From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from smtp2.osuosl.org (smtp2.osuosl.org [140.211.166.133]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 19D40C4332F for ; Sat, 4 Nov 2023 17:41:57 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by smtp2.osuosl.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BC92D40352; Sat, 4 Nov 2023 17:41:56 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 smtp2.osuosl.org BC92D40352 X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at osuosl.org Received: from smtp2.osuosl.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (smtp2.osuosl.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id ULyVWcGt031a; Sat, 4 Nov 2023 17:41:56 +0000 (UTC) Received: from ash.osuosl.org (ash.osuosl.org [140.211.166.34]) by smtp2.osuosl.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AAD9640167; Sat, 4 Nov 2023 17:41:54 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 smtp2.osuosl.org AAD9640167 Received: from smtp2.osuosl.org (smtp2.osuosl.org [140.211.166.133]) by ash.osuosl.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 66B981BF21A for ; Sat, 4 Nov 2023 17:41:48 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by smtp2.osuosl.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4968A40167 for ; Sat, 4 Nov 2023 17:41:48 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 smtp2.osuosl.org 4968A40167 X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at osuosl.org Received: from smtp2.osuosl.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (smtp2.osuosl.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Mj80cRdIhStR for ; Sat, 4 Nov 2023 17:41:47 +0000 (UTC) Received: from relay1-d.mail.gandi.net (relay1-d.mail.gandi.net [217.70.183.193]) by smtp2.osuosl.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B622B4014D for ; Sat, 4 Nov 2023 17:41:46 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 smtp2.osuosl.org B622B4014D Received: by mail.gandi.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id E8684240002; Sat, 4 Nov 2023 17:41:43 +0000 (UTC) Date: Sat, 4 Nov 2023 18:41:42 +0100 To: Fabrice Fontaine Message-ID: <20231104184142.24723c2d@windsurf> In-Reply-To: <20231104155857.110364-1-fontaine.fabrice@gmail.com> References: <20231104155857.110364-1-fontaine.fabrice@gmail.com> Organization: Bootlin X-Mailer: Claws Mail 4.1.1 (GTK 3.24.38; x86_64-redhat-linux-gnu) MIME-Version: 1.0 X-GND-Sasl: thomas.petazzoni@bootlin.com X-Mailman-Original-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=bootlin.com; s=gm1; t=1699119704; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: content-transfer-encoding:content-transfer-encoding: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=tDjtQGEW3I63G4XhVNu+S+6Urm4xJsgofJNA2Bch9L4=; b=CnECxmnwlrXy3y6WOlS0A8bvId0iiBbCv5nzL7j/51otbk55POw5B/8ssUKmKFT7LUNbh0 BHiT41bYR1O4OZTeSWvXlk0rHvuoI8YdfW9TJayKN7RCNMdGJFlcQbLsWOIfPeetbTGbdK AcEQSnwO/E1HPm6Xe8m5eNvWdDZM7d5Fir/U/iElvnpvAxTCvu3jbACFAe5zi2Jo+Lkw87 LUcHqjZgnAN09f15MrDdMqzc8ghDI1F7AjbywFree5DkTFyhO2EKl/fVmuKb3ypHXUTNUl IhqEcSPX36wto1yAMK3m94ihqKAiqt8cbclZdNt1V7dN6YL+fQktaXPOzhz0Xw== X-Mailman-Original-Authentication-Results: smtp2.osuosl.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key, unprotected) header.d=bootlin.com header.i=@bootlin.com header.a=rsa-sha256 header.s=gm1 header.b=CnECxmnw Subject: Re: [Buildroot] [PATCH 1/1] package/ltrace: fix musl build X-BeenThere: buildroot@buildroot.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussion and development of buildroot List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , From: Thomas Petazzoni via buildroot Reply-To: Thomas Petazzoni Cc: buildroot@buildroot.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Errors-To: buildroot-bounces@buildroot.org Sender: "buildroot" On Sat, 4 Nov 2023 16:58:57 +0100 Fabrice Fontaine wrote: > Fix the following musl build failure raised since commit > bf9583a50276f52edbc37d9f85df5f2cc7fdb5dc: > > checking host system type... mips-buildroot-linux-musl > > Fixes: > - http://autobuild.buildroot.org/results/a3a5c46e8562d3f091a9b4b205322168fbf9d16b > > Signed-off-by: Fabrice Fontaine Thanks for solving this issue. > +Signed-off-by: Fabrice Fontaine > +Upstream: unsent yet Doesn't that defeat the purpose of the Upstream: flag entirely? Isn't the idea precisely to strongly encourage (not to say "require") that patches be sent upstream? Thanks! Thomas -- Thomas Petazzoni, co-owner and CEO, Bootlin Embedded Linux and Kernel engineering and training https://bootlin.com _______________________________________________ buildroot mailing list buildroot@buildroot.org https://lists.buildroot.org/mailman/listinfo/buildroot