From: Thomas Petazzoni via buildroot <buildroot@buildroot.org>
To: James Hilliard <james.hilliard1@gmail.com>
Cc: buildroot@buildroot.org, Antoine Tenart <atenart@kernel.org>,
Marcus Folkesson <marcus.folkesson@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [Buildroot] [PATCH v2 2/2] package/swig: bump to version 4.3.0
Date: Mon, 11 Nov 2024 21:44:01 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20241111214401.7ac58b23@windsurf> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CADvTj4oU1W_eKJkOGDvg=Wtad4pfUfn1Ag_DLnGz_FtSr0avtg@mail.gmail.com>
On Mon, 11 Nov 2024 13:25:33 -0700
James Hilliard <james.hilliard1@gmail.com> wrote:
> > Based on your PATCH 1/2, you tested libselinux, but what about the
> > other packages? I certainly don't require testing *all* of them, but
> > since this bump has caused some breakage for libselinux, we can
> > potentially expect some breakage for other packages. Could you build a
> > defconfig with a good number of reverse dependencies enabled, and
> > verify it builds OK, and report this in the commit log?
>
> I pretty much just test built packages individually rather than adding
> them to a defconfig. I think I tested pretty much everything with host-swig
> as a dependency, I didn't bother making sure all could fully build but
> just checked that there weren't any obvious swig compilation errors.
Hm, how did you verify that there were "no obvious swig compilation
errors", without fully building those packages?
Could you provide some more convincing evidence, such as: "here is a
defconfig that I tested, it builds successfully before and after the
bump"?
Thanks a lot!
Thomas
--
Thomas Petazzoni, co-owner and CEO, Bootlin
Embedded Linux and Kernel engineering and training
https://bootlin.com
_______________________________________________
buildroot mailing list
buildroot@buildroot.org
https://lists.buildroot.org/mailman/listinfo/buildroot
prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-11-11 20:44 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-11-10 19:37 [Buildroot] [PATCH v2 1/2] package/libselinux: fix swig 4.3.0 compatibility James Hilliard
2024-11-10 19:37 ` [Buildroot] [PATCH v2 2/2] package/swig: bump to version 4.3.0 James Hilliard
2024-11-11 20:19 ` Thomas Petazzoni via buildroot
2024-11-11 20:25 ` James Hilliard
2024-11-11 20:44 ` Thomas Petazzoni via buildroot [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20241111214401.7ac58b23@windsurf \
--to=buildroot@buildroot.org \
--cc=atenart@kernel.org \
--cc=james.hilliard1@gmail.com \
--cc=marcus.folkesson@gmail.com \
--cc=thomas.petazzoni@bootlin.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox