From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from smtp2.osuosl.org (smtp2.osuosl.org [140.211.166.133]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 413C5CD495D for ; Thu, 21 Sep 2023 06:45:07 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by smtp2.osuosl.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BAE7440474; Thu, 21 Sep 2023 06:45:06 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 smtp2.osuosl.org BAE7440474 X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at osuosl.org Received: from smtp2.osuosl.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (smtp2.osuosl.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 6wWB70MGSs0F; Thu, 21 Sep 2023 06:45:06 +0000 (UTC) Received: from ash.osuosl.org (ash.osuosl.org [140.211.166.34]) by smtp2.osuosl.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0A4F1402E0; Thu, 21 Sep 2023 06:45:04 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 smtp2.osuosl.org 0A4F1402E0 Received: from smtp2.osuosl.org (smtp2.osuosl.org [140.211.166.133]) by ash.osuosl.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7D0001BF990 for ; Thu, 21 Sep 2023 06:45:03 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by smtp2.osuosl.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 55F62402E0 for ; Thu, 21 Sep 2023 06:45:03 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 smtp2.osuosl.org 55F62402E0 X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at osuosl.org Received: from smtp2.osuosl.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (smtp2.osuosl.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id enXiDndNYRpd for ; Thu, 21 Sep 2023 06:45:02 +0000 (UTC) Received: from relay1-d.mail.gandi.net (relay1-d.mail.gandi.net [217.70.183.193]) by smtp2.osuosl.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 25593400AB for ; Thu, 21 Sep 2023 06:45:01 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 smtp2.osuosl.org 25593400AB Received: by mail.gandi.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 12A4E240006; Thu, 21 Sep 2023 06:44:58 +0000 (UTC) Date: Thu, 21 Sep 2023 08:44:58 +0200 To: Daniel Lang Message-ID: <20230921084458.1aff7ce8@windsurf> In-Reply-To: <80570176-70c3-4eae-9df6-54242820b8e8@gmx.at> References: <20230920043113.36674-2-dalang@gmx.at> <20230920091208.62a8b2fb@windsurf> <20230920173434.GE512384@scaer> <80570176-70c3-4eae-9df6-54242820b8e8@gmx.at> Organization: Bootlin X-Mailer: Claws Mail 4.1.1 (GTK 3.24.38; x86_64-redhat-linux-gnu) MIME-Version: 1.0 X-GND-Sasl: thomas.petazzoni@bootlin.com X-Mailman-Original-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=bootlin.com; s=gm1; t=1695278699; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: content-transfer-encoding:content-transfer-encoding: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=UADGl39RbHxrEkgiUu+hSurzvpn80lOS2DrKUt4ydIo=; b=gnQd6G45wxNgxYEMgJxx8OEOwwCrVZU1HhQM/qell3kt3PTJSiQhL8v7J9N9k56Hj846dA Lp5CvUsPshBCIcB+CAHkcz8gF6XXkPY9axK8XX0lofNRfHQ8OKXaCAeYF1BpzpvdhMiAVd 2QWVT/wXUIOfx0XmhMcwwHo1RzhWI8m0ln8fzpLslnfD4v/cDddoJOsXmNqjnCIuYHNWl5 tgjzifZ3VUcFRIkCrmLqzVI97EGqrgplxH0u0Vj0Es05T0lmhb/H1H9K8RM9VHK73qn3WT xr/LgRTS5eF02bVWuCOyGUzix4pcABw8L/O6uecaLOQqyaEl4fzFSeEIXpwT/Q== X-Mailman-Original-Authentication-Results: smtp2.osuosl.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key, unprotected) header.d=bootlin.com header.i=@bootlin.com header.a=rsa-sha256 header.s=gm1 header.b=gnQd6G45 Subject: Re: [Buildroot] [PATCH v2] package/bind: drop CVE-2017-3139 from IGNORE_CVES X-BeenThere: buildroot@buildroot.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussion and development of buildroot List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , From: Thomas Petazzoni via buildroot Reply-To: Thomas Petazzoni Cc: "Yann E. MORIN" , buildroot@buildroot.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Errors-To: buildroot-bounces@buildroot.org Sender: "buildroot" On Thu, 21 Sep 2023 06:09:38 +0200 Daniel Lang wrote: > Not sure pkg-stats would be the right place as, at least in my uses of it, > I simply expect it to collect information and present it to me. > Just like it doesn't flag outdated packages, I wouldn't expect it to flag > mismatched CVEs or outdated CPEs for that matter. I'm not sure to follow you here. pkg-stats is a general tool to help with package maintenance. It provides things like the number of check-package warnings, the number of patches, the list of CVEs affecting the package, so it's a perfect fit to also list the CVEs ignored but not affecting the package. > I haven't looked at check-package closely, but the actual checking should > be doable. > The problem that I see is NVD's new API, because the initial download of > all CVEs now takes ~30 minutes or so. Seeing as check-package is run on > Gitlab CI for every push, the database needs to somehow be kept between > runs to avoid re-downloading everything. I don't think putting this logic in check-package is reasonable. There is nothing CVE related in check-package right, and like you point out, the fact that it needs the CVE database is a big change that is going to be annoying. I maintain my position that this should be done in pkg-stats, where we already do all the CVE matching dance, as it's a simple addition to pkg-stats. Thomas -- Thomas Petazzoni, co-owner and CEO, Bootlin Embedded Linux and Kernel engineering and training https://bootlin.com _______________________________________________ buildroot mailing list buildroot@buildroot.org https://lists.buildroot.org/mailman/listinfo/buildroot