From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from smtp4.osuosl.org (smtp4.osuosl.org [140.211.166.137]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id DAE05C77B73 for ; Mon, 1 May 2023 19:50:20 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by smtp4.osuosl.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 59086410D4; Mon, 1 May 2023 19:50:20 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 smtp4.osuosl.org 59086410D4 X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at osuosl.org Received: from smtp4.osuosl.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (smtp4.osuosl.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id kHz3u-UVSvCH; Mon, 1 May 2023 19:50:19 +0000 (UTC) Received: from ash.osuosl.org (ash.osuosl.org [140.211.166.34]) by smtp4.osuosl.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 40DBB409CF; Mon, 1 May 2023 19:50:18 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 smtp4.osuosl.org 40DBB409CF Received: from smtp3.osuosl.org (smtp3.osuosl.org [140.211.166.136]) by ash.osuosl.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 573421BF4E7 for ; Mon, 1 May 2023 19:50:16 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by smtp3.osuosl.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 375F260A89 for ; Mon, 1 May 2023 19:50:16 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 smtp3.osuosl.org 375F260A89 X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at osuosl.org Received: from smtp3.osuosl.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (smtp3.osuosl.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id MwOi-lZSvORH for ; Mon, 1 May 2023 19:50:15 +0000 (UTC) X-Greylist: whitelisted by SQLgrey-1.8.0 DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 smtp3.osuosl.org 25F8B607B4 Received: from smtp4-g21.free.fr (smtp4-g21.free.fr [212.27.42.4]) by smtp3.osuosl.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 25F8B607B4 for ; Mon, 1 May 2023 19:50:15 +0000 (UTC) Received: from ymorin.is-a-geek.org (unknown [IPv6:2a01:cb19:8b44:b00:8906:ae70:691:1fda]) (Authenticated sender: yann.morin.1998@free.fr) by smtp4-g21.free.fr (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 323CE19F5A7; Mon, 1 May 2023 21:50:08 +0200 (CEST) Received: by ymorin.is-a-geek.org (sSMTP sendmail emulation); Mon, 01 May 2023 21:50:08 +0200 Date: Mon, 1 May 2023 21:50:08 +0200 From: "Yann E. MORIN" To: Ricardo Martincoski Message-ID: <20230501195008.GC2696@scaer> References: <20220731193521.1217825-1-ricardo.martincoski@gmail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20220731193521.1217825-1-ricardo.martincoski@gmail.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.22 (2013-10-16) X-Mailman-Original-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=free.fr; s=smtp-20201208; t=1682970612; bh=5ihVkdjMreyqID4zfZ9juvr1Fg6mIKooyrFjbHzRo+w=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:References:In-Reply-To:From; b=Q2cxiwZpAshEyoATvRK0oo1MCU+xYUgXxDx0yWoGO+IIpuDAvecEmd8aZoy818En+ AiEw0RzeDz/WYkXtKjVpbPmqMAPNxkjG+lbaAVkvfdE+r6/0pmjuWzIrJ2a6tLkfGB 9sYdtTT4kFMYj6FTnvj92Ch0rlzbGaVwmjCjFj9DDNUmX56kTN31JXtnSq9yZPyk8n iEs7/O7jQsU8mSJ4WoHyORpP1ltemFWtiY2fCRud0Gnm/VeIbVuWNoWZWwF4AlNpP2 UY9VwR1VbFZ76TJblXqqkDwy5muVdadNRt8NGAgjnvbIMrLIEsGRuUEuyzEkKEFZkF Dnnlu8wnJXLRQ== X-Mailman-Original-Authentication-Results: smtp3.osuosl.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=free.fr header.i=@free.fr header.a=rsa-sha256 header.s=smtp-20201208 header.b=Q2cxiwZp Subject: Re: [Buildroot] [PATCH v2 00/14] Preventing style regressions using check-package v2 X-BeenThere: buildroot@buildroot.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussion and development of buildroot List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: Romain Naour , buildroot@buildroot.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Errors-To: buildroot-bounces@buildroot.org Sender: "buildroot" Ricardo, All, (I'm not sure which series introduced the ignore list for check-package, so I'm hjijacking this one.) When there is a file listed in .checkpackageignore, and that file is no longer present, that does not trigger an error. This hapens for example when a patch is removed, or when it is renamed. For example 60d8e5257608 (package/lua: bump to version 5.4.5) renamed the three lua 5.4.4 patches, but their entries in the ignore list were not updated. Would it be possible/easy to have check-package verify that all files in the ignore list do exist? Regards, Yann E. MORIN. -- .-----------------.--------------------.------------------.--------------------. | Yann E. MORIN | Real-Time Embedded | /"\ ASCII RIBBON | Erics' conspiracy: | | +33 662 376 056 | Software Designer | \ / CAMPAIGN | ___ | | +33 561 099 427 `------------.-------: X AGAINST | \e/ There is no | | http://ymorin.is-a-geek.org/ | _/*\_ | / \ HTML MAIL | v conspiracy. | '------------------------------^-------^------------------^--------------------' _______________________________________________ buildroot mailing list buildroot@buildroot.org https://lists.buildroot.org/mailman/listinfo/buildroot