Buildroot Archive on lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Thomas Petazzoni via buildroot <buildroot@buildroot.org>
To: Julien Olivain <ju.o@free.fr>
Cc: buildroot@buildroot.org
Subject: Re: [Buildroot] [PATCH next 1/1] package/kexec: fix link error when BR2_OPTIMIZE_0=y
Date: Tue, 22 Aug 2023 22:35:46 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20230822223546.46d9ba7e@windsurf> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <f2414860dfc205f44efba3d43cdddedb@free.fr>

On Tue, 22 Aug 2023 22:08:32 +0200
Julien Olivain <ju.o@free.fr> wrote:

> This could indeed go into the master branch. Since 2023.08-rc2 was
> already tagged, I imagined only major fixes would go into master.
> This one has been longstanding issue (so apparently not so important).
> 
> In fact, reading the Buildroot documentation release engineering at [1]
> does really allow me to decide what kind of commits (security, bugfixes,
> new features, minor improvements like typos) should go to master/next.
> 
> Recently, I had the same interpretation in [2] that a minor improvement
> (in which nothing was actually broken) should go to next. Yann preferred
> master.
> 
> If you summarize those situations, I would be happy to propose a doc
> improvement.

Essentially, the idea after -rc1 is to stop applying version bumps and
major changes in master so that master progressively converges to
something "stable" that we can release. So, we can still merge
improvements and fixes to master. As such, the build fix for kexec
definitely qualifies. The license file improvement for lsof that you
pointed also qualifies: it's an improvement, very low risk. Of course,
there's always a grey area, even for version bumps: sometimes we take a
version bump in master because it fixes security issues. Sometimes we
prefer to backport the patch fixing the security issue rather than
bumping when the number of other changes that take place with the
version bump is too large.

Does that help? :-)

Thomas
-- 
Thomas Petazzoni, co-owner and CEO, Bootlin
Embedded Linux and Kernel engineering and training
https://bootlin.com
_______________________________________________
buildroot mailing list
buildroot@buildroot.org
https://lists.buildroot.org/mailman/listinfo/buildroot

  reply	other threads:[~2023-08-22 20:35 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2023-08-22 19:23 [Buildroot] [PATCH next 1/1] package/kexec: fix link error when BR2_OPTIMIZE_0=y Julien Olivain
2023-08-22 19:35 ` Thomas Petazzoni via buildroot
2023-08-22 20:08   ` Julien Olivain
2023-08-22 20:35     ` Thomas Petazzoni via buildroot [this message]
2023-08-22 20:42       ` Julien Olivain
2024-07-12 19:09 ` Arnout Vandecappelle via buildroot
2024-08-06 22:44   ` Peter Korsgaard

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20230822223546.46d9ba7e@windsurf \
    --to=buildroot@buildroot.org \
    --cc=ju.o@free.fr \
    --cc=thomas.petazzoni@bootlin.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox