From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from smtp2.osuosl.org (smtp2.osuosl.org [140.211.166.133]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 5C622C04A6A for ; Mon, 7 Aug 2023 15:37:25 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by smtp2.osuosl.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 081DF40A1E; Mon, 7 Aug 2023 15:37:25 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 smtp2.osuosl.org 081DF40A1E X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at osuosl.org Received: from smtp2.osuosl.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (smtp2.osuosl.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 3C1y3gchHEYb; Mon, 7 Aug 2023 15:37:24 +0000 (UTC) Received: from ash.osuosl.org (ash.osuosl.org [140.211.166.34]) by smtp2.osuosl.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 59EE44031E; Mon, 7 Aug 2023 15:37:23 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 smtp2.osuosl.org 59EE44031E Received: from smtp4.osuosl.org (smtp4.osuosl.org [140.211.166.137]) by ash.osuosl.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1E3471BF276 for ; Mon, 7 Aug 2023 15:37:22 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by smtp4.osuosl.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 390AB4015B for ; Mon, 7 Aug 2023 15:37:20 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 smtp4.osuosl.org 390AB4015B X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at osuosl.org Received: from smtp4.osuosl.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (smtp4.osuosl.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id aX0nlJP8n7LY for ; Mon, 7 Aug 2023 15:37:18 +0000 (UTC) Received: from relay2-d.mail.gandi.net (relay2-d.mail.gandi.net [IPv6:2001:4b98:dc4:8::222]) by smtp4.osuosl.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 87B564024D for ; Mon, 7 Aug 2023 15:37:18 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 smtp4.osuosl.org 87B564024D Received: by mail.gandi.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id F07E040008; Mon, 7 Aug 2023 15:37:14 +0000 (UTC) Date: Mon, 7 Aug 2023 17:37:14 +0200 To: "Yann E. MORIN" Message-ID: <20230807173714.3972bb24@windsurf> In-Reply-To: <20230804172213.GR421096@scaer> References: <20230804062307.227606-1-bernd@kuhls.net> <20230804143516.4df34cfe@windsurf> <20230804172213.GR421096@scaer> Organization: Bootlin X-Mailer: Claws Mail 4.1.1 (GTK 3.24.38; x86_64-redhat-linux-gnu) MIME-Version: 1.0 X-GND-Sasl: thomas.petazzoni@bootlin.com X-Mailman-Original-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=bootlin.com; s=gm1; t=1691422635; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: content-transfer-encoding:content-transfer-encoding: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=iVTcHHsjeFpniaO3CwW4VhWUIndmBV4csvno1wqj+mM=; b=mkf5OjJ1paAshtT0UKNVlJoZqGbNfWmY3lHqcQiNudAqtrzzTD7SfrtDXM1id6BCaahiYh I0cw00GTaYxU4TBe2EaqMO+27L4itvQ/6U0ky17Xsna+byGwq2n2ouBgLBpInOuEuG9I4+ f+cm1JOYVLhKggyWGMRPy97weyAH4ATSprvZNT3vnFkSDqVR13azhixjWlAhb466hbWkxm sgoCW+aoDZ7OZp7a59aaL8eoR5J+y0NGEKO17Q+jo2WhcFD1mrHbCpm6fg3U5sQKEyGy8A AaZPQhaj7akd34rh3o09d9NloG+Oe6J7fADmiSEGvLG8/jhl94xipadmA5/KFQ== X-Mailman-Original-Authentication-Results: smtp4.osuosl.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key, unprotected) header.d=bootlin.com header.i=@bootlin.com header.a=rsa-sha256 header.s=gm1 header.b=mkf5OjJ1 Subject: Re: [Buildroot] [PATCH 1/1] package/pkg-generic: handle host-php as an extract dependency X-BeenThere: buildroot@buildroot.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussion and development of buildroot List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , From: Thomas Petazzoni via buildroot Reply-To: Thomas Petazzoni Cc: Bernd Kuhls , buildroot@buildroot.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Errors-To: buildroot-bounces@buildroot.org Sender: "buildroot" On Fri, 4 Aug 2023 19:22:13 +0200 "Yann E. MORIN" wrote: > > What do you think? > > I agree that we do not want to introduce it in the generic infra for > now, until we have at least a few packages that need it. Agreed, but to me the issue was not so much that it was made generic here: my concern was that the proposed solution was half generic, half in the composer package. Thomas -- Thomas Petazzoni, co-owner and CEO, Bootlin Embedded Linux and Kernel engineering and training https://bootlin.com _______________________________________________ buildroot mailing list buildroot@buildroot.org https://lists.buildroot.org/mailman/listinfo/buildroot