Re: [Buildroot] [PATCH 0/3] tinit and stm32f746_disco_sd_defconfig

[Thomas Petazzoni via buildroot <buildroot@buildroot.org>]

Hello Dario,

On Tue, 20 Aug 2024 20:47:09 +0200
Dario Binacchi <dario.binacchi@amarulasolutions.com> wrote:

> > - I believe you should drop entirely the logo thing in tinit, we don't
> >   have such "logos" in any other Buildroot defconfig, so I don't see
> >   why we would have one for those super small noMMU defconfigs. This
> >   would allow to get rid of tiny-setup.sh stuff.  
> 
> I implemented the logo management only to ensure that the patch
> "board/canaan/k210-soc: use tinit as Linux init process" was backward
> compatible.
> The previous script included the Linux logo. But if this is not an
> issue, I agree with you
>  that it's better to adopt a simpler approach.

I think it could be dropped (perhaps as a preparation commit). No other
Buildroot defconfig has this, it doesn't bring anything really useful,
and is just extra complexity for no benefit.

> > Why do we need a busybox-tiny.config? We already have
> > package/busybox/busybox-minimal.config. How different are they?  
> 
> I think this is a configuration I used for upstreaming the Linux
> display driver.
> I will remove it and use the busybox-minimal.config.

Perfect, thanks a lot!

Thomas
-- 
Thomas Petazzoni, co-owner and CEO, Bootlin
Embedded Linux and Kernel engineering and training
https://bootlin.com
_______________________________________________
buildroot mailing list
buildroot@buildroot.org
https://lists.buildroot.org/mailman/listinfo/buildroot