From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from smtp3.osuosl.org (smtp3.osuosl.org [140.211.166.136]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 84DEED4A603 for ; Fri, 16 Jan 2026 06:23:41 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by smtp3.osuosl.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3FE8161BFF; Fri, 16 Jan 2026 06:23:41 +0000 (UTC) X-Virus-Scanned: amavis at osuosl.org Received: from smtp3.osuosl.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (smtp3.osuosl.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavis, port 10024) with ESMTP id ZtnQzuZThyfr; Fri, 16 Jan 2026 06:23:40 +0000 (UTC) X-Comment: SPF check N/A for local connections - client-ip=140.211.166.142; helo=lists1.osuosl.org; envelope-from=buildroot-bounces@buildroot.org; receiver= DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 smtp3.osuosl.org D2243616D4 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=buildroot.org; s=default; t=1768544619; bh=n9hkO8ZjFid4ktPlsXNHT6ByHE00SyUDN+5EZdLyjac=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:References:In-Reply-To:Subject:List-Id: List-Unsubscribe:List-Archive:List-Post:List-Help:List-Subscribe: Reply-To:From; b=hzct8phQmWa9rd6pYX911u1xEzF72gW6U2AImXldTs90HlXIoMDyG4OTCSJuNwEcJ lVULQ3mmlM0BqkEWX8TpZ5jboNrEy0Mk0ENUmQU7GMo0QJrJb+0qJcRhsSsJwl7qwR 8o6JhCFKG7bfWrLMyj0ve8Qx/wYF/S0yG3CuTLt6306zSXBstgg8gY6qh9imorg43H 2yLUs0OgDI4XkHW47wQUEz3LUO+0BmPMl1mG/MePG/ckpf1gzQWtqdNQn6FrGU1s4q q5Ayyv7MUU+NxZFdwuvkr9HUCDwRslYprq93KNQjnCILLMapaHl65O69hTi2d0dOfl 5KTcVrBA04haw== Received: from lists1.osuosl.org (lists1.osuosl.org [140.211.166.142]) by smtp3.osuosl.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D2243616D4; Fri, 16 Jan 2026 06:23:39 +0000 (UTC) Received: from smtp3.osuosl.org (smtp3.osuosl.org [IPv6:2605:bc80:3010::136]) by lists1.osuosl.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 113ED1C3 for ; Fri, 16 Jan 2026 06:23:39 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by smtp3.osuosl.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 029BE615FA for ; Fri, 16 Jan 2026 06:23:39 +0000 (UTC) X-Virus-Scanned: amavis at osuosl.org Received: from smtp3.osuosl.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (smtp3.osuosl.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavis, port 10024) with ESMTP id rFdjw_8sLQul for ; Fri, 16 Jan 2026 06:23:38 +0000 (UTC) Received-SPF: Pass (mailfrom) identity=mailfrom; client-ip=2a00:1450:4864:20::336; helo=mail-wm1-x336.google.com; envelope-from=petr.vorel@gmail.com; receiver= DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.4.2 smtp3.osuosl.org E11D3615DD DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 smtp3.osuosl.org E11D3615DD Received: from mail-wm1-x336.google.com (mail-wm1-x336.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4864:20::336]) by smtp3.osuosl.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E11D3615DD for ; Fri, 16 Jan 2026 06:23:37 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-wm1-x336.google.com with SMTP id 5b1f17b1804b1-47ee301a06aso14919385e9.0 for ; Thu, 15 Jan 2026 22:23:37 -0800 (PST) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20230601; t=1768544616; x=1769149416; h=in-reply-to:content-disposition:mime-version:references:reply-to :message-id:subject:cc:to:from:date:x-gm-gg:x-gm-message-state:from :to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=1ArHIGOSYHUiuqM9IxK+wSjcTxkAGFaGvP5jeSaa7QI=; b=m2o4bbck6JjjRIjyCU+1flT4CQ0qgneGZ6jF0JUvkeBHfHoq5jITkw64481RrTK2yM hq+e+4kpT5EBrcBziu6Tyv7B4xvf6+CTZ697l6QoeRnq2xRnwnuf37HNfsTS5BIhvj6k nEBDXRNOV5V6cIk4aLKK7485c057t4Xq33NLvdT/Kz9xwqkcXrstAWrmWyRYK7mwhjw4 dyYAviFy/1oM2cHIROskGEkGoLMRHqHQ3yG6ywPEXQ85/e2pG2wp9mtkG898aTHCl+PX RebdBgodRYVRZBUoftz28DhgDTfHxucUtb3kn5jOZEmkIJEliNCZz7jnlEPQYFW5Sg6u EO4A== X-Gm-Message-State: AOJu0Yxs6l8Yu8DWKlULp01zOC0sUAXncSGXHPNTtS7dHUKncJu0Ol5G EowSuKXwkPC02jhIQ8WU/VLXGEeld1Pdwobt/CXzhIqZ92TK6JDJVtNv X-Gm-Gg: AY/fxX4RLrObNP3EYTmN6N2vi3BVGj/0JsFYKOJ66tGTrJN6pUxrOqYlnNVgiKibThv Ze0NOl49WrPkQyAy6pwV4hrb9uK8cSK0raBMZDnslvkLzha9jrkXKggibQfTdipg/IosWIrqUSD fdYe5Wf/H6rLFI3YsIM7cdpsYnMN+OVO6xNQ7AOfXe7868+okWwwjyDVyz3POBL0iKYf2ACD/pn C8e7Ra0ao9J1emqFFquRMYlHPOBBGCyWn83aKmUvCThBG4pkk02J/zZBSdOUF9mztRAlSySCbCn /saqNad+9b02CF+Lax0BVOKgjVFeqQv4iZBzPS40Wu5lhKfLRwjw2h2qGGMMFRTdbj8t9Xzxkr8 +e55PWhzAY2P1hKI8z3Jgs9eBC9CYti3wxrjaETBv/HPrbYd+5LP6H8ZTcifCGjJQgGts/3Bgq6 4doEOlyvhNK9jRpRcvtZ7tR05KwN0rp4jDUWfY8H5T6so2ezgP X-Received: by 2002:a05:600c:3495:b0:477:639d:bca2 with SMTP id 5b1f17b1804b1-4801eaadbd9mr15079945e9.4.1768544615710; Thu, 15 Jan 2026 22:23:35 -0800 (PST) Received: from pevik (gw1.ms-free.net. [185.243.124.10]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id 5b1f17b1804b1-4801fd3bcd2sm10391755e9.1.2026.01.15.22.23.34 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Thu, 15 Jan 2026 22:23:35 -0800 (PST) Date: Fri, 16 Jan 2026 07:23:32 +0100 From: Petr Vorel To: Thomas Petazzoni Cc: Julien Olivain via buildroot , Julien Olivain , Maxim Tarelov Message-ID: <20260116062332.GA554275@pevik> References: <20251221180810.3770181-1-ju.o@free.fr> <20251228232021.4d4e70c9@windsurf> <20251230174958.GA496221@pevik> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: X-Mailman-Original-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20230601; t=1768544616; x=1769149416; darn=buildroot.org; h=in-reply-to:content-disposition:mime-version:references:reply-to :message-id:subject:cc:to:from:date:from:to:cc:subject:date :message-id:reply-to; bh=1ArHIGOSYHUiuqM9IxK+wSjcTxkAGFaGvP5jeSaa7QI=; b=aNUaPzY3Kry33auID3h5XEg6M0qm0/DKaQCdk7BU7VEIkM0k9QAxba4OH6BTLM+Hux 8Sw+jSsgggGYDcxsuLRxigd26SqVraKDFhOP20+iE+rdMi0ao8cPFblt0qBFGqDUw5jV +mii7/9EMgD9NAsZGelQb5OI2MQ+uxt/zH67hEtz46IC3Mw1tD/ZNquSt9JW95/LsRbE /QNqJaMvLaZUrFePtwPamTlRM6XASH3x3Ip3WS0dFm/l/i0p+gbhUT5nPY73zdug4vO4 2pfY26axErVs6Hq97oBfP8LH2zDt0ElAz5SabSLBqNR8/Vknkq1UqFqhbJhUrSOnh5BE kxdA== X-Mailman-Original-Authentication-Results: smtp3.osuosl.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=gmail.com X-Mailman-Original-Authentication-Results: smtp3.osuosl.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com header.i=@gmail.com header.a=rsa-sha256 header.s=20230601 header.b=aNUaPzY3 Subject: Re: [Buildroot] [PATCH 1/1] support/testing: ltp-testsuite: replace runltp by kirk X-BeenThere: buildroot@buildroot.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.30 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussion and development of buildroot List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Reply-To: Petr Vorel Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Errors-To: buildroot-bounces@buildroot.org Sender: "buildroot" Hi all, > Hello, [ Cc Maxim ] > On Tue, Dec 30, 2025 at 06:49:58PM +0100, Petr Vorel wrote: > > Yeah. I don't like it either. Specially LTP tests themselves does not require > > anything (single test is either binary written in C statically linked LTP > > libraries, we also have few POSIX compatible shell based tests which require > > barely minimum of external dependencies), it can be run as is. > > ATM we have list of tests in so called runtest files [1], which contain list of > > tests (each line is single test: "test_label binary/script optional_arguments"), > > therefore anything which can remove the first parameter and execute the rest can > > be LTP runner. i.e. Buildroot custom script could be really minimal. > I don't think I would want Buildroot to carry its own custom script > for this. Fair enough. We suggested the solution for the people which insisted we'd keep old runltp script forever. And I tend to suggest it when see patches like this one: https://lore.kernel.org/buildroot/20260114192413.569151-1-tarelovma@yandex.ru/ > > runltp does quite a few other things but these who need them should really move > > to kirk. Also we plan to implement in kirk and ltx running tests in parallel. > > That will save a lot of runtime. > > [1] https://github.com/linux-test-project/ltp/tree/master/runtest > > > One option would as suggested by Petr to use kirk in its intended mode, > > > with kirk running on the host, and connected over SSH to the target to > > > run tests. > > > On the other hand, it was a lot more simple/convenient to be able to > > > just run a simple shell script on the target to run the test suite. > > Would it be possible to have both? Vendor runltp for local use and package kirk > > as a host package (+ ltx as normal package)? > I'm not sure what you're suggesting as "both"? Do you mean, having a > simple test runner that we can run directly on the target, but also > offer the possibility of building/installing kirk to run the test > suite from the host? Yes. > I'm not sure what ltx is in this context. https://github.com/linux-test-project/ltx (ltx is not yet relevant because it is still experimental / unfinished. It's a test executor which allows to execute binaries on host in the fastest way as possible. In the future together with LTP metadata it will allow to run tests in parallel - speedup.) Kind regards, Petr > Best regards, > Thomas _______________________________________________ buildroot mailing list buildroot@buildroot.org https://lists.buildroot.org/mailman/listinfo/buildroot