From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from smtp3.osuosl.org (smtp3.osuosl.org [140.211.166.136]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 5B1A1C3DA45 for ; Wed, 10 Jul 2024 09:16:09 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by smtp3.osuosl.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5370560FD6; Wed, 10 Jul 2024 09:16:08 +0000 (UTC) X-Virus-Scanned: amavis at osuosl.org Received: from smtp3.osuosl.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (smtp3.osuosl.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavis, port 10024) with ESMTP id nyamMZ5fTKNY; Wed, 10 Jul 2024 09:16:06 +0000 (UTC) X-Comment: SPF check N/A for local connections - client-ip=140.211.166.34; helo=ash.osuosl.org; envelope-from=buildroot-bounces@buildroot.org; receiver= DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 smtp3.osuosl.org E4D1260FCB Received: from ash.osuosl.org (ash.osuosl.org [140.211.166.34]) by smtp3.osuosl.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E4D1260FCB; Wed, 10 Jul 2024 09:16:05 +0000 (UTC) Received: from smtp4.osuosl.org (smtp4.osuosl.org [140.211.166.137]) by ash.osuosl.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C83AE1BF573 for ; Wed, 10 Jul 2024 09:16:04 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by smtp4.osuosl.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B37F84146F for ; Wed, 10 Jul 2024 09:16:04 +0000 (UTC) X-Virus-Scanned: amavis at osuosl.org Received: from smtp4.osuosl.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (smtp4.osuosl.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavis, port 10024) with ESMTP id 3t4VbI0jes0M for ; Wed, 10 Jul 2024 09:16:03 +0000 (UTC) Received-SPF: Pass (mailfrom) identity=mailfrom; client-ip=2001:4b98:dc4:8::228; helo=relay8-d.mail.gandi.net; envelope-from=thomas.petazzoni@bootlin.com; receiver= DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.4.2 smtp4.osuosl.org 174BF413E7 DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 smtp4.osuosl.org 174BF413E7 Received: from relay8-d.mail.gandi.net (relay8-d.mail.gandi.net [IPv6:2001:4b98:dc4:8::228]) by smtp4.osuosl.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 174BF413E7 for ; Wed, 10 Jul 2024 09:16:02 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail.gandi.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 04ED31BF20E; Wed, 10 Jul 2024 09:15:58 +0000 (UTC) Date: Wed, 10 Jul 2024 11:15:57 +0200 To: Arnout Vandecappelle Message-ID: <20240710111557.6bd8439e@windsurf> In-Reply-To: References: <20240429092326.3247116-1-p-bhagat@ti.com> <20240709225840.3f852ad5@windsurf> Organization: Bootlin X-Mailer: Claws Mail 4.3.0 (GTK 3.24.41; x86_64-redhat-linux-gnu) MIME-Version: 1.0 X-GND-Sasl: thomas.petazzoni@bootlin.com X-Mailman-Original-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=bootlin.com; s=gm1; t=1720602960; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: content-transfer-encoding:content-transfer-encoding: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=dAIRQOJfa6AYooSENxSlFg+GYQDEgEI+PdRW+m1YNys=; b=LQeMiTFL7mse8ttrJbTgwpoub5yUEvZZE89/7e5hb75NAC8qgd9X2PlrYaw78L4olbA1BO E4YJRu5+1Xv7YSC4/zkppDjx5mi4PS5y/Qv0L+PkhjVQrmV3UuhR3NDgZts79wFhwvPVJi Dq058zs+IjpXwwfLfJsgLMb+Dri5jbFnknb/GkzD7HDVec4HQ3nuBvrRQ90YgxqNbKmBR9 TJ7Zf1I8nwSr3hDR49cucJNEsF2cn5BpTIQLZqKhBNLG8ITzKn72lT92B+5sasXIa00x46 BfJ8W0nraoyKx5h32lhbT5u8fL2ZEvvvhm3P1FAAHuENUfwD/kXZciS7Zbm14g== X-Mailman-Original-Authentication-Results: smtp4.osuosl.org; dmarc=pass (p=reject dis=none) header.from=bootlin.com X-Mailman-Original-Authentication-Results: smtp4.osuosl.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key, unprotected) header.d=bootlin.com header.i=@bootlin.com header.a=rsa-sha256 header.s=gm1 header.b=LQeMiTFL Subject: Re: [Buildroot] [RFC, 1/1] configs/am62x-sk: Add fragment for TI tree integration X-BeenThere: buildroot@buildroot.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussion and development of buildroot List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , From: Thomas Petazzoni via buildroot Reply-To: Thomas Petazzoni Cc: Bryan Brattlof , Xuanhao Shi , Gyan Gupta , "Yann E. MORIN" , Chirag Shilwant , Paresh Bhagat , Syed Mohammed Khasim , Paresh Bhagat via buildroot , Andreas Dannenberg , Sai Sree Kartheek Adivi , Romain Naour , Anand Gadiyar Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Errors-To: buildroot-bounces@buildroot.org Sender: "buildroot" Hello Arnout, On Wed, 10 Jul 2024 09:55:43 +0200 Arnout Vandecappelle wrote: > > I'm not sure how we want to standardize things here. Arnout, Peter, > > Yann, Romain, any opinion? > > I think it only makes sense to have both a vendor and an upstream defconfig > in-tree if the vendor defconfig adds some value. For the ST platforms, for > example, I don't know if this is actually the case... ST is doing upstreaming > too well :-) Indeed. > Actually for imx6ull I'm also not sure if the vendor config still > makes sense, AFAIK everything works with upstream kernel... Yes. > For the TI platforms there historically always usually was a big > difference (feature wise) between vendor and upstream kernels, so I > do think it makes a lot of sense to offer both. At least, if this is > still the case :-) > > Just one thing about the naming: I think it should be > imx6ullevk_upstream_defconfig and imx6ullevk_vendor_defconfig to make > the distinction clearer. I haven't looked at this TI series to > evaluate its naming scheme, but you get the idea I guess. I fully agree with this. The current naming is less than obvious, and what you propose would make a lot of sense. With that naming, I believe I would be ready to accept 2 defconfigs for TI platforms for example, one using upstream, one using vendor stuff. Best regards, Thomas -- Thomas Petazzoni, co-owner and CEO, Bootlin Embedded Linux and Kernel engineering and training https://bootlin.com _______________________________________________ buildroot mailing list buildroot@buildroot.org https://lists.buildroot.org/mailman/listinfo/buildroot