From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from smtp1.osuosl.org (smtp1.osuosl.org [140.211.166.138]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 57850C87FCB for ; Tue, 5 Aug 2025 10:58:54 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by smtp1.osuosl.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0043683F2A; Tue, 5 Aug 2025 10:58:54 +0000 (UTC) X-Virus-Scanned: amavis at osuosl.org Received: from smtp1.osuosl.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (smtp1.osuosl.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavis, port 10024) with ESMTP id MlJPGWuXuydh; Tue, 5 Aug 2025 10:58:53 +0000 (UTC) X-Comment: SPF check N/A for local connections - client-ip=140.211.166.142; helo=lists1.osuosl.org; envelope-from=buildroot-bounces@buildroot.org; receiver= DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 smtp1.osuosl.org 3D0B083F27 Received: from lists1.osuosl.org (lists1.osuosl.org [140.211.166.142]) by smtp1.osuosl.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3D0B083F27; Tue, 5 Aug 2025 10:58:53 +0000 (UTC) Received: from smtp4.osuosl.org (smtp4.osuosl.org [IPv6:2605:bc80:3010::137]) by lists1.osuosl.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AA237118 for ; Tue, 5 Aug 2025 10:58:52 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by smtp4.osuosl.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 90B4B414BB for ; Tue, 5 Aug 2025 10:58:52 +0000 (UTC) X-Virus-Scanned: amavis at osuosl.org Received: from smtp4.osuosl.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (smtp4.osuosl.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavis, port 10024) with ESMTP id v7Oyc4UK_OZz for ; Tue, 5 Aug 2025 10:58:51 +0000 (UTC) Received-SPF: Pass (mailfrom) identity=mailfrom; client-ip=217.70.178.236; helo=relay16.mail.gandi.net; envelope-from=thomas.petazzoni@bootlin.com; receiver= DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.4.2 smtp4.osuosl.org 26B1741433 DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 smtp4.osuosl.org 26B1741433 Received: from relay16.mail.gandi.net (relay16.mail.gandi.net [217.70.178.236]) by smtp4.osuosl.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 26B1741433 for ; Tue, 5 Aug 2025 10:58:50 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail.gandi.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 9D9CF44963; Tue, 5 Aug 2025 10:58:47 +0000 (UTC) Date: Tue, 5 Aug 2025 12:58:46 +0200 To: "Frager, Neal" Cc: "buildroot@buildroot.org" , "giulio.benetti@benettiengineering.com" , "ju.o@free.fr" , "romain.naour@gmail.com" Message-ID: <20250805125846.31c941c1@windsurf> In-Reply-To: References: <20250728045145.132333-1-neal.frager@amd.com> <20250804214047.5cfcf471@windsurf> <20250805100953.380f13df@windsurf> Organization: Bootlin X-Mailer: Claws Mail 4.3.1 (GTK 3.24.43; x86_64-redhat-linux-gnu) MIME-Version: 1.0 X-GND-State: clean X-GND-Score: -100 X-GND-Cause: gggruggvucftvghtrhhoucdtuddrgeeffedrtdefgdduudegleelucetufdoteggodetrfdotffvucfrrhhofhhilhgvmecuifetpfffkfdpucggtfgfnhhsuhgsshgtrhhisggvnecuuegrihhlohhuthemuceftddunecusecvtfgvtghiphhivghnthhsucdlqddutddtmdenucfjughrpeffhffvvefukfgjfhhoofggtgfgsehtjeertdertddvnecuhfhrohhmpefvhhhomhgrshcurfgvthgriiiiohhnihcuoehthhhomhgrshdrphgvthgriiiiohhnihessghoohhtlhhinhdrtghomheqnecuggftrfgrthhtvghrnhepledtgedvjeehgeetgfeufffglefhkedvfeduveeiieelteeliedtfefguefggffhnecuffhomhgrihhnpegsohhothhlihhnrdgtohhmnecukfhppedvrgdtudemtggsudekmeekieegugemvddutddtmegrtddtfhemheelsgefmeegfhdvmeeifegusgenucevlhhushhtvghrufhiiigvpedtnecurfgrrhgrmhepihhnvghtpedvrgdtudemtggsudekmeekieegugemvddutddtmegrtddtfhemheelsgefmeegfhdvmeeifegusgdphhgvlhhopeifihhnughsuhhrfhdpmhgrihhlfhhrohhmpehthhhomhgrshdrphgvthgriiiiohhnihessghoohhtlhhinhdrtghomhdpnhgspghrtghpthhtohephedprhgtphhtthhopehnvggrlhdrfhhrrghgvghrsegrmhgurdgtohhmpdhrtghpthhtohepsghuihhlughrohhothessghuihhlughrohhothdrohhrghdprhgtphhtthhopehgihhulhhio hdrsggvnhgvthhtihessggvnhgvthhtihgvnhhgihhnvggvrhhinhhgrdgtohhmpdhrtghpthhtohepjhhurdhosehfrhgvvgdrfhhrpdhrtghpthhtoheprhhomhgrihhnrdhnrghouhhrsehgmhgrihhlrdgtohhm X-Mailman-Original-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=bootlin.com; s=gm1; t=1754391528; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: content-transfer-encoding:content-transfer-encoding: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=E0qSmU50/3MoxwWH645YHAiAqtrRqTCmNp40GV7o6yI=; b=oaTvZSH3l4LNP3HvOf28eXJTzfk/Wz99Z0R+yS39LTZU0upFonolIsQfLonQcrIH/Mfsi/ V8ncgOLPl4iBRR+96e0WjUJTo0IKnTT2rt04sOP8Vh2pCuPqNl2QAOSxKyfcT//yaCpQ4F 8CSpu8p42qnfaGV0Z23RJBZL6Ir+bAdxZWA3e8jObXX6jJhbXMTQISKcYTD5BzqdWh8VMV ZDZdu7jCD7nswTolFZswQqZd2bzv17o+kRV6qZNYa78CmLIaz1UYePrtqWe1dWm1uk1M/q 09ZjSgMj3zOm4D7I5/GTPHsNUF4NN602EW2hm29XeGTzDKfS2Q/yfiF/bcDdBA== X-Mailman-Original-Authentication-Results: smtp4.osuosl.org; dmarc=pass (p=reject dis=none) header.from=bootlin.com X-Mailman-Original-Authentication-Results: smtp4.osuosl.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key, unprotected) header.d=bootlin.com header.i=@bootlin.com header.a=rsa-sha256 header.s=gm1 header.b=oaTvZSH3 Subject: Re: [Buildroot] [PATCH v1 1/1] package/gcc: add microblaze atomic support X-BeenThere: buildroot@buildroot.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.30 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussion and development of buildroot List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , From: Thomas Petazzoni via buildroot Reply-To: Thomas Petazzoni Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Errors-To: buildroot-bounces@buildroot.org Sender: "buildroot" Hello, On Tue, 5 Aug 2025 10:31:40 +0000 "Frager, Neal" wrote: > I would guess that running init under strace would be the more useful option. > > I have already tested that gcc 15.1 works just fine with microblaze, as I am > using gcc 15.1 with the gcc-bare-metal package to build the zynqmp pmufw, as > well as the versal plm and psmfw applications. My expectation is that gcc 15 > is mostly working for microblaze, and that just picking a random user space > application to build will probably work as expected. > > There seems to be something specific in the init script that is failing. > Should we consider creating another gcc bug report against gcc 15.x? We can certainly do so, but we don't have a lot of data to provide at the moment :/ Best regards, Thomas -- Thomas Petazzoni, co-owner and CEO, Bootlin Embedded Linux and Kernel engineering and training https://bootlin.com _______________________________________________ buildroot mailing list buildroot@buildroot.org https://lists.buildroot.org/mailman/listinfo/buildroot