From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from smtp1.osuosl.org (smtp1.osuosl.org [140.211.166.138]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 6B3ACC3DA66 for ; Wed, 23 Aug 2023 21:05:03 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by smtp1.osuosl.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 131B08211E; Wed, 23 Aug 2023 21:05:03 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 smtp1.osuosl.org 131B08211E X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at osuosl.org Received: from smtp1.osuosl.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (smtp1.osuosl.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id MFDM61Jk3K-N; Wed, 23 Aug 2023 21:05:02 +0000 (UTC) Received: from ash.osuosl.org (ash.osuosl.org [140.211.166.34]) by smtp1.osuosl.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1221082127; Wed, 23 Aug 2023 21:05:01 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 smtp1.osuosl.org 1221082127 Received: from smtp2.osuosl.org (smtp2.osuosl.org [140.211.166.133]) by ash.osuosl.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7082C1BF2A4 for ; Wed, 23 Aug 2023 21:04:59 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by smtp2.osuosl.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4A250402F7 for ; Wed, 23 Aug 2023 21:04:59 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 smtp2.osuosl.org 4A250402F7 X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at osuosl.org Received: from smtp2.osuosl.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (smtp2.osuosl.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 8VqjDgNJicKz for ; Wed, 23 Aug 2023 21:04:57 +0000 (UTC) Received: from relay9-d.mail.gandi.net (relay9-d.mail.gandi.net [IPv6:2001:4b98:dc4:8::229]) by smtp2.osuosl.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 15774400BF for ; Wed, 23 Aug 2023 21:04:56 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 smtp2.osuosl.org 15774400BF Received: by mail.gandi.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 02A2FFF806; Wed, 23 Aug 2023 21:04:53 +0000 (UTC) Date: Wed, 23 Aug 2023 23:04:52 +0200 To: Julien Olivain Message-ID: <20230823230452.4552936c@windsurf> In-Reply-To: <695d398827606c825566d544ee8665c5@free.fr> References: <20230822194922.71368-1-ju.o@free.fr> <20230822234113.12dd618b@windsurf> <695d398827606c825566d544ee8665c5@free.fr> Organization: Bootlin X-Mailer: Claws Mail 4.1.1 (GTK 3.24.38; x86_64-redhat-linux-gnu) MIME-Version: 1.0 X-GND-Sasl: thomas.petazzoni@bootlin.com X-Mailman-Original-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=bootlin.com; s=gm1; t=1692824694; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: content-transfer-encoding:content-transfer-encoding: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=lRY4L41t2JzxvuNqVdbY/QNo3kPofvm7o+dMcQ3myoU=; b=l79bIYYLEkOkkasFZP1/gwYlcVVnC2wo8I6wHX1nUug96ukimAQ7LHZ/4D3GhjNUJAZ1e1 /WNhgCDX1dKCLJIAO6ErCx2GUynumLEuKi1WLrbowY6WBA/xp37AJBwT6T4tzF2yYUgpPK 9L+5YHJ/E72kgakUJjSyZ19V3xF3HOU8qpcNxt4xP0mUZJlWgPA+VOIou4U5sr88cgQpNS JN1sR+TQBCiSAeXk/PmOUV/hryZjLMnTOXFGNu6x6rr6p6xckSXhHk/XWHbDe8LD99kvHD 9ODZmsiP+2Hdn7JIXpSFeyEKO6CFG1oEuje4VnmHQMnq6RNXen/1uak6YttTMg== X-Mailman-Original-Authentication-Results: smtp2.osuosl.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key, unprotected) header.d=bootlin.com header.i=@bootlin.com header.a=rsa-sha256 header.s=gm1 header.b=l79bIYYL Subject: Re: [Buildroot] [PATCH 1/2] package/screen: security bump to version 4.9.1 X-BeenThere: buildroot@buildroot.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussion and development of buildroot List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , From: Thomas Petazzoni via buildroot Reply-To: Thomas Petazzoni Cc: buildroot@buildroot.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Errors-To: buildroot-bounces@buildroot.org Sender: "buildroot" Hello Julien, On Wed, 23 Aug 2023 21:12:15 +0200 Julien Olivain wrote: > This is not a mistake. It is more an unfortunate technical issue. My > original series was including a new screen runtime test in patch 2/2. > > I'll shortly explain, because this situation might happen again: my > internet provider smtp (namely smtp.free.fr) decided few month ago to > deploy an "AI based" anti-spam filter. Apparently, the thing was not > trained enough on "git send-email" content. This generates many false > positives, specifically on runtime tests. I'm working with the > postmaster to solve the issue and complete this series when > possible. Sorry about that. Ah ah, so free.fr thinks you are spamming us with too many runtime tests? :-) Thomas -- Thomas Petazzoni, co-owner and CEO, Bootlin Embedded Linux and Kernel engineering and training https://bootlin.com _______________________________________________ buildroot mailing list buildroot@buildroot.org https://lists.buildroot.org/mailman/listinfo/buildroot