From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from smtp4.osuosl.org (smtp4.osuosl.org [140.211.166.137]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D160CC0015E for ; Fri, 11 Aug 2023 22:26:43 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by smtp4.osuosl.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7E3B141E84; Fri, 11 Aug 2023 22:26:43 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 smtp4.osuosl.org 7E3B141E84 X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at osuosl.org Received: from smtp4.osuosl.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (smtp4.osuosl.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id DoHmYcX1lBmI; Fri, 11 Aug 2023 22:26:42 +0000 (UTC) Received: from ash.osuosl.org (ash.osuosl.org [140.211.166.34]) by smtp4.osuosl.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7676E41E82; Fri, 11 Aug 2023 22:26:41 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 smtp4.osuosl.org 7676E41E82 Received: from smtp1.osuosl.org (smtp1.osuosl.org [140.211.166.138]) by ash.osuosl.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B9C0C1BF5F6 for ; Fri, 11 Aug 2023 22:26:40 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by smtp1.osuosl.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9320D84060 for ; Fri, 11 Aug 2023 22:26:40 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 smtp1.osuosl.org 9320D84060 X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at osuosl.org Received: from smtp1.osuosl.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (smtp1.osuosl.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id CB9-bFU1AlCF for ; Fri, 11 Aug 2023 22:26:39 +0000 (UTC) Received: from relay1-d.mail.gandi.net (relay1-d.mail.gandi.net [IPv6:2001:4b98:dc4:8::221]) by smtp1.osuosl.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 251568404C for ; Fri, 11 Aug 2023 22:26:38 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 smtp1.osuosl.org 251568404C Received: by mail.gandi.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 9F95B240002; Fri, 11 Aug 2023 22:26:35 +0000 (UTC) Date: Sat, 12 Aug 2023 00:26:34 +0200 To: Arnout Vandecappelle Message-ID: <20230812002634.45f2eff2@windsurf> In-Reply-To: References: <20230729212159.403148-1-thomas.petazzoni@bootlin.com> Organization: Bootlin X-Mailer: Claws Mail 4.1.1 (GTK 3.24.38; x86_64-redhat-linux-gnu) MIME-Version: 1.0 X-GND-Sasl: thomas.petazzoni@bootlin.com X-Mailman-Original-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=bootlin.com; s=gm1; t=1691792796; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: content-transfer-encoding:content-transfer-encoding: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=WdWVifMQnA+2c6HtpSAC25A+QNFEZ8tJaCwwfqvukDk=; b=G94ioHP7sKAB4lkeUtmkrQz3DUmw+St/PD7e4V9t+btIQyvYTWrBWRfXi1ZK1v2cQUffRz zPlu6HsETxPng9QtnsjbAaqHRTnLOnVQP/Bj7BfnR9RZovRYFXtYd7btKB6kVyoId2c7kW rk9vBQ9o6y5qWGp5rXoGTKxqOtU3sPr4HKf9Tty0Ez9O/YGDISa7CgjVP4Ux/0SDniP5DN OWRUbwkZXnQ8PLm0hcBZRktxc4Mru8gtb9MfFF0J9sx0MJMC3G32wuwMqJKax18pvLeiQ7 hnfuOFGRUlL9+igDdh/R0ZA88a1BQyFmpeii9Sw/ZcA2a6cluY2b8AlGcgVP5g== X-Mailman-Original-Authentication-Results: smtp1.osuosl.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key, unprotected) header.d=bootlin.com header.i=@bootlin.com header.a=rsa-sha256 header.s=gm1 header.b=G94ioHP7 Subject: Re: [Buildroot] [PATCH] package/crun: allow building with uClibc X-BeenThere: buildroot@buildroot.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussion and development of buildroot List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , From: Thomas Petazzoni via buildroot Reply-To: Thomas Petazzoni Cc: Christian Stewart , Buildroot List Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Errors-To: buildroot-bounces@buildroot.org Sender: "buildroot" On Fri, 11 Aug 2023 22:06:40 +0200 Arnout Vandecappelle wrote: > I believe this is going to create problems again, because we have a few > toolchain configurations that are used in the autobuilders and that have really > old uClibc versions. > > As I said in a previous mail, we may want to drop these and move to bootlin > toolchains instead. But then, for some of them there is no bootlin toolchain > equivalent... > > Also, those autobuilder toolchains make sure we still have some testing of old > GCC versions, which we probably do want to keep. > > So, we should either: > > - update all the autobuilder toolchains with newer uClibc; > - switch those toolchains to bootlin toolchains; > - switch those toolchains to internal toolchains; > - add autobuilder exceptions; > - add some Kconfig construct to identify fexecve availability. The autobuilders are now doing fully random testing I believe, so they are no longer testing some of those "special toolchains" we used to have. They are either using well-known external toolchains, or building internal toolchains. In any case, I don't think we should worry too much about uClibc features, and assume that people should have a recent uClibc, with the uClibc configuration as it is in Buildroot. Thomas -- Thomas Petazzoni, co-owner and CEO, Bootlin Embedded Linux and Kernel engineering and training https://bootlin.com _______________________________________________ buildroot mailing list buildroot@buildroot.org https://lists.buildroot.org/mailman/listinfo/buildroot