From: Thomas Petazzoni via buildroot <buildroot@buildroot.org>
To: Roberto Medina <robertoxmed@gmail.com>
Cc: kilian.zinnecker@mail.de, buildroot@buildroot.org
Subject: Re: [Buildroot] [PATCH v2 1/1] configs/roc_rk3399_pc: Bring back and update the configuration for the rockchip rk3399 built by firefly.
Date: Tue, 8 Aug 2023 23:06:09 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20230808230609.0eaa80e8@windsurf> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20230710212151.574040-2-robertoxmed@gmail.com>
Hello Roberto,
Thanks, this looks mostly good, but I have a few comments/questions.
On Mon, 10 Jul 2023 23:21:47 +0200
Roberto Medina <robertoxmed@gmail.com> wrote:
> * Uses a more recent version of TF-A which solves the building issue for
> this board.
> * Bump on U-Boot version that was used for this configuration.
> * Some minor fixes in the post-build.sh script using `shellcheck`.
>
> Signed-off-by: Roberto Medina <robertoxmed@gmail.com>
> Tested-by: Kilian Zinnecker <kilian.zinnecker@mail.de>
> ---
> board/firefly/roc-rk3399-pc/extlinux.conf | 4 +++
> board/firefly/roc-rk3399-pc/genimage.cfg | 22 +++++++++++++
> board/firefly/roc-rk3399-pc/post-build.sh | 5 +++
> board/firefly/roc-rk3399-pc/readme.txt | 40 +++++++++++++++++++++++
> configs/roc_pc_rk3399_defconfig | 38 +++++++++++++++++++++
> 5 files changed, 109 insertions(+)
Could you add an entry in the DEVELOPERS file referencing you as the
developer/maintainer for configs/roc_pc_rk3399_defconfig and
board/firefly/roc-rk3399-pc/ ?
> diff --git a/configs/roc_pc_rk3399_defconfig b/configs/roc_pc_rk3399_defconfig
> new file mode 100644
> index 0000000000..91574f1d61
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/configs/roc_pc_rk3399_defconfig
> @@ -0,0 +1,38 @@
> +BR2_aarch64=y
> +BR2_cortex_a72_a53=y
> +BR2_BINUTILS_VERSION_2_40_X=y
Why are you forcing binutils 2.40 here? Any reason? This is why I
didn't apply, because I don't understand if there's a solid reason for
you to do that.
> +BR2_TARGET_GENERIC_HOSTNAME="roc-rk3399-pc"
> +BR2_TARGET_GENERIC_ISSUE="Welcome to ROC-RK3399-PC!"
> +BR2_ROOTFS_POST_BUILD_SCRIPT="board/firefly/roc-rk3399-pc/post-build.sh"
> +BR2_ROOTFS_POST_IMAGE_SCRIPT="support/scripts/genimage.sh"
> +BR2_ROOTFS_POST_SCRIPT_ARGS="-c board/firefly/roc-rk3399-pc/genimage.cfg"
> +BR2_LINUX_KERNEL=y
You need to set a fixed version of the Linux kernel.
> +BR2_LINUX_KERNEL_USE_ARCH_DEFAULT_CONFIG=y
> +BR2_LINUX_KERNEL_DTS_SUPPORT=y
> +BR2_LINUX_KERNEL_INTREE_DTS_NAME="rockchip/rk3399-roc-pc"
> +BR2_LINUX_KERNEL_INSTALL_TARGET=y
> +BR2_LINUX_KERNEL_NEEDS_HOST_OPENSSL=y
> +BR2_TARGET_ROOTFS_EXT2=y
> +BR2_TARGET_ROOTFS_EXT2_4=y
> +BR2_TARGET_ROOTFS_EXT2_SIZE="240M"
Why this custom size rather than leaving the default?
> +BR2_TARGET_ARM_TRUSTED_FIRMWARE=y
> +BR2_TARGET_ARM_TRUSTED_FIRMWARE_CUSTOM_GIT=y
> +BR2_TARGET_ARM_TRUSTED_FIRMWARE_CUSTOM_REPO_URL="https://git.trustedfirmware.org/TF-A/trusted-firmware-a.git"
> +BR2_TARGET_ARM_TRUSTED_FIRMWARE_CUSTOM_REPO_VERSION="v2.9.0"
Could you use v2.9 instead? It's pointing to the same commit, but it
will make sure that our patch
boot/arm-trusted-firmware/v2.9/0001-build-tools-avoid-unnecessary-link.patch
gets applied.
> +BR2_TARGET_ARM_TRUSTED_FIRMWARE_PLATFORM="rk3399"
> +BR2_TARGET_ARM_TRUSTED_FIRMWARE_IMAGES=""
> +BR2_TARGET_ARM_TRUSTED_FIRMWARE_NEEDS_ARM32_TOOLCHAIN=y
> +BR2_TARGET_UBOOT=y
You need to set a fixed version of U-Boot.
> +BR2_TARGET_UBOOT_BOARD_DEFCONFIG="roc-pc-rk3399"
> +BR2_TARGET_UBOOT_NEEDS_DTC=y
> +BR2_TARGET_UBOOT_NEEDS_PYTHON3=y
> +BR2_TARGET_UBOOT_NEEDS_ATF_BL31=y
> +BR2_TARGET_UBOOT_NEEDS_ATF_BL31_ELF=y
> +BR2_TARGET_UBOOT_FORMAT_CUSTOM=y
> +BR2_TARGET_UBOOT_FORMAT_CUSTOM_NAME="u-boot.itb"
> +BR2_TARGET_UBOOT_SPL=y
> +BR2_TARGET_UBOOT_SPL_NAME="idbloader.img"
> +BR2_PACKAGE_HOST_DOSFSTOOLS=y
> +BR2_PACKAGE_HOST_GENIMAGE=y
> +BR2_PACKAGE_HOST_MTOOLS=y
> +BR2_PACKAGE_HOST_UBOOT_TOOLS=y
Not sure here why BR2_PACKAGE_HOST_UBOOT_TOOLS=y is needed?
Could you rework your patch to address those small aspects and send an
updated version?
Thanks a lot!
Thomas Petazzoni
--
Thomas Petazzoni, co-owner and CEO, Bootlin
Embedded Linux and Kernel engineering and training
https://bootlin.com
_______________________________________________
buildroot mailing list
buildroot@buildroot.org
https://lists.buildroot.org/mailman/listinfo/buildroot
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2023-08-08 21:06 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-07-10 21:21 [Buildroot] [PATCH v2 0/1] configs/roc_rk3399_pc: Bring back and update the Roberto Medina
2023-07-10 21:21 ` [Buildroot] [PATCH v2 1/1] configs/roc_rk3399_pc: Bring back and update the configuration for the rockchip rk3399 built by firefly Roberto Medina
2023-07-14 18:08 ` Kilian Zinnecker via buildroot
2023-07-24 11:01 ` Roberto Medina
2023-07-25 8:21 ` Da Xue
2023-08-08 21:06 ` Thomas Petazzoni via buildroot [this message]
2023-08-11 16:28 ` Roberto Medina
2023-08-11 22:29 ` Thomas Petazzoni via buildroot
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20230808230609.0eaa80e8@windsurf \
--to=buildroot@buildroot.org \
--cc=kilian.zinnecker@mail.de \
--cc=robertoxmed@gmail.com \
--cc=thomas.petazzoni@bootlin.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox