Buildroot Archive on lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Thomas Petazzoni via buildroot <buildroot@buildroot.org>
To: Fabrice Fontaine <fontaine.fabrice@gmail.com>
Cc: buildroot@buildroot.org
Subject: Re: [Buildroot] [PATCH 1/1] package/cairo: fix build without NPTL
Date: Sat, 27 Jul 2024 18:36:24 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20240727183624.648b499b@windsurf> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20240726085352.1238297-1-fontaine.fabrice@gmail.com>

On Fri, 26 Jul 2024 10:53:52 +0200
Fabrice Fontaine <fontaine.fabrice@gmail.com> wrote:

> +ifeq ($(BR2_TOOLCHAIN_HAS_THREADS_NPTL),)
> +CAIRO_CFLAGS += -DCAIRO_NO_MUTEX=1
> +endif

Not your fault because it was already like this before, but I believe
92f14307ba670058d0b3692fb8e82753d6ad6868 was wrong. Indeed, it means
that when thread support is enabled, but not with NPTL, we disable
mutex support in cairo. This means that a multi-threaded application
that uses cairo will be using a version of cairo without mutexes, which
seems very wrong.

Not be honest, I am unsure on how to proceed with this. Add a
BR2_TOOLCHAIN_HAS_THREADS_NPTL dependency to cairo?

Maybe retry if toolchains with threads not provided by NPTL continue to
fail building the mutex code? (Though I doubt anything has changed in
this area). Or maybe uClibc-ng has been improved to the point where the
mutex code now builds correctly with !NPTL threads?

Thomas
-- 
Thomas Petazzoni, co-owner and CEO, Bootlin
Embedded Linux and Kernel engineering and training
https://bootlin.com
_______________________________________________
buildroot mailing list
buildroot@buildroot.org
https://lists.buildroot.org/mailman/listinfo/buildroot

  reply	other threads:[~2024-07-27 16:36 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2024-07-26  8:53 [Buildroot] [PATCH 1/1] package/cairo: fix build without NPTL Fabrice Fontaine
2024-07-27 16:36 ` Thomas Petazzoni via buildroot [this message]
2024-08-02 17:28 ` Thomas Petazzoni via buildroot

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20240727183624.648b499b@windsurf \
    --to=buildroot@buildroot.org \
    --cc=fontaine.fabrice@gmail.com \
    --cc=thomas.petazzoni@bootlin.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox