From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from smtp4.osuosl.org (smtp4.osuosl.org [140.211.166.137]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C02BDC04A6A for ; Fri, 11 Aug 2023 22:29:12 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by smtp4.osuosl.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6A0AD41E84; Fri, 11 Aug 2023 22:29:12 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 smtp4.osuosl.org 6A0AD41E84 X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at osuosl.org Received: from smtp4.osuosl.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (smtp4.osuosl.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id QramYG5E9w2l; Fri, 11 Aug 2023 22:29:11 +0000 (UTC) Received: from ash.osuosl.org (ash.osuosl.org [140.211.166.34]) by smtp4.osuosl.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6869241ECA; Fri, 11 Aug 2023 22:29:10 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 smtp4.osuosl.org 6869241ECA Received: from smtp2.osuosl.org (smtp2.osuosl.org [140.211.166.133]) by ash.osuosl.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id ACB521BF5F6 for ; Fri, 11 Aug 2023 22:29:08 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by smtp2.osuosl.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 860884063E for ; Fri, 11 Aug 2023 22:29:08 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 smtp2.osuosl.org 860884063E X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at osuosl.org Received: from smtp2.osuosl.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (smtp2.osuosl.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id u_N9Pviy9rZs for ; Fri, 11 Aug 2023 22:29:07 +0000 (UTC) Received: from relay2-d.mail.gandi.net (relay2-d.mail.gandi.net [217.70.183.194]) by smtp2.osuosl.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 0418B4059D for ; Fri, 11 Aug 2023 22:29:06 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 smtp2.osuosl.org 0418B4059D Received: by mail.gandi.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 5A62C40004; Fri, 11 Aug 2023 22:29:03 +0000 (UTC) Date: Sat, 12 Aug 2023 00:29:02 +0200 To: Roberto Medina Message-ID: <20230812002902.5ce271b0@windsurf> In-Reply-To: <88906c88-9597-4f1d-a5d2-244337ac0fdf@gmail.com> References: <20230710212151.574040-1-robertoxmed@gmail.com> <20230710212151.574040-2-robertoxmed@gmail.com> <20230808230609.0eaa80e8@windsurf> <88906c88-9597-4f1d-a5d2-244337ac0fdf@gmail.com> Organization: Bootlin X-Mailer: Claws Mail 4.1.1 (GTK 3.24.38; x86_64-redhat-linux-gnu) MIME-Version: 1.0 X-GND-Sasl: thomas.petazzoni@bootlin.com X-Mailman-Original-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=bootlin.com; s=gm1; t=1691792943; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: content-transfer-encoding:content-transfer-encoding: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=trLcNfcZM6aI5NGGgBehJ4Kh7aAEiV013X7DXRihJa4=; b=VXQTfOpsh1Rof/nI6ik2xhMecdZRF4cuP5Kg6etLko5LG2aorMfdD8CxMIc0Oeby9L7kZZ 6fR8tWnaUAA5F+SSJMNe9XdohtohbKSejtc8OfOGM+TFhEWxWSPnaPP8fSHzLlXJQksnte 8dLyId7Ii98iclW6VDyKz4kr0T3Dk8sxvTiNZPi6+sSxXyQfOEEKI5sQJndphGuO+JPZMw UxVkuIrka1ALyUAEUWBpgyBmD3kLVe1nZsfHeIq+LI9DMBGdMJPbL7ssQiJNfMxPS/ti6P PbwqlLTRayNHBd7jyi74jxLNjRl9pCb0FMvdtzBm0h1yJql4BkfIIef53okyqg== X-Mailman-Original-Authentication-Results: smtp2.osuosl.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key, unprotected) header.d=bootlin.com header.i=@bootlin.com header.a=rsa-sha256 header.s=gm1 header.b=VXQTfOps Subject: Re: [Buildroot] [PATCH v2 1/1] configs/roc_rk3399_pc: Bring back and update the configuration for the rockchip rk3399 built by firefly. X-BeenThere: buildroot@buildroot.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussion and development of buildroot List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , From: Thomas Petazzoni via buildroot Reply-To: Thomas Petazzoni Cc: kilian.zinnecker@mail.de, buildroot@buildroot.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Errors-To: buildroot-bounces@buildroot.org Sender: "buildroot" On Fri, 11 Aug 2023 18:28:43 +0200 Roberto Medina wrote: > Thank you for your reviews. I submitted a v3 for review but I will > answer the following here as well. > > On 8/8/23 23:06, Thomas Petazzoni wrote: > > Why this custom size rather than leaving the default? > > If I leave this value as default I will get the following error: > > Copying files into the device: __populate_fs: Could not alocate block in > ext2 filesystem while writing file "stm_core.ko". This indeed means that what's on the rootfs exceeds the default ext2/ext4 filesystem image size, so increasing it is fine. Thanks, Thomas -- Thomas Petazzoni, co-owner and CEO, Bootlin Embedded Linux and Kernel engineering and training https://bootlin.com _______________________________________________ buildroot mailing list buildroot@buildroot.org https://lists.buildroot.org/mailman/listinfo/buildroot