From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from smtp3.osuosl.org (smtp3.osuosl.org [140.211.166.136]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 5CCE2EB64DC for ; Sun, 9 Jul 2023 16:47:06 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by smtp3.osuosl.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1653760757; Sun, 9 Jul 2023 16:47:06 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 smtp3.osuosl.org 1653760757 X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at osuosl.org Received: from smtp3.osuosl.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (smtp3.osuosl.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Lind-cAWEYTf; Sun, 9 Jul 2023 16:47:05 +0000 (UTC) Received: from ash.osuosl.org (ash.osuosl.org [140.211.166.34]) by smtp3.osuosl.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 57FF8606F5; Sun, 9 Jul 2023 16:47:04 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 smtp3.osuosl.org 57FF8606F5 Received: from smtp2.osuosl.org (smtp2.osuosl.org [140.211.166.133]) by ash.osuosl.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9DF0B1BF423 for ; Sun, 9 Jul 2023 16:47:02 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by smtp2.osuosl.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 847054011C for ; Sun, 9 Jul 2023 16:47:02 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 smtp2.osuosl.org 847054011C X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at osuosl.org Received: from smtp2.osuosl.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (smtp2.osuosl.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id VgRPPO3C301j for ; Sun, 9 Jul 2023 16:47:01 +0000 (UTC) X-Greylist: domain auto-whitelisted by SQLgrey-1.8.0 DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 smtp2.osuosl.org 612BE40017 Received: from relay9-d.mail.gandi.net (relay9-d.mail.gandi.net [217.70.183.199]) by smtp2.osuosl.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 612BE40017 for ; Sun, 9 Jul 2023 16:47:01 +0000 (UTC) X-GND-Sasl: thomas.petazzoni@bootlin.com X-GND-Sasl: thomas.petazzoni@bootlin.com Received: by mail.gandi.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id CF57CFF804; Sun, 9 Jul 2023 16:46:58 +0000 (UTC) Date: Sun, 9 Jul 2023 18:46:57 +0200 To: Bernd Kuhls Message-ID: <20230709184657.2658124d@windsurf> In-Reply-To: References: <20230709095058.1547133-1-bernd@kuhls.net> <20230709182938.00cef6ca__21548.8254021452$1688920206$gmane$org@windsurf> Organization: Bootlin X-Mailer: Claws Mail 4.1.1 (GTK 3.24.38; x86_64-redhat-linux-gnu) MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Mailman-Original-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=bootlin.com; s=gm1; t=1688921219; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: content-transfer-encoding:content-transfer-encoding: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=zbpYKXEfX5iZLZAHzs8IKLtmjOMreS9p7E19J5H7a9Y=; b=gtHZUJZrG/z9kzdhkxwOBkXqUNWHPKmXRKukyUSmWIjEJw++jaBpOef3xpDraHOKwsfe+O hjhrMybBr8rGq5GwTqeRNw6Rt9sfGqR1GbXrCDWskKShcKROVT0RAo/TTlfsc/pjRLxcxM c4NDccOV6KhodWuOAWa0q3TKuXZ+S40fELDEp0Ta25u3TDAbkksljKN5pADrL1Me0ETDer /hDjVOhazw6xfkqmHhYsow/6kw8mAgB1iYETFwZjQy5tTAjMtVskMbz0fOABtpLKAe4jVt o3IXYqZKeZEbY4rd6WAqJOrfqv+jDC/GKDN1A5L9gQbMlJDS9eR4ttg6puLERA== X-Mailman-Original-Authentication-Results: smtp2.osuosl.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key, unprotected) header.d=bootlin.com header.i=@bootlin.com header.a=rsa-sha256 header.s=gm1 header.b=gtHZUJZr Subject: Re: [Buildroot] [PATCH 1/2] package/fwts: Fix build with BR2_OPTIMIZE_0 X-BeenThere: buildroot@buildroot.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussion and development of buildroot List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , From: Thomas Petazzoni via buildroot Reply-To: Thomas Petazzoni Cc: buildroot@uclibc.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Errors-To: buildroot-bounces@buildroot.org Sender: "buildroot" Hello, On Sun, 09 Jul 2023 18:42:31 +0200 Bernd Kuhls wrote: > yes, back in 2017: https://bugs.launchpad.net/fwts/+bug/1687049 > > That bug report was solved by using -O2. > > Investigating further I found https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi? > id=102502#c4 which, to the best of my limited C knowledge, indicates that > some assert code will not work with -O0 by design. At this point I > stopped my research and disabled -O0 ;) Alright, thanks for the additional details! Thomas -- Thomas Petazzoni, co-owner and CEO, Bootlin Embedded Linux and Kernel engineering and training https://bootlin.com _______________________________________________ buildroot mailing list buildroot@buildroot.org https://lists.buildroot.org/mailman/listinfo/buildroot