From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from smtp1.osuosl.org (smtp1.osuosl.org [140.211.166.138]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 887F6C3DA42 for ; Wed, 10 Jul 2024 15:42:36 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by smtp1.osuosl.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 53817820BD; Wed, 10 Jul 2024 15:42:36 +0000 (UTC) X-Virus-Scanned: amavis at osuosl.org Received: from smtp1.osuosl.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (smtp1.osuosl.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavis, port 10024) with ESMTP id BO6HDHmjl9pg; Wed, 10 Jul 2024 15:42:35 +0000 (UTC) X-Comment: SPF check N/A for local connections - client-ip=140.211.166.34; helo=ash.osuosl.org; envelope-from=buildroot-bounces@buildroot.org; receiver= DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 smtp1.osuosl.org 579428209C Received: from ash.osuosl.org (ash.osuosl.org [140.211.166.34]) by smtp1.osuosl.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 579428209C; Wed, 10 Jul 2024 15:42:35 +0000 (UTC) Received: from smtp4.osuosl.org (smtp4.osuosl.org [140.211.166.137]) by ash.osuosl.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0F9351BF5A7 for ; Wed, 10 Jul 2024 15:42:34 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by smtp4.osuosl.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0881C4156D for ; Wed, 10 Jul 2024 15:42:34 +0000 (UTC) X-Virus-Scanned: amavis at osuosl.org Received: from smtp4.osuosl.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (smtp4.osuosl.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavis, port 10024) with ESMTP id saP2H6gLWwZD for ; Wed, 10 Jul 2024 15:42:33 +0000 (UTC) Received-SPF: Pass (mailfrom) identity=mailfrom; client-ip=2a01:4f8:1c0c:5073::1; helo=mail.heine.tech; envelope-from=buildroot@heine.tech; receiver= DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.4.2 smtp4.osuosl.org D92544156C DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 smtp4.osuosl.org D92544156C Received: from mail.heine.tech (mail.heine.tech [IPv6:2a01:4f8:1c0c:5073::1]) by smtp4.osuosl.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D92544156C for ; Wed, 10 Jul 2024 15:42:32 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [127.0.0.1] (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by localhost (Mailerdaemon) with ESMTPA id 6F9171814B9; Wed, 10 Jul 2024 17:42:28 +0200 (CEST) In-Reply-To: <20240710163928.4fd390b1@windsurf> References: <20240710081348.60978-1-buildroot@heine.tech> <20240710104842.16dbf85c@windsurf> <25518-668e5180-5-147108a0@236288521> <20240710163928.4fd390b1@windsurf> Date: Wed, 10 Jul 2024 17:42:28 +0200 To: "Thomas Petazzoni" MIME-Version: 1.0 Message-ID: <27bb6-668eac00-5-6e811900@44543821> User-Agent: SOGoMail 5.10.0 X-Last-TLS-Session-Version: None X-Mailman-Original-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=heine.tech; s=dkim; t=1720626149; h=from:subject:date:message-id:to:cc:mime-version:content-type: content-transfer-encoding:in-reply-to:references; bh=LfFs2cSmL7hVg36dSaMpX6UyPJ/F2R175xQUycZWjUQ=; b=A29hHZcAv6dRHu7Lsikn0fPpI+KtNvBjiGGY749q9xqUhVmxMI4yas4KfT3WXolDEVVhkS SH57SOuwfqo4Cr1U4/bw0bSdYE+D82qgC+9+WcDQEblkbPs2ltYHIsluh8MUJFsPrgEVT1 InKKqS79cyngaDCzuLORJ9/iKsUuxsc= X-Mailman-Original-Authentication-Results: smtp4.osuosl.org; dmarc=pass (p=quarantine dis=none) header.from=heine.tech X-Mailman-Original-Authentication-Results: smtp4.osuosl.org; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=heine.tech header.i=@heine.tech header.a=rsa-sha256 header.s=dkim header.b=A29hHZcA Subject: Re: [Buildroot] =?utf-8?q?=5BPATCH=5D_package/sqlitecpp=3A_new_packa?= =?utf-8?q?ge?= X-BeenThere: buildroot@buildroot.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussion and development of buildroot List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , From: Michael Nosthoff via buildroot Reply-To: Michael Nosthoff Cc: Samuel Martin , Michael Nosthoff via buildroot Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Errors-To: buildroot-bounces@buildroot.org Sender: "buildroot" Hi Thomas, all, On Wednesday, July 10, 2024 16:39 CEST, Thomas Petazzoni wrote: > Hello Michael, > > On Wed, 10 Jul 2024 11:16:24 +0200 > "Michael Nosthoff" wrote: > > > One additional thing: This library requires C++11, I think all compilers we have currently in buildroot should > > be recent enough to support it. Or do we need a gcc version check here as well? > > We need a gcc version check. Which version depends on which C++11 > features are used. Some packages need gcc 4.7, some gcc 4.8, some gcc > 4.9: then I will prepare a patch for this package. > > package/cli11/Config.in: depends on BR2_TOOLCHAIN_GCC_AT_LEAST_4_8 # C++11 > package/clpeak/Config.in: depends on BR2_TOOLCHAIN_GCC_AT_LEAST_4_8 # C++11 > package/cutelyst/Config.in: depends on BR2_TOOLCHAIN_GCC_AT_LEAST_4_8 # C++11 > package/docopt-cpp/Config.in: depends on BR2_TOOLCHAIN_GCC_AT_LEAST_4_7 # C++11 > package/edid-decode/Config.in: depends on BR2_TOOLCHAIN_GCC_AT_LEAST_4_7 # C++11 > package/efl/Config.in: depends on BR2_TOOLCHAIN_GCC_AT_LEAST_4_9 # C++11 > etc. > > some even need gcc 5.x: > > package/qt5/Config.in: depends on BR2_HOST_GCC_AT_LEAST_5 # Full C++11 > > > Related: I'm currently looking at bumping boost. And in the last versions many libs dropped their support for C++98. > > So if we could just rely on the availability of C++11 this would make this much easier. > > If that also requires a gcc version dependency, then we would have to > add it to Boost, and then to all its reverse dependencies: > that's what I feared. Do you have some advice on how to test with gcc 4.7/4.7/4.9? The oldest toolchain on bootlin I can find is gcc 5.4. Is there any other toolchain located somewhere with an older gcc? Regards, Michael _______________________________________________ buildroot mailing list buildroot@buildroot.org https://lists.buildroot.org/mailman/listinfo/buildroot