From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Carlos Santos Date: Fri, 7 Dec 2018 09:41:28 -0200 (BRST) Subject: [Buildroot] [PATCH] pcm-tools: new package In-Reply-To: <20181207121559.7e1b11e4@windsurf> References: <20180123140324.20801-1-casantos@datacom.ind.br> <20180123140324.20801-2-casantos@datacom.ind.br> <20180401161654.6412d152@windsurf> <1919985279.1291627.1522720961448.JavaMail.zimbra@datacom.ind.br> <1017622378.1606234.1544146335281.JavaMail.zimbra@datacom.com.br> <20181207121559.7e1b11e4@windsurf> Message-ID: <368276849.1649228.1544182888744.JavaMail.zimbra@datacom.com.br> List-Id: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: buildroot@busybox.net ----- Original Message ----- > From: "Thomas Petazzoni" > To: "Carlos Santos" > Cc: "buildroot" , "Romain Naour" > Sent: Sexta-feira, 7 de dezembro de 2018 9:15:59 > Subject: Re: [Buildroot] [PATCH] pcm-tools: new package > Hello Carlos, > > On Thu, 6 Dec 2018 23:32:15 -0200 (BRST), Carlos Santos wrote: > >> Superseded-by: https://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/1009149/ > > I am wondering: is this Superseded-by really understood by patchwork to > make a patch as Superseded? I don't see Superseded-by used in the > patchwork code base. > > I see that the patch was marked as Superseded in patchwork, was it done > manually by you, or automatically thanks to this e-mail ? Manually by me. > If it was done manually by you, then I think it's not really useful to > send this Superseded-by e-mail: we see in patchwork the latest version > anyway, which is what is important. I use them to leave a track of my patches, since patchwork does not help much (smells like 1980, in fact, even tough it was written much later). -- Carlos Santos (Casantos) - DATACOM, P&D