From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from smtp4.osuosl.org (smtp4.osuosl.org [140.211.166.137]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 60F84C02198 for ; Fri, 14 Feb 2025 22:04:06 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by smtp4.osuosl.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2A05341710; Fri, 14 Feb 2025 22:04:06 +0000 (UTC) X-Virus-Scanned: amavis at osuosl.org Received: from smtp4.osuosl.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (smtp4.osuosl.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavis, port 10024) with ESMTP id jkTYL9Slj_qV; Fri, 14 Feb 2025 22:04:05 +0000 (UTC) X-Comment: SPF check N/A for local connections - client-ip=140.211.166.142; helo=lists1.osuosl.org; envelope-from=buildroot-bounces@buildroot.org; receiver= DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 smtp4.osuosl.org E1A3B417C3 Received: from lists1.osuosl.org (lists1.osuosl.org [140.211.166.142]) by smtp4.osuosl.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E1A3B417C3; Fri, 14 Feb 2025 22:04:04 +0000 (UTC) Received: from smtp4.osuosl.org (smtp4.osuosl.org [IPv6:2605:bc80:3010::137]) by lists1.osuosl.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0E5791E7 for ; Fri, 14 Feb 2025 22:04:03 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by smtp4.osuosl.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F1E09411D1 for ; Fri, 14 Feb 2025 22:04:02 +0000 (UTC) X-Virus-Scanned: amavis at osuosl.org Received: from smtp4.osuosl.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (smtp4.osuosl.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavis, port 10024) with ESMTP id PEVyUMU7-HMk for ; Fri, 14 Feb 2025 22:04:02 +0000 (UTC) Received-SPF: Pass (mailfrom) identity=mailfrom; client-ip=2001:4b98:dc4:8::223; helo=relay3-d.mail.gandi.net; envelope-from=thomas.petazzoni@bootlin.com; receiver= DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.4.2 smtp4.osuosl.org A493740F4B DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 smtp4.osuosl.org A493740F4B Received: from relay3-d.mail.gandi.net (relay3-d.mail.gandi.net [IPv6:2001:4b98:dc4:8::223]) by smtp4.osuosl.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A493740F4B for ; Fri, 14 Feb 2025 22:04:01 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail.gandi.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 9C08120457; Fri, 14 Feb 2025 22:03:57 +0000 (UTC) Date: Fri, 14 Feb 2025 23:03:56 +0100 From: Thomas Petazzoni To: Neal Frager via buildroot Cc: Neal Frager , ibai.erkiaga-elorza@amd.com, luca.ceresoli@bootlin.com, brandon.maier@collins.com, ju.o@free.fr, romain.naour@smile.fr, michal.simek@amd.com Message-ID: <20250214230356.7463c628@windsurf> In-Reply-To: <20250214165402.1128194-4-neal.frager@amd.com> References: <20250214165402.1128194-1-neal.frager@amd.com> <20250214165402.1128194-4-neal.frager@amd.com> Organization: Bootlin X-Mailer: Claws Mail 4.3.0 (GTK 3.24.43; x86_64-redhat-linux-gnu) MIME-Version: 1.0 X-GND-State: clean X-GND-Score: -100 X-GND-Cause: gggruggvucftvghtrhhoucdtuddrgeefvddrtddtgdehtdektdcutefuodetggdotefrodftvfcurfhrohhfihhlvgemucfitefpfffkpdcuggftfghnshhusghstghrihgsvgenuceurghilhhouhhtmecufedtudenucesvcftvggtihhpihgvnhhtshculddquddttddmnecujfgurhepfffhvfevuffkjghfohfogggtgfesthejredtredtvdenucfhrhhomhepvfhhohhmrghsucfrvghtrgiiiihonhhiuceothhhohhmrghsrdhpvghtrgiiiihonhhisegsohhothhlihhnrdgtohhmqeenucggtffrrghtthgvrhhnpeeltdegvdejheegtefgueffgfelhfekvdefudevieeileetleeitdefgfeugffghfenucffohhmrghinhepsghoohhtlhhinhdrtghomhenucfkphepvdgrtddumegtsgduleemkeelgegsmeehhedttdemvddutggvmegsvgehieemrggsfedvmegtrggrvgenucevlhhushhtvghrufhiiigvpedtnecurfgrrhgrmhepihhnvghtpedvrgdtudemtggsudelmeekleegsgemheehtddtmedvudgtvgemsggvheeimegrsgefvdemtggrrggvpdhhvghlohepfihinhgushhurhhfpdhmrghilhhfrhhomhepthhhohhmrghsrdhpvghtrgiiiihonhhisegsohhothhlihhnrdgtohhmpdhnsggprhgtphhtthhopeekpdhrtghpthhtohepsghuihhlughrohhothessghuihhlughrohhothdrohhrghdprhgtphhtthhopehnvggrlhdrfhhrrghgvghrsegrmhgurdgtohhmpdhrtghpthhtohepihgsrghir dgvrhhkihgrghgrqdgvlhhorhiirgesrghmugdrtghomhdprhgtphhtthhopehluhgtrgdrtggvrhgvshholhhisegsohhothhlihhnrdgtohhmpdhrtghpthhtohepsghrrghnughonhdrmhgrihgvrhestgholhhlihhnshdrtghomhdprhgtphhtthhopehjuhdrohesfhhrvggvrdhfrhdprhgtphhtthhopehrohhmrghinhdrnhgrohhurhesshhmihhlvgdrfhhrpdhrtghpthhtohepmhhitghhrghlrdhsihhmvghksegrmhgurdgtohhm X-GND-Sasl: thomas.petazzoni@bootlin.com X-Mailman-Original-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=bootlin.com; s=gm1; t=1739570638; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: content-transfer-encoding:content-transfer-encoding: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=bPiIPJoLCLGgnVil/svvjRM8CL0MWHdaehBs2jaeYw4=; b=ew3s3S5EtDL8Ce2H2g5Y8DirqYdNHyq88tj24M1AEfWb4NQ7RCcWu2wSoeWNTy23swypTR kgNkQVQMM4DLhW1Fif3g05dNY3C5u3f9ul2Hr/vnPXymqlwS5GyidzbYXfiQMnIi6x+Ds6 RW8jNU74KhZEGJJZhywqCvglYO/VfbNHhQNYXWxaCuvFQxluHhWPFT/9Tc6w/ejJ5HnqHz Jj5EUA+2IZzdZ06wL7KwZE/rcaHc9gtjPiaJ8aWy+x0aGLwtd2I+A+S8k/QHzpfXO+sLIy T1AeZ0UHXERCxhKPD4jkIvw8hdlNJcrT18GpCnFlHCkfMpmLIjWLDwvkJU+edg== X-Mailman-Original-Authentication-Results: smtp4.osuosl.org; dmarc=pass (p=reject dis=none) header.from=bootlin.com X-Mailman-Original-Authentication-Results: smtp4.osuosl.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key, unprotected) header.d=bootlin.com header.i=@bootlin.com header.a=rsa-sha256 header.s=gm1 header.b=ew3s3S5E Subject: Re: [Buildroot] [PATCH v2 4/4] toolchain/toolchain-bare-metal-buildroot: update help text for multiple tuple support X-BeenThere: buildroot@buildroot.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.30 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussion and development of buildroot List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Errors-To: buildroot-bounces@buildroot.org Sender: "buildroot" Hello Neal, On Fri, 14 Feb 2025 16:54:02 +0000 Neal Frager via buildroot wrote: > Now that binutils-bare-metal, gcc-bare-metal and newlib-bare-metal packages > have been upgraded to support a list of architecture tuples, this patch > updates the toolchain-bare-metal-buildroot help text to describe the new > capability. > > BR2_TOOLCHAIN_BARE_METAL_BUILDROOT_ARCH is still backwards compatible with > its prior definition as defining a single tuple with this new definition > works exactly the same as before. > > Signed-off-by: Neal Frager Overall looks good. Maybe one minor wording comment. > config BR2_TOOLCHAIN_BARE_METAL_BUILDROOT_ARCH > - string "architecture tuple" > + string "list of architecture tuples" > help > - This option allows to define the architecture tuple for the > - bare-metal toolchain. > + This option defines a list of architecture tuples for > + building bare metal toolchains. This option allows to define the list of architecture tuples for which bare-metal toolchains will be created. One toolchain will be built for each of the architecture tuples specified in this option. > + > + For example, to build both a microblaze and a riscv bare microblaze -> Microblaze riscv -> RISC-V > + metal toolchain for Xilinx platforms, use the following I'm not sure the "Xilinx platforms" here is very relevant. > + definition: > + "microblazeel-xilinx-elf riscv32-xilinx-elf" In fact, I'm not sure the "xilinx" parts of the tuples here are very relevant/useful. It's the vendor part of the tuple, so it has basically no effect. It would probably be even more logical to use microblazel-none-elf, or even microblazeel-buildroot-elf. Thanks! Thomas -- Thomas Petazzoni, co-owner and CEO, Bootlin Embedded Linux and Kernel engineering and training https://bootlin.com _______________________________________________ buildroot mailing list buildroot@buildroot.org https://lists.buildroot.org/mailman/listinfo/buildroot