From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from smtp3.osuosl.org (smtp3.osuosl.org [140.211.166.136]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4989EC4706C for ; Sat, 13 Jan 2024 17:45:43 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by smtp3.osuosl.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F118460EA5; Sat, 13 Jan 2024 17:45:42 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 smtp3.osuosl.org F118460EA5 X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at osuosl.org Received: from smtp3.osuosl.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (smtp3.osuosl.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id wWQ3zC3i-ojv; Sat, 13 Jan 2024 17:45:42 +0000 (UTC) Received: from ash.osuosl.org (ash.osuosl.org [140.211.166.34]) by smtp3.osuosl.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4CFA760E92; Sat, 13 Jan 2024 17:45:41 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 smtp3.osuosl.org 4CFA760E92 Received: from smtp2.osuosl.org (smtp2.osuosl.org [140.211.166.133]) by ash.osuosl.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 91A521BF592 for ; Sat, 13 Jan 2024 17:45:39 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by smtp2.osuosl.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 353B740158 for ; Sat, 13 Jan 2024 17:45:39 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 smtp2.osuosl.org 353B740158 X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at osuosl.org Received: from smtp2.osuosl.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (smtp2.osuosl.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 6zbkb6cjFLw3 for ; Sat, 13 Jan 2024 17:45:37 +0000 (UTC) Received: from relay8-d.mail.gandi.net (relay8-d.mail.gandi.net [IPv6:2001:4b98:dc4:8::228]) by smtp2.osuosl.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 80E61400B8 for ; Sat, 13 Jan 2024 17:45:36 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 smtp2.osuosl.org 80E61400B8 Received: by mail.gandi.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 66A5D1BF207; Sat, 13 Jan 2024 17:45:33 +0000 (UTC) Date: Sat, 13 Jan 2024 18:45:32 +0100 To: Peter Korsgaard Message-ID: <20240113184532.3d393158@windsurf> In-Reply-To: <87ply5wtzf.fsf@48ers.dk> References: <20240106095524.0610E81D7B@busybox.osuosl.org> <87ply5wtzf.fsf@48ers.dk> Organization: Bootlin X-Mailer: Claws Mail 4.2.0 (GTK 3.24.38; x86_64-redhat-linux-gnu) MIME-Version: 1.0 X-GND-Sasl: thomas.petazzoni@bootlin.com X-Mailman-Original-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=bootlin.com; s=gm1; t=1705167933; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: content-transfer-encoding:content-transfer-encoding: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=YOGihckuL9f7F04k+lnr3I3lE7ef6Tk+GuoQfOkOvu4=; b=ic/HKzEl9n9vyuf8qymf7G/9kHxiFdXmAfjgV6TjGh24PrYOgcpOgmka/Qj0ZMpCw69+tj PZd5+Rm6jdXf+ffiB+kTAiJ5ejKp1hSCNk/awRly7lsEmY9ICJPYMxsaMAZznNZkyPTgmh 8kfNi+XxJ10y5PsXHttIVqwZwTOdB9LbT70+UbdIAAnuQrstOEq8M26q6AT5dDKeX4O+x2 ch32EfSHJaUuNUmtLFpaKNv+WHhRuBjhvrNoYL8e2pbQ6dkpZ5jmOxrwJ+bze+8x/3X7IM w7rJ3RMECbxgKFS72jy5y6SRjvmSO7HTf7zcZQawkBQaimVQiq1G5jXvJ1CxnA== X-Mailman-Original-Authentication-Results: smtp2.osuosl.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key, unprotected) header.d=bootlin.com header.i=@bootlin.com header.a=rsa-sha256 header.s=gm1 header.b=ic/HKzEl Subject: Re: [Buildroot] [git commit] package/avahi: fix libavahi-client handling X-BeenThere: buildroot@buildroot.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussion and development of buildroot List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , From: Thomas Petazzoni via buildroot Reply-To: Thomas Petazzoni Cc: fontaine.fabrice@gmail.com, Thomas Petazzoni via buildroot Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Errors-To: buildroot-bounces@buildroot.org Sender: "buildroot" Hello Peter, On Sat, 13 Jan 2024 08:52:20 +0100 Peter Korsgaard wrote: > Does this change really make sense in the context of Buildroot? Libavahi > is a library to talk to the avahi daemon, so not very useful without the > daemon. True. To be honest, I didn't put too much thinking when applying Fabrice's patch: the daemon was not strictly needed when building the library, dropping the dependency made sense, so I applied. If there is a runtime dependency on the daemon, then indeed maybe we should keep the dependency. No strong feeling about it, and I certainly wouldn't feel offended if the commit was reverted. Thomas -- Thomas Petazzoni, co-owner and CEO, Bootlin Embedded Linux and Kernel engineering and training https://bootlin.com _______________________________________________ buildroot mailing list buildroot@buildroot.org https://lists.buildroot.org/mailman/listinfo/buildroot