From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?J=E9r=F4me?= Pouiller Date: Mon, 09 Nov 2015 09:43:56 +0100 Subject: [Buildroot] [PATCH 3/4] libfslparser: add install hooks to fix libraries path In-Reply-To: References: <1446149212-12048-1-git-send-email-gary.bisson@boundarydevices.com> <1924419.qtieCN8KUx@sagittea> Message-ID: <3216905.pxiEsz4o6j@sagittea> List-Id: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: buildroot@busybox.net On Sunday 08 November 2015 17:08:43 Gary Bisson wrote: > Hi J?r?me, > > On Fri, Oct 30, 2015 at 11:43 AM, J?r?me Pouiller wrote: > > On Friday 30 October 2015 11:36:21 Gary Bisson wrote: [...] > >> Although it might have been more consistent to have the staging > >> hook > >> in both, I chose to reduce the patch as much as possible. Plus I'm > >> not sure people will like my symlink approach in the staging > >> directory.> > > IMHO, target/ should be a subset of staging/ (even if today, this is > > far from the case). So, I would prefer to also create symlinks in > > staging/. > So I'm ok with adding the symlinks to the fslparser staging as well. > But if we'd really like to have target as a subset of staging, > shouldn't we use symlinks for the target too? Sure, I am in favor to use symlinks for target/ also. BR, -- J?r?me Pouiller, Sysmic Embedded Linux specialist http://www.sysmic.fr