDPIC Ben Wolsieffer
2023-04-16 16:22 ` Yann E. MORIN [this message]
2022-08-19 15:17 ` [Buildroot] [PATCH v3 5/8] boot/uboot: pass -mno-fdpic if FDPIC is enabled Ben Wolsieffer
2023-09-30 20:36 ` Thomas Petazzoni via buildroot
2022-08-19 15:17 ` [Buildroot] [PATCH v3 6/8] linux: " Ben Wolsieffer
2022-08-19 15:17 ` [Buildroot] [PATCH v3 7/8] package/uclibc: enable NPTL on no-MMU ARM w/ FDPIC Ben Wolsieffer
2022-08-19 15:17 ` [Buildroot] [PATCH v3 8/8] package/pkg-autotools: patch libtool to support ARM FDPIC Ben Wolsieffer
2023-04-16 19:01 ` Yann E. MORIN
2022-08-22 9:52 ` [Buildroot] [PATCH v3 0/8] Add support for FDPIC binaries on ARM Waldemar Brodkorb
2022-08-26 3:22 ` Ben Wolsieffer
2022-09-22 13:18 ` Waldemar Brodkorb
2023-09-30 20:12 ` Thomas Petazzoni via buildroot
2023-10-02 14:18 ` Ben Wolsieffer
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20230416162200.GC2819@scaer \
--to=yann.morin.1998@free.fr \
--cc=ben.wolsieffer@hefring.com \
--cc=buildroot@buildroot.org \
--cc=giulio.benetti@benettiengineering.com \
--cc=romain.naour@gmail.com \
--cc=thomas.de_schampheleire@nokia.com \
--cc=thomas.petazzoni@bootlin.com \
--cc=vladimir.murzin@arm.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox