From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from smtp2.osuosl.org (smtp2.osuosl.org [140.211.166.133]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 1027CC61D97 for ; Fri, 24 Nov 2023 08:43:14 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by smtp2.osuosl.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A7998401AE; Fri, 24 Nov 2023 08:43:13 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 smtp2.osuosl.org A7998401AE X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at osuosl.org Received: from smtp2.osuosl.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (smtp2.osuosl.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id GgwwOVDC8zRH; Fri, 24 Nov 2023 08:43:12 +0000 (UTC) Received: from ash.osuosl.org (ash.osuosl.org [140.211.166.34]) by smtp2.osuosl.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id ADEF841466; Fri, 24 Nov 2023 08:43:11 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 smtp2.osuosl.org ADEF841466 Received: from smtp3.osuosl.org (smtp3.osuosl.org [140.211.166.136]) by ash.osuosl.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 726D01BF5AA for ; Fri, 24 Nov 2023 08:43:09 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by smtp3.osuosl.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4B3BC613D3 for ; Fri, 24 Nov 2023 08:43:09 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 smtp3.osuosl.org 4B3BC613D3 X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at osuosl.org Received: from smtp3.osuosl.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (smtp3.osuosl.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id aXeczMiVcWw0 for ; Fri, 24 Nov 2023 08:43:08 +0000 (UTC) Received: from relay8-d.mail.gandi.net (relay8-d.mail.gandi.net [IPv6:2001:4b98:dc4:8::228]) by smtp3.osuosl.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 3FC2B613CA for ; Fri, 24 Nov 2023 08:43:08 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 smtp3.osuosl.org 3FC2B613CA Received: by mail.gandi.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 4753F1BF20A; Fri, 24 Nov 2023 08:43:06 +0000 (UTC) Date: Fri, 24 Nov 2023 09:43:05 +0100 To: Adam Duskett Message-ID: <20231124094305.64c322bd@windsurf> In-Reply-To: References: <20231123000819.488595-1-adam.duskett@amarulasolutions.com> <20231123000819.488595-3-adam.duskett@amarulasolutions.com> <20231123144454.50fd7944@windsurf> Organization: Bootlin X-Mailer: Claws Mail 4.1.1 (GTK 3.24.38; x86_64-redhat-linux-gnu) MIME-Version: 1.0 X-GND-Sasl: thomas.petazzoni@bootlin.com X-Mailman-Original-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=bootlin.com; s=gm1; t=1700815386; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: content-transfer-encoding:content-transfer-encoding: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=r5YmyIi32bjeUzEjawLsVfZYqzQS74kAA4ZoctG1No0=; b=OuB6nwPcPIg/6+vR8KoEKyv0A0OqqjhuL5nAcqYydHY5J17M/Yg8lqJIuS8jneAs5gxc6w cXuzjV1nLKgueOfbt9VIR6K1E2+Ki/RwHazXxGalGCfLU+B5pQP0amO4APU1MvRbbQjT82 ON3hUNxELz+4fN0cn/6i6fnacIuja3S1HNCUKP5uBtuyye8RC83kyfXR82+abdvcj9vttX a09quc2gBg23TcURczmQOv5tWpplH0KwWncqjZolxEPbA6jS/UXShDDPGU3q41wZ42Wzbj mjpDy3XoGWlE0PX7JCf8HfHePOFME+XltpktM9uTHVvcER81cPYqS6F/g/E43g== X-Mailman-Original-Authentication-Results: smtp3.osuosl.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key, unprotected) header.d=bootlin.com header.i=@bootlin.com header.a=rsa-sha256 header.s=gm1 header.b=OuB6nwPc Subject: Re: [Buildroot] [PATCH/next 02/13] package/dmenu-wayland: new package X-BeenThere: buildroot@buildroot.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussion and development of buildroot List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , From: Thomas Petazzoni via buildroot Reply-To: Thomas Petazzoni Cc: Eric Le Bihan , Raphael Pavlidis , buildroot@buildroot.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Errors-To: buildroot-bounces@buildroot.org Sender: "buildroot" Hello, On Thu, 23 Nov 2023 12:13:32 -0700 Adam Duskett wrote: > Forgot to mention, does it really matter if I use > ln -sf dmenu-wl $(TARGET_DIR)/usr/bin/dmenu vs what is there now? Does it > not achieve the same goal? Well in: define DMENU_WAYLAND_SYMLINK_DMENU_WL cd $(TARGET_DIR)/usr/bin && \ ln -sf dmenu-wl dmenu endef the indentation was not correct, so I wanted to point this out. But while writing this, I realized that: define DMENU_WAYLAND_SYMLINK_DMENU_WL ln -sf dmenu-wl $(TARGET_DIR)/usr/bin/dmenu endef was simpler and cleaner. I'm not sure how you don't realize that doing directly "ln" is simpler than cd+ln. Best regards, Thomas -- Thomas Petazzoni, co-owner and CEO, Bootlin Embedded Linux and Kernel engineering and training https://bootlin.com _______________________________________________ buildroot mailing list buildroot@buildroot.org https://lists.buildroot.org/mailman/listinfo/buildroot